Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2024-32645

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:18
Updated At-02 Aug, 2024 | 02:13
Rejected At-
Credits

vyper performs incorrect topic logging in raw_log

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, incorrect values can be logged when `raw_log` builtin is called with memory or storage arguments to be used as topics. A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. The `build_IR` function of the `RawLog` class fails to properly unwrap the variables provided as topics. Consequently, incorrect values are logged as topics. As of time of publication, no fixed version is available.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:25 Apr, 2024 | 17:18
Updated At:02 Aug, 2024 | 02:13
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
vyper performs incorrect topic logging in raw_log

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, incorrect values can be logged when `raw_log` builtin is called with memory or storage arguments to be used as topics. A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. The `build_IR` function of the `RawLog` class fails to properly unwrap the variables provided as topics. Consequently, incorrect values are logged as topics. As of time of publication, no fixed version is available.

Affected Products
Vendor
vyperlang
Product
vyper
Versions
Affected
  • <= 0.3.10
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-20CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-20
Description: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Vendor
vyperlang
Product
vyper
CPEs
  • cpe:2.3:a:vyperlang:vyper:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • From 0 through 0.3.10 (custom)
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
2. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:25 Apr, 2024 | 18:15
Updated At:02 Jan, 2025 | 22:52

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, incorrect values can be logged when `raw_log` builtin is called with memory or storage arguments to be used as topics. A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. The `build_IR` function of the `RawLog` class fails to properly unwrap the variables provided as topics. Consequently, incorrect values are logged as topics. As of time of publication, no fixed version is available.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CPE Matches

vyperlang
vyperlang
>>vyper>>Versions before 0.4.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:vyperlang:vyper:*:*:*:*:*:python:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-20Secondarysecurity-advisories@github.com
NVD-CWE-noinfoPrimarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-20
Type: Secondary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: NVD-CWE-noinfo
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3security-advisories@github.com
Vendor Advisory
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

101Records found

CVE-2024-32646
Matching Score-10
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.77% / 72.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:21
Updated-02 Jan, 2025 | 22:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper performs double eval of the slice args when buffer from adhoc locations

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `slice` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when the buffer argument is either `msg.data`, `self.code` or `<address>.code` and either the `start` or `length` arguments have side-effects. It can be easily triggered only with the versions `<0.3.4` as `0.3.4` introduced the unique symbol fence. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-32481
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.58% / 80.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:00
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 17:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper's range(start, start + N) reverts for negative numbers

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. Starting in version 0.3.8 and prior to version 0.4.0b1, when looping over a `range` of the form `range(start, start + N)`, if `start` is negative, the execution will always revert. This issue is caused by an incorrect assertion inserted by the code generation of the range `stmt.parse_For_range()`. The issue arises when `start` is signed, instead of using `sle`, `le` is used and `start` is interpreted as an unsigned integer for the comparison. If it is a negative number, its 255th bit is set to `1` and is hence interpreted as a very large unsigned integer making the assertion always fail. Any contract having a `range(start, start + N)` where `start` is a signed integer with the possibility for `start` to be negative is affected. If a call goes through the loop while supplying a negative `start` the execution will revert. Version 0.4.0b1 fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-681
Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types
CVE-2024-32647
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.66% / 70.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:41
Updated-02 Jan, 2025 | 22:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper performs double eval of raw_args in create_from_blueprint

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `create_from_blueprint` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when `raw_args=True` and the `args` argument has side-effects. It can be seen that the `_build_create_IR` function of the `create_from_blueprint` builtin doesn't cache the mentioned `args` argument to the stack. As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack). No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions exist.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-95
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
CVE-2024-32648
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 55.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:48
Updated-02 Jan, 2025 | 22:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper default functions don't respect nonreentrancy keys

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. Prior to version 0.3.0, default functions don't respect nonreentrancy keys and the lock isn't emitted. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, using a lock on a `default` function is a very sparsely used pattern. As such, the impact is low. Version 0.3.0 contains a patch for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-667
Improper Locking
CVE-2023-42441
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Sep, 2023 | 20:19
Updated-24 Sep, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vyper has incorrect re-entrancy lock when key is empty string

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Starting in version 0.2.9 and prior to version 0.3.10, locks of the type `@nonreentrant("")` or `@nonreentrant('')` do not produce reentrancy checks at runtime. This issue is fixed in version 0.3.10. As a workaround, ensure the lock name is a non-empty string.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-833
Deadlock
CWE ID-CWE-667
Improper Locking
CVE-2023-41052
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.07% / 21.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Sep, 2023 | 17:36
Updated-26 Sep, 2024 | 18:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vyper: incorrect order of evaluation of side effects for some builtins

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language. In affected versions the order of evaluation of the arguments of the builtin functions `uint256_addmod`, `uint256_mulmod`, `ecadd` and `ecmul` does not follow source order. This behaviour is problematic when the evaluation of one of the arguments produces side effects that other arguments depend on. A patch is currently being developed on pull request #3583. When using builtins from the list above, users should make sure that the arguments of the expression do not produce side effects or, if one does, that no other argument is dependent on those side effects.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-670
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
CVE-2023-40015
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.07% / 22.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Sep, 2023 | 17:39
Updated-19 Nov, 2024 | 16:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vyper: reversed order of side effects for some operations

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language. For the following (probably non-exhaustive) list of expressions, the compiler evaluates the arguments from right to left instead of left to right. `unsafe_add, unsafe_sub, unsafe_mul, unsafe_div, pow_mod256, |, &, ^ (bitwise operators), bitwise_or (deprecated), bitwise_and (deprecated), bitwise_xor (deprecated), raw_call, <, >, <=, >=, ==, !=, in, not in (when lhs and rhs are enums)`. This behaviour becomes a problem when the evaluation of one of the arguments produces side effects that other arguments depend on. The following expressions can produce side-effect: state modifying external call , state modifying internal call, `raw_call`, `pop()` when used on a Dynamic Array stored in the storage, `create_minimal_proxy_to`, `create_copy_of`, `create_from_blueprint`. This issue has not yet been patched. Users are advised to make sure that the arguments of the expression do not produce side effects or, if one does, that no other argument is dependent on those side effects.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-670
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
CVE-2023-37902
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Jul, 2023 | 20:05
Updated-03 Oct, 2024 | 18:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vyper's ecrecover can return undefined data if signature does not verify

Vyper is a Pythonic programming language that targets the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Prior to version 0.3.10, the ecrecover precompile does not fill the output buffer if the signature does not verify. However, the ecrecover builtin will still return whatever is at memory location 0. This means that the if the compiler has been convinced to write to the 0 memory location with specially crafted data (generally, this can happen with a hashmap access or immutable read) just before the ecrecover, a signature check might pass on an invalid signature. Version 0.3.10 contains a patch for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-252
Unchecked Return Value
CVE-2023-32675
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.18% / 40.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2023 | 19:46
Updated-12 Feb, 2025 | 16:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nonpayable default functions are sometimes payable in vyper

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In contracts with more than one regular nonpayable function, it is possible to send funds to the default function, even if the default function is marked `nonpayable`. This applies to contracts compiled with vyper versions prior to 0.3.8. This issue was fixed by the removal of the global `calldatasize` check in commit `02339dfda`. Users are advised to upgrade to version 0.3.8. Users unable to upgrade should avoid use of nonpayable default functions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-670
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
CVE-2024-32649
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.89% / 74.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:53
Updated-02 Jan, 2025 | 22:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper performs double eval of the argument of sqrt

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `sqrt` builtin can result in double eval vulnerability when the argument has side-effects. It can be seen that the `build_IR` function of the `sqrt` builtin doesn't cache the argument to the stack. As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack). No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-95
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
CVE-2024-24567
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2024 | 20:17
Updated-16 Jun, 2025 | 18:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2022-23814
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jan, 2023 | 20:56
Updated-09 Apr, 2025 | 14:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Failure to validate addresses provided by software to BIOS commands may result in a potential loss of integrity of guest memory in a confidential compute environment.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Product-milanpi-sp3_firmwaremilanpi-sp33rd Gen EPYC
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2016-10765
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 47.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Jul, 2019 | 16:10
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

edx-platform before 2016-06-10 allows account activation with a spoofed e-mail address.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-edxn/a
Product-edx-platformn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2010-3667
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.32% / 54.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2019 | 21:58
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 03:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TYPO3 before 4.1.14, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, 4.3.x before 4.3.4 and 4.4.x before 4.4.1 allows Spam Abuse in the native form content element.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aTYPO3 Association
Product-typo3n/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-22963
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-07 Apr, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The personnummer implementation before 3.0.3 for Dart mishandles numbers in which the last four digits match the ^000[0-9]$ regular expression.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-personnummern/a
Product-personnummern/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-22730
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 42.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jan, 2023 | 21:27
Updated-10 Mar, 2025 | 21:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Input Validation of Clearance sale in cart

Shopware is an open source commerce platform based on Symfony Framework and Vue js. In affected versions It was possible to put the same line item multiple times in the cart using the AP. The Cart Validators checked the line item's individuality and the user was able to bypass quantity limits in sales. This problem has been fixed with version 6.4.18.1. Users on major versions 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 may also obtain this fix via a plugin.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-shopwareshopware
Product-shopwareplatform
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-20232
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Aug, 2023 | 21:39
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 09:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the Tomcat implementation for Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a web cache poisoning attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation of HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to a specific API endpoint on the Unified CCX Finesse Portal. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the internal WebProxy to redirect users to an attacker-controlled host.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-unified_contact_center_expressCisco Unified Contact Center Express
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-29042
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.26% / 49.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Mar, 2024 | 16:46
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 01:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Translate Cache Poisoning Vulnerability

Translate is a package that allows users to convert text to different languages on Node.js and the browser. Prior to version 3.0.0, an attacker controlling the second variable of the `translate` function is able to perform a cache poisoning attack. They can change the outcome of translation requests made by subsequent users. The `opt.id` parameter allows the overwriting of the cache key. If an attacker sets the `id` variable to the cache key that would be generated by another user, they can choose the response that user gets served. Version 3.0.0 fixes this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-franciscopfranciscop
Product-translatetranslate
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-44553
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 25.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-01 May, 2025 | 14:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The HiView module has a vulnerability of not filtering third-party apps out when the HiView module traverses to invoke the system provider. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause third-party apps to start periodically.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-harmonyosemuiHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-43515
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zabbix
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zabbix
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Dec, 2022 | 01:49
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 17:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X-Forwarded-For header is active by default causes access to Zabbix sites in maintenance mode

Zabbix Frontend provides a feature that allows admins to maintain the installation and ensure that only certain IP addresses can access it. In this way, any user will not be able to access the Zabbix Frontend while it is being maintained and possible sensitive data will be prevented from being disclosed. An attacker can bypass this protection and access the instance using IP address not listed in the defined range.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ZABBIX
Product-frontendFrontend
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-863
Incorrect Authorization
CVE-2024-25997
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT@VDE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 35.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2024 | 08:11
Updated-23 Jan, 2025 | 18:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PHOENIX CONTACT: Log injection in CHARX Series

An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform a log injection due to improper input validation. Only a certain log file is affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG
Product-charx_sec-3150_firmwarecharx_sec-3050charx_sec-3000_firmwarecharx_sec-3100_firmwarecharx_sec-3100charx_sec-3000charx_sec-3150charx_sec-3050_firmwareCHARX SEC-3050CHARX SEC-3000CHARX SEC-3150CHARX SEC-3100charx_sec_3150charx_sec_3050charx_sec_3100charx_sec_3000
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-4033
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 19.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Nov, 2022 | 20:25
Updated-23 Jan, 2025 | 21:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Quiz and Survey Master plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to input validation bypass via the 'question[id]' parameter in versions up to, and including, 8.0.4 due to insufficient input validation that allows attackers to inject content other than the specified value (i.e. a number, file path, etc..). This makes it possible attackers to submit values other than the intended input type.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-expresstechexpresstech
Product-quiz_and_survey_masterQuiz And Survey Master – Best Quiz, Exam and Survey Plugin for WordPress
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-15109
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 42.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Aug, 2020 | 23:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ability to change order address without triggering address validations in solidus

In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipment costs associated with the new shipment. All stores with at least two shipping zones and different costs of shipment per zone are impacted. This problem comes from how checkout permitted attributes are structured. We have a single list of attributes that are permitted across the whole checkout, no matter the step that is being submitted. See the linked reference for more information. As a workaround, if it is not possible to upgrade to a supported patched version, please use this gist in the references section.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nebulabsolidusio
Product-solidussolidus
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-862
Missing Authorization
CVE-2024-21507
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 56.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Apr, 2024 | 05:00
Updated-17 Jun, 2025 | 18:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Versions of the package mysql2 before 3.9.3 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation through the keyFromFields function, resulting in cache poisoning. An attacker can inject a colon (:) character within a value of the attacker-crafted key.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sidoraresn/amysqljs
Product-mysql2mysql2mysql2
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-34350
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 6.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:12
Updated-25 Mar, 2025 | 13:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM API Connect security bypass

IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.5.0, 10.0.1.0 through 10.0.1.7, and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.20 is vulnerable to External Service Interaction attack, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to induce the application to perform server-side DNS lookups or HTTP requests to arbitrary domain names. By submitting suitable payloads, an attacker can cause the application server to attack other systems that it can interact with. IBM X-Force ID: 230264.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-api_connectAPI Connect
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-32248
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 43.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2022 | 20:27
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 07:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Due to missing input validation in the Manage Checkbooks component of SAP S/4HANA - version 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, an attacker could insert or edit the value of an existing field in the database. This leads to an impact on the integrity of the data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SAP SE
Product-s\/4hanaSAP S/4HANA
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-13666
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 14.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Mar, 2025 | 08:24
Updated-24 Mar, 2025 | 13:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Fluent Forms – Customizable Contact Forms, Survey, Quiz, & Conversational Form Builder <= 5.2.12 - IP-Spoofing

The Fluent Forms – Customizable Contact Forms, Survey, Quiz, & Conversational Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Address Spoofing in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.12 due to insufficient IP address validation and use of user-supplied HTTP headers as a primary method for IP retrieval. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers spoof their IP address and submit forms that may have IP-based restrictions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-techjewel
Product-Fluent Forms – Customizable Contact Forms, Survey, Quiz, & Conversational Form Builder
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-13798
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 30.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2025 | 04:21
Updated-22 Feb, 2025 | 15:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Post Grid and Gutenberg Blocks – ComboBlocks <= 2.3.5 - Unauthenticated Paid Order Creation

The Post Grid and Gutenberg Blocks – ComboBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized order creation in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.5. This is due to insufficient verification on form fields. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new orders for products and mark them as paid without actually completing a payment.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pickplugins
Product-Post Grid and Gutenberg Blocks – ComboBlocks
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2016-11032
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 26.87%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2020 | 13:38
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with M(6.0) software. An attacker can disable all Sound functionality by broadcasting an unprotected intent. The Samsung IDs are SVE-2016-7179 and SVE-2016-7182 (November 2016).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGoogle LLC
Product-androidn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-42857
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Government Technology Agency of Singapore Cyber Security Group (GovTech CSG)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Government Technology Agency of Singapore Cyber Security Group (GovTech CSG)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.56% / 67.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Mar, 2022 | 16:51
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 21:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Directory Traversal Partial Write at AgentDaServlet

It was discovered that the SteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent's (DSA) AgentDaServlet has directory traversal vulnerabilities at the "/api/appInternals/1.0/agent/da/pcf" API. The affected endpoint does not have any validation of the user's input that allows a malicious payload to be injected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-riverbedAternity
Product-steelcentral_appinternals_dynamic_sampling_agentSteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2024-10635
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Proofpoint Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Proofpoint Inc.
CVSS Score-6.1||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 17.39%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-28 Apr, 2025 | 20:36
Updated-10 May, 2025 | 00:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Enterprise Protection S/MIME Opaque Signature Attachment Scanning Bypass

Enterprise Protection contains an improper input validation vulnerability in attachment defense that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass attachment scanning security policy by sending a malicious S/MIME attachment with an opaque signature. When opened by a recipient in a downstream email client, the malicious attachment could cause partial loss of integrity and confidentiality to their system.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proofpointProofpoint
Product-enterprise_protectionEnterprise Protection
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-41138
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.57% / 67.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Oct, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Validity check for signed Frontier-specific extrinsic not called in block execution

Frontier is Substrate's Ethereum compatibility layer. In the newly introduced signed Frontier-specific extrinsic for `pallet-ethereum`, a large part of transaction validation logic was only called in transaction pool validation, but not in block execution. Malicious validators can take advantage of this to put invalid transactions into a block. The attack is limited in that the signature is always validated, and the majority of the validation is done again in the subsequent `pallet-evm` execution logic. However, do note that a chain ID replay attack was possible. In addition, spamming attacks are of main concerns, while they are limited by Substrate block size limits and other factors. The issue is patched in commit `146bb48849e5393004be5c88beefe76fdf009aba`.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parityparitytech
Product-frontierfrontier
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-39193
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.29% / 52.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Sep, 2021 | 17:45
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 01:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Transaction validity oversight in pallet-ethereum

Frontier is Substrate's Ethereum compatibility layer. Prior to commit number 0b962f218f0cdd796dadfe26c3f09e68f7861b26, a bug in `pallet-ethereum` can cause invalid transactions to be included in the Ethereum block state in `pallet-ethereum` due to not validating the input data size. Any invalid transactions included this way have no possibility to alter the internal Ethereum or Substrate state. The transaction will appear to have be included, but is of no effect as it is rejected by the EVM engine. The impact is further limited by Substrate extrinsic size constraints. A patch is available in commit number 0b962f218f0cdd796dadfe26c3f09e68f7861b26. There are no workarounds aside from applying the patch.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parityparitytech
Product-frontierfrontier
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-1284
Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
CVE-2023-6835
Matching Score-4
Assigner-WSO2 LLC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-WSO2 LLC
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 47.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2023 | 09:16
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 08:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable due to lack of server-side input validation in the Forum feature, API rating could be manipulated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-WSO2 LLC
Product-iot_serverapi_managerWSO2 API ManagerWSO2 IoT Server
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-52368
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Feb, 2024 | 03:38
Updated-13 Mar, 2025 | 14:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Input verification vulnerability in the account module.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause features to perform abnormally.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-emuiharmonyosHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-35247
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SolarWinds
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SolarWinds
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-4.98% / 89.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2022 | 22:39
Updated-30 Jul, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Known KEV||Action Due Date - 2022-02-04||Apply updates per vendor instructions.
Improper Input Validation Vulnerability in Serv-U

Serv-U web login screen to LDAP authentication was allowing characters that were not sufficiently sanitized. SolarWinds has updated the input mechanism to perform additional validation and sanitization. Please Note: No downstream affect has been detected as the LDAP servers ignored improper characters. To insure proper input validation is completed in all environments. SolarWinds recommends scheduling an update to the latest version of Serv-U.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SolarWinds Worldwide, LLC.
Product-serv-uServ-UServ-U
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-49081
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 47.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Nov, 2023 | 06:56
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 21:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
aiohttp's ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection via version

aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Improper validation made it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP request (e.g. to insert a new header) or create a new HTTP request if the attacker controls the HTTP version. The vulnerability only occurs if the attacker can control the HTTP version of the request. This issue has been patched in version 3.9.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-aiohttpaio-libs
Product-aiohttpaiohttp
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-32697
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.40% / 59.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Jun, 2021 | 18:15
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Form validation can be skipped

neos/forms is an open source framework to build web forms. By crafting a special `GET` request containing a valid form state, a form can be submitted without invoking any validators. Form state is secured with an HMAC that is still verified. That means that this issue can only be exploited if Form Finishers cause side effects even if no form values have been sent. Form Finishers can be adjusted in a way that they only execute an action if the submitted form contains some expected data. Alternatively a custom Finisher can be added as first finisher. This regression was introduced with https://github.com/neos/form/commit/049d415295be8d4a0478ccba97dba1bb81649567

Action-Not Available
Vendor-neosneos
Product-formform
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-49082
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.34%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Nov, 2023 | 20:07
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 21:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
aiohttp's ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection via method

aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Improper validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP request (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request if the attacker controls the HTTP method. The vulnerability occurs only if the attacker can control the HTTP method (GET, POST etc.) of the request. If the attacker can control the HTTP version of the request it will be able to modify the request (request smuggling). This issue has been patched in version 3.9.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-aiohttpaio-libs
Product-aiohttpaiohttp
CWE ID-CWE-93
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-49796
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.66% / 70.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Dec, 2023 | 20:38
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 22:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
MindsDB Arbitrary File Write vulnerability

MindsDB connects artificial intelligence models to real time data. Versions prior to 23.11.4.1 contain a limited file write vulnerability in `file.py` Users should use MindsDB's `staging` branch or v23.11.4.1, which contain a fix for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mindsdbmindsdb
Product-mindsdbmindsdb
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-28170
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Eclipse Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 23.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2021 | 21:55
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In the Jakarta Expression Language implementation 3.0.3 and earlier, a bug in the ELParserTokenManager enables invalid EL expressions to be evaluated as if they were valid.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-quarkusOracle CorporationEclipse Foundation AISBL
Product-jakarta_expression_languagecommunications_cloud_native_core_policyweblogic_serverquarkusJakarta Expression Language Implementation
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-917
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection')
CVE-2021-27418
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 44.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Mar, 2022 | 19:46
Updated-16 Apr, 2025 | 16:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
GE UR family input validation

GE UR firmware versions prior to version 8.1x supports web interface with read-only access. The device fails to properly validate user input, making it possible to perform cross-site scripting attacks, which may be used to send a malicious script. Also, UR Firmware web server does not perform HTML encoding of user-supplied strings.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-geGE
Product-multilin_l90_firmwaremultilin_b90_firmwaremultilin_b30_firmwaremultilin_c60multilin_b90multilin_t35_firmwaremultilin_c30multilin_c30_firmwaremultilin_f60_firmwaremultilin_n60multilin_t35multilin_c60_firmwaremultilin_l30_firmwaremultilin_c70multilin_c95_firmwaremultilin_c70_firmwaremultilin_g30_firmwaremultilin_c95multilin_n60_firmwaremultilin_l60multilin_m60_firmwaremultilin_t60multilin_t60_firmwaremultilin_g60_firmwaremultilin_l90multilin_g60multilin_f60multilin_m60multilin_g30multilin_f35_firmwaremultilin_l30multilin_d30_firmwaremultilin_d60multilin_d60_firmwaremultilin_b30multilin_l60_firmwaremultilin_f35multilin_d30UR family
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CVE-2021-30004
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 52.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Apr, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In wpa_supplicant and hostapd 2.9, forging attacks may occur because AlgorithmIdentifier parameters are mishandled in tls/pkcs1.c and tls/x509v3.c.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-w1.fin/a
Product-wpa_supplicanthostapdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-46763
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Nov, 2023 | 09:33
Updated-04 Sep, 2024 | 15:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability of background app permission management in the framework module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause background apps to start maliciously.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-emuiharmonyosHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-11890
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 50.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2020 | 16:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.17. Improper input validations in the usergroup table class could lead to a broken ACL configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJoomla!
Product-joomla\!n/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2019-12433
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Mar, 2020 | 13:45
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 11.7 through 11.11. It has Improper Input Validation. Restricted visibility settings allow creating internal projects in private groups, leading to multiple permission issues.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-26138
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.29% / 52.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jun, 2021 | 17:35
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In SilverStripe through 4.6.0-rc1, a FormField with square brackets in the field name skips validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSilverstripe
Product-silverstripen/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-21705
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 45.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Oct, 2021 | 04:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 04:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect URL validation in FILTER_VALIDATE_URL

In PHP versions 7.3.x below 7.3.29, 7.4.x below 7.4.21 and 8.0.x below 8.0.8, when using URL validation functionality via filter_var() function with FILTER_VALIDATE_URL parameter, an URL with invalid password field can be accepted as valid. This can lead to the code incorrectly parsing the URL and potentially leading to other security implications - like contacting a wrong server or making a wrong access decision.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationThe PHP Group
Product-clustered_data_ontapsd-wan_awarephpPHP
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-10693
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 7.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 May, 2020 | 13:03
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in Hibernate Validator version 6.1.2.Final. A bug in the message interpolation processor enables invalid EL expressions to be evaluated as if they were valid. This flaw allows attackers to bypass input sanitation (escaping, stripping) controls that developers may have put in place when handling user-controlled data in error messages.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-quarkusHibernateOracle CorporationRed Hat, Inc.IBM Corporation
Product-weblogic_serverwebsphere_application_serverquarkusenterprise_linuxsatellitehibernate_validatorjboss_enterprise_application_platformsatellite_capsulehibernate-validator
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-45648
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.54% / 66.62%
||
7 Day CHG-0.02%
Published-10 Oct, 2023 | 18:38
Updated-21 Aug, 2025 | 13:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Tomcat: Trailer header parsing too lenient

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat.Tomcat from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.0-M11, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.13, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.81 and from 8.5.0 through 8.5.93 did not correctly parse HTTP trailer headers. A specially crafted, invalid trailer header could cause Tomcat to treat a single request as multiple requests leading to the possibility of request smuggling when behind a reverse proxy. Older, EOL versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.0-M12 onwards, 10.1.14 onwards, 9.0.81 onwards or 8.5.94 onwards, which fix the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-debian_linuxtomcatApache Tomcattomcat
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found