Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2024-32646

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:21
Updated At-02 Aug, 2024 | 02:13
Rejected At-
Credits

vyper performs double eval of the slice args when buffer from adhoc locations

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `slice` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when the buffer argument is either `msg.data`, `self.code` or `<address>.code` and either the `start` or `length` arguments have side-effects. It can be easily triggered only with the versions `<0.3.4` as `0.3.4` introduced the unique symbol fence. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:25 Apr, 2024 | 17:21
Updated At:02 Aug, 2024 | 02:13
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
vyper performs double eval of the slice args when buffer from adhoc locations

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `slice` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when the buffer argument is either `msg.data`, `self.code` or `<address>.code` and either the `start` or `length` arguments have side-effects. It can be easily triggered only with the versions `<0.3.4` as `0.3.4` introduced the unique symbol fence. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available.

Affected Products
Vendor
vyperlang
Product
vyper
Versions
Affected
  • <= 0.3.10
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-20CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-20
Description: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-r56x-j438-vw5m
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-r56x-j438-vw5m
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Vendor
vyperlang
Product
vyper
CPEs
  • cpe:2.3:a:vyperlang:vyper:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Default Status
unknown
Versions
Affected
  • *
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
2. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-r56x-j438-vw5m
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-r56x-j438-vw5m
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:25 Apr, 2024 | 18:15
Updated At:02 Jan, 2025 | 22:52

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `slice` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when the buffer argument is either `msg.data`, `self.code` or `<address>.code` and either the `start` or `length` arguments have side-effects. It can be easily triggered only with the versions `<0.3.4` as `0.3.4` introduced the unique symbol fence. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Secondary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CPE Matches

vyperlang
vyperlang
>>vyper>>Versions before 0.4.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:vyperlang:vyper:*:*:*:*:*:python:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-20Secondarysecurity-advisories@github.com
NVD-CWE-OtherPrimarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-20
Type: Secondary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: NVD-CWE-Other
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-r56x-j438-vw5msecurity-advisories@github.com
Vendor Advisory
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-r56x-j438-vw5maf854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-r56x-j438-vw5m
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-r56x-j438-vw5m
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

101Records found

CVE-2024-32645
Matching Score-10
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.77% / 72.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:18
Updated-02 Jan, 2025 | 22:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper performs incorrect topic logging in raw_log

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, incorrect values can be logged when `raw_log` builtin is called with memory or storage arguments to be used as topics. A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. The `build_IR` function of the `RawLog` class fails to properly unwrap the variables provided as topics. Consequently, incorrect values are logged as topics. As of time of publication, no fixed version is available.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-37902
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Jul, 2023 | 20:05
Updated-03 Oct, 2024 | 18:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vyper's ecrecover can return undefined data if signature does not verify

Vyper is a Pythonic programming language that targets the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Prior to version 0.3.10, the ecrecover precompile does not fill the output buffer if the signature does not verify. However, the ecrecover builtin will still return whatever is at memory location 0. This means that the if the compiler has been convinced to write to the 0 memory location with specially crafted data (generally, this can happen with a hashmap access or immutable read) just before the ecrecover, a signature check might pass on an invalid signature. Version 0.3.10 contains a patch for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-252
Unchecked Return Value
CVE-2023-42441
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Sep, 2023 | 20:19
Updated-24 Sep, 2024 | 18:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vyper has incorrect re-entrancy lock when key is empty string

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Starting in version 0.2.9 and prior to version 0.3.10, locks of the type `@nonreentrant("")` or `@nonreentrant('')` do not produce reentrancy checks at runtime. This issue is fixed in version 0.3.10. As a workaround, ensure the lock name is a non-empty string.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-833
Deadlock
CWE ID-CWE-667
Improper Locking
CVE-2023-41052
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.07% / 21.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Sep, 2023 | 17:36
Updated-26 Sep, 2024 | 18:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vyper: incorrect order of evaluation of side effects for some builtins

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language. In affected versions the order of evaluation of the arguments of the builtin functions `uint256_addmod`, `uint256_mulmod`, `ecadd` and `ecmul` does not follow source order. This behaviour is problematic when the evaluation of one of the arguments produces side effects that other arguments depend on. A patch is currently being developed on pull request #3583. When using builtins from the list above, users should make sure that the arguments of the expression do not produce side effects or, if one does, that no other argument is dependent on those side effects.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-670
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
CVE-2023-32675
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.18% / 40.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 May, 2023 | 19:46
Updated-12 Feb, 2025 | 16:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nonpayable default functions are sometimes payable in vyper

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In contracts with more than one regular nonpayable function, it is possible to send funds to the default function, even if the default function is marked `nonpayable`. This applies to contracts compiled with vyper versions prior to 0.3.8. This issue was fixed by the removal of the global `calldatasize` check in commit `02339dfda`. Users are advised to upgrade to version 0.3.8. Users unable to upgrade should avoid use of nonpayable default functions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-670
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
CVE-2023-40015
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.07% / 22.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Sep, 2023 | 17:39
Updated-19 Nov, 2024 | 16:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vyper: reversed order of side effects for some operations

Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language. For the following (probably non-exhaustive) list of expressions, the compiler evaluates the arguments from right to left instead of left to right. `unsafe_add, unsafe_sub, unsafe_mul, unsafe_div, pow_mod256, |, &, ^ (bitwise operators), bitwise_or (deprecated), bitwise_and (deprecated), bitwise_xor (deprecated), raw_call, <, >, <=, >=, ==, !=, in, not in (when lhs and rhs are enums)`. This behaviour becomes a problem when the evaluation of one of the arguments produces side effects that other arguments depend on. The following expressions can produce side-effect: state modifying external call , state modifying internal call, `raw_call`, `pop()` when used on a Dynamic Array stored in the storage, `create_minimal_proxy_to`, `create_copy_of`, `create_from_blueprint`. This issue has not yet been patched. Users are advised to make sure that the arguments of the expression do not produce side effects or, if one does, that no other argument is dependent on those side effects.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-670
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
CVE-2024-32647
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.66% / 70.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:41
Updated-02 Jan, 2025 | 22:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper performs double eval of raw_args in create_from_blueprint

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `create_from_blueprint` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when `raw_args=True` and the `args` argument has side-effects. It can be seen that the `_build_create_IR` function of the `create_from_blueprint` builtin doesn't cache the mentioned `args` argument to the stack. As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack). No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions exist.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-95
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
CVE-2024-32481
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.58% / 80.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:00
Updated-05 May, 2025 | 17:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper's range(start, start + N) reverts for negative numbers

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. Starting in version 0.3.8 and prior to version 0.4.0b1, when looping over a `range` of the form `range(start, start + N)`, if `start` is negative, the execution will always revert. This issue is caused by an incorrect assertion inserted by the code generation of the range `stmt.parse_For_range()`. The issue arises when `start` is signed, instead of using `sle`, `le` is used and `start` is interpreted as an unsigned integer for the comparison. If it is a negative number, its 255th bit is set to `1` and is hence interpreted as a very large unsigned integer making the assertion always fail. Any contract having a `range(start, start + N)` where `start` is a signed integer with the possibility for `start` to be negative is affected. If a call goes through the loop while supplying a negative `start` the execution will revert. Version 0.4.0b1 fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-681
Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types
CVE-2024-32648
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 55.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:48
Updated-02 Jan, 2025 | 22:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper default functions don't respect nonreentrancy keys

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. Prior to version 0.3.0, default functions don't respect nonreentrancy keys and the lock isn't emitted. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, using a lock on a `default` function is a very sparsely used pattern. As such, the impact is low. Version 0.3.0 contains a patch for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-667
Improper Locking
CVE-2024-32649
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.89% / 74.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Apr, 2024 | 17:53
Updated-02 Jan, 2025 | 22:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
vyper performs double eval of the argument of sqrt

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `sqrt` builtin can result in double eval vulnerability when the argument has side-effects. It can be seen that the `build_IR` function of the `sqrt` builtin doesn't cache the argument to the stack. As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack). No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-95
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
CVE-2024-24567
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jan, 2024 | 20:17
Updated-16 Jun, 2025 | 18:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vyperlangvyperlang
Product-vypervyper
CWE ID-CWE-754
Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
CVE-2021-21705
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 45.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Oct, 2021 | 04:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 04:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect URL validation in FILTER_VALIDATE_URL

In PHP versions 7.3.x below 7.3.29, 7.4.x below 7.4.21 and 8.0.x below 8.0.8, when using URL validation functionality via filter_var() function with FILTER_VALIDATE_URL parameter, an URL with invalid password field can be accepted as valid. This can lead to the code incorrectly parsing the URL and potentially leading to other security implications - like contacting a wrong server or making a wrong access decision.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationThe PHP Group
Product-clustered_data_ontapsd-wan_awarephpPHP
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2024-10635
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Proofpoint Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Proofpoint Inc.
CVSS Score-6.1||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 17.42%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-28 Apr, 2025 | 20:36
Updated-10 May, 2025 | 00:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Enterprise Protection S/MIME Opaque Signature Attachment Scanning Bypass

Enterprise Protection contains an improper input validation vulnerability in attachment defense that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass attachment scanning security policy by sending a malicious S/MIME attachment with an opaque signature. When opened by a recipient in a downstream email client, the malicious attachment could cause partial loss of integrity and confidentiality to their system.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proofpointProofpoint
Product-enterprise_protectionEnterprise Protection
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-6835
Matching Score-4
Assigner-WSO2 LLC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-WSO2 LLC
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 47.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2023 | 09:16
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 08:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable due to lack of server-side input validation in the Forum feature, API rating could be manipulated.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-WSO2 LLC
Product-iot_serverapi_managerWSO2 API ManagerWSO2 IoT Server
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-34350
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 6.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Feb, 2023 | 19:12
Updated-25 Mar, 2025 | 13:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM API Connect security bypass

IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.5.0, 10.0.1.0 through 10.0.1.7, and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.20 is vulnerable to External Service Interaction attack, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to induce the application to perform server-side DNS lookups or HTTP requests to arbitrary domain names. By submitting suitable payloads, an attacker can cause the application server to attack other systems that it can interact with. IBM X-Force ID: 230264.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-api_connectAPI Connect
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-52368
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Feb, 2024 | 03:38
Updated-13 Mar, 2025 | 14:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Input verification vulnerability in the account module.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause features to perform abnormally.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-emuiharmonyosHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-20764
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 50.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Aug, 2021 | 05:36
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper input validation vulnerability in Attaching Files of Cybozu Garoon 4.0.0 to 5.0.2 allows a remote attacker to alter the data of Attaching Files.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cybozu, Inc.
Product-garoonCybozu Garoon
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-32248
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 43.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2022 | 20:27
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 07:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Due to missing input validation in the Manage Checkbooks component of SAP S/4HANA - version 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, an attacker could insert or edit the value of an existing field in the database. This leads to an impact on the integrity of the data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SAP SE
Product-s\/4hanaSAP S/4HANA
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-9743
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Adobe Systems Incorporated
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.32% / 86.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2020 | 16:36
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HTML injection in AEM's content editor component

AEM versions 6.5.5.0 (and below), 6.4.8.1 (and below), 6.3.3.8 (and below) and 6.2 SP1-CFP20 (and below) are affected by an HTML injection vulnerability in the content editor component that allows unauthenticated users to craft an HTTP request that includes arbitrary HTML code in a parameter value. An attacker could then use the malicious GET request to lure victims to perform unsafe actions in the page (ex. phishing).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Adobe Inc.
Product-experience_managerExperience Manager
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-79
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
CVE-2016-10765
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 47.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Jul, 2019 | 16:10
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

edx-platform before 2016-06-10 allows account activation with a spoofed e-mail address.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-edxn/a
Product-edx-platformn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2025-8097
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 32.26%
||
7 Day CHG+0.04%
Published-26 Jul, 2025 | 06:43
Updated-29 Jul, 2025 | 14:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WoodMart - Multipurpose WooCommerce Theme <= 8.2.6 - Improper Input Validation Leading to Unauthenticated Cart Manipulation

The WoodMart theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Input Validation in all versions up to, and including, 8.2.6. This is due to insufficient validation of the qty parameter in the woodmart_update_cart_item function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to manipulate cart quantities using fractional values, allowing them to obtain products for free by setting extremely small quantities (e.g., 0.00001) that round cart totals to $0.00, effectively bypassing payment requirements and allowing unauthorized acquisition of virtual or downloadable products.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-XTemos Studio
Product-Woodmart
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-25839
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Mar, 2022 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Input Validation

The package url-js before 2.1.0 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation due to improper parsing, which makes it is possible for the hostname to be spoofed. http://\\\\\\\\localhost and http://localhost are the same URL. However, the hostname is not parsed as localhost, and the backslash is reflected as it is.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-url-js_projectn/a
Product-url-jsurl-js
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-7070
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-18.48% / 94.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Oct, 2020 | 14:14
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PHP parses encoded cookie names so malicious `__Host-` cookies can be sent

In PHP versions 7.2.x below 7.2.34, 7.3.x below 7.3.23 and 7.4.x below 7.4.11, when PHP is processing incoming HTTP cookie values, the cookie names are url-decoded. This may lead to cookies with prefixes like __Host confused with cookies that decode to such prefix, thus leading to an attacker being able to forge cookie which is supposed to be secure. See also CVE-2020-8184 for more information.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Tenable, Inc.openSUSEFedora ProjectNetApp, Inc.Canonical Ltd.Debian GNU/LinuxThe PHP Group
Product-ubuntu_linuxclustered_data_ontapphpdebian_linuxfedoratenable.scleapPHP
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-565
Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking
CVE-2023-49796
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.66% / 70.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Dec, 2023 | 20:38
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 22:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
MindsDB Arbitrary File Write vulnerability

MindsDB connects artificial intelligence models to real time data. Versions prior to 23.11.4.1 contain a limited file write vulnerability in `file.py` Users should use MindsDB's `staging` branch or v23.11.4.1, which contain a fix for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mindsdbmindsdb
Product-mindsdbmindsdb
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-24723
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 35.92%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-03 Mar, 2022 | 20:35
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 18:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Input Validation in URI.js

URI.js is a Javascript URL mutation library. Before version 1.19.9, whitespace characters are not removed from the beginning of the protocol, so URLs are not parsed properly. This issue has been patched in version 1.19.9. Removing leading whitespace from values before passing them to URI.parse can be used as a workaround.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-uri.js_projectmedialize
Product-uri.jsURI.js
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-6261
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 40.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jul, 2020 | 12:55
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

SAP Solution Manager (Trace Analysis), version 7.20, allows an attacker to perform a log injection into the trace file, due to Incomplete XML Validation. The readability of the trace file is impaired.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SAP SE
Product-solution_managerSAP Solution Manager (Trace Analysis)
CWE ID-CWE-116
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-49081
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 47.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Nov, 2023 | 06:56
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 21:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
aiohttp's ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection via version

aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Improper validation made it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP request (e.g. to insert a new header) or create a new HTTP request if the attacker controls the HTTP version. The vulnerability only occurs if the attacker can control the HTTP version of the request. This issue has been patched in version 3.9.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-aiohttpaio-libs
Product-aiohttpaiohttp
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-14338
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.59% / 68.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Sep, 2020 | 14:06
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in Wildfly's implementation of Xerces, specifically in the way the XMLSchemaValidator class in the JAXP component of Wildfly enforced the "use-grammar-pool-only" feature. This flaw allows a specially-crafted XML file to manipulate the validation process in certain cases. This issue is the same flaw as CVE-2020-14621, which affected OpenJDK, and uses a similar code. This flaw affects all Xerces JBoss versions before 2.12.0.SP3.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-xercesWildfly
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-49082
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.35%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Nov, 2023 | 20:07
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 21:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
aiohttp's ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection via method

aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Improper validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP request (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request if the attacker controls the HTTP method. The vulnerability occurs only if the attacker can control the HTTP method (GET, POST etc.) of the request. If the attacker can control the HTTP version of the request it will be able to modify the request (request smuggling). This issue has been patched in version 3.9.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-aiohttpaio-libs
Product-aiohttpaiohttp
CWE ID-CWE-93
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-20952
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 25.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 15:27
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 02:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the scanning engines of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Web Appliance, formerly known as Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA), could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured rule, thereby allowing traffic onto a network that should have been blocked. This vulnerability exists because malformed, encoded traffic is not properly detected. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting through an affected device to a malicious server and receiving malformed HTTP responses. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass an explicit block rule and receive traffic that should have been rejected by the device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-asyncoss695s195s395Cisco Secure Web Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-36175
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 40.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jan, 2021 | 14:31
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Ninja Forms plugin before 3.4.27.1 for WordPress allows attackers to bypass validation via the email field.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSaturday Drive, INC
Product-ninja_formsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-3307
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 May, 2020 | 16:42
Updated-26 Nov, 2024 | 16:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Firepower Management Center Arbitrary Log File Write Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to write arbitrary entries to the log file on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send incorrect information to the system log on the affected system.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-secure_firewall_management_centerCisco Firepower Management Center
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-46763
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Huawei Technologies
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Nov, 2023 | 09:33
Updated-04 Sep, 2024 | 15:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability of background app permission management in the framework module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause background apps to start maliciously.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Product-emuiharmonyosHarmonyOSEMUI
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-3244
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.42% / 60.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jun, 2020 | 02:21
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 16:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco ASR 5000 Series Aggregation Services Routers Enhanced Charging Service Rule Bypass Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Enhanced Charging Service (ECS) functionality of Cisco ASR 5000 Series Aggregation Services Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the traffic classification rules on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of user traffic going through an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malformed HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the traffic classification rules and potentially avoid being charged for traffic consumption.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-starosasr_5000asr_5500asr_5700Cisco ASR 5000 Series Software
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2022-23814
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jan, 2023 | 20:56
Updated-09 Apr, 2025 | 14:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Failure to validate addresses provided by software to BIOS commands may result in a potential loss of integrity of guest memory in a confidential compute environment.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Product-milanpi-sp3_firmwaremilanpi-sp33rd Gen EPYC
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-26082
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 23.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Aug, 2023 | 20:49
Updated-09 Jul, 2025 | 13:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the zip decompression engine of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass content filters that are configured on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of password-protected zip files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious file inside a crafted zip-compressed file to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured content filters that would normally drop the email.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-email_security_appliance_c190asyncosemail_security_appliance_c390email_security_appliance_c380email_security_appliance_c170email_security_appliance_c680email_security_appliance_c690xemail_security_appliance_c690Cisco Secure Email
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-25768
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.31% / 53.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Oct, 2020 | 20:37
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Contao before 4.4.52, 4.9.x before 4.9.6, and 4.10.x before 4.10.1 have Improper Input Validation. It is possible to inject insert tags in front end forms which will be replaced when the page is rendered.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aContao Association
Product-contaon/a
CWE ID-CWE-74
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-26138
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.29% / 52.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jun, 2021 | 17:35
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In SilverStripe through 4.6.0-rc1, a FormField with square brackets in the field name skips validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSilverstripe
Product-silverstripen/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-45648
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.54% / 66.63%
||
7 Day CHG-0.02%
Published-10 Oct, 2023 | 18:38
Updated-21 Aug, 2025 | 13:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Tomcat: Trailer header parsing too lenient

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat.Tomcat from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.0-M11, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.13, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.81 and from 8.5.0 through 8.5.93 did not correctly parse HTTP trailer headers. A specially crafted, invalid trailer header could cause Tomcat to treat a single request as multiple requests leading to the possibility of request smuggling when behind a reverse proxy. Older, EOL versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.0-M12 onwards, 10.1.14 onwards, 9.0.81 onwards or 8.5.94 onwards, which fix the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-debian_linuxtomcatApache Tomcattomcat
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-42857
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Government Technology Agency of Singapore Cyber Security Group (GovTech CSG)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Government Technology Agency of Singapore Cyber Security Group (GovTech CSG)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.56% / 67.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Mar, 2022 | 16:51
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 21:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Directory Traversal Partial Write at AgentDaServlet

It was discovered that the SteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent's (DSA) AgentDaServlet has directory traversal vulnerabilities at the "/api/appInternals/1.0/agent/da/pcf" API. The affected endpoint does not have any validation of the user's input that allows a malicious payload to be injected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-riverbedAternity
Product-steelcentral_appinternals_dynamic_sampling_agentSteelCentral AppInternals Dynamic Sampling Agent
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CVE-2020-15109
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.21% / 42.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Aug, 2020 | 23:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ability to change order address without triggering address validations in solidus

In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipment costs associated with the new shipment. All stores with at least two shipping zones and different costs of shipment per zone are impacted. This problem comes from how checkout permitted attributes are structured. We have a single list of attributes that are permitted across the whole checkout, no matter the step that is being submitted. See the linked reference for more information. As a workaround, if it is not possible to upgrade to a supported patched version, please use this gist in the references section.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nebulabsolidusio
Product-solidussolidus
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-862
Missing Authorization
CVE-2013-4101
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 60.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2019 | 14:52
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 16:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cryptocat before 2.0.22 Link Markup Decorator HTML Handling Weakness

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cryptocat_projectn/a
Product-cryptocatn/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-41138
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.57% / 67.78%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Oct, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Validity check for signed Frontier-specific extrinsic not called in block execution

Frontier is Substrate's Ethereum compatibility layer. In the newly introduced signed Frontier-specific extrinsic for `pallet-ethereum`, a large part of transaction validation logic was only called in transaction pool validation, but not in block execution. Malicious validators can take advantage of this to put invalid transactions into a block. The attack is limited in that the signature is always validated, and the majority of the validation is done again in the subsequent `pallet-evm` execution logic. However, do note that a chain ID replay attack was possible. In addition, spamming attacks are of main concerns, while they are limited by Substrate block size limits and other factors. The issue is patched in commit `146bb48849e5393004be5c88beefe76fdf009aba`.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parityparitytech
Product-frontierfrontier
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-11890
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 50.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2020 | 16:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.17. Improper input validations in the usergroup table class could lead to a broken ACL configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJoomla!
Product-joomla\!n/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2020-10693
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 7.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 May, 2020 | 13:03
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in Hibernate Validator version 6.1.2.Final. A bug in the message interpolation processor enables invalid EL expressions to be evaluated as if they were valid. This flaw allows attackers to bypass input sanitation (escaping, stripping) controls that developers may have put in place when handling user-controlled data in error messages.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-quarkusHibernateOracle CorporationRed Hat, Inc.IBM Corporation
Product-weblogic_serverwebsphere_application_serverquarkusenterprise_linuxsatellitehibernate_validatorjboss_enterprise_application_platformsatellite_capsulehibernate-validator
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-41114
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.29% / 51.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Oct, 2021 | 17:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 02:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
HTTP Host Header Injection in Request Handling in Typo3

TYPO3 is an open source PHP based web content management system released under the GNU GPL. It has been discovered that TYPO3 CMS is susceptible to host spoofing due to improper validation of the HTTP Host header. TYPO3 uses the HTTP Host header, for example, to generate absolute URLs during the frontend rendering process. Since the host header itself is provided by the client, it can be forged to any value, even in a name-based virtual hosts environment. This vulnerability is the same as described in TYPO3-CORE-SA-2014-001 (CVE-2014-3941). A regression, introduced during TYPO3 v11 development, led to this situation. The already existing setting $GLOBALS['TYPO3_CONF_VARS']['SYS']['trustedHostsPattern'] (used as an effective mitigation strategy in previous TYPO3 versions) was not evaluated anymore, and reintroduced the vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-TYPO3 Association
Product-typo3typo3
CWE ID-CWE-644
Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2017-6955
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.88% / 74.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2017 | 08:55
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in by-email/by-email.php in the Invite Anyone plugin before 1.3.15 for WordPress. A user is able to change the subject and the body of the invitation mail that should be immutable, which facilitates a social engineering attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-teleogisticn/a
Product-invite_anyonen/a
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-38910
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.32% / 54.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Mar, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM DataPower Gateway V10CD, 10.0.1, and 2108.4.1 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by the improper validation of input. By sending a specially crafted JSON message, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to modify structure and fields. IBM X-Force ID: 209824.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-datapower_gatewayDataPower Gateway
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-39193
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.29% / 52.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Sep, 2021 | 17:45
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 01:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Transaction validity oversight in pallet-ethereum

Frontier is Substrate's Ethereum compatibility layer. Prior to commit number 0b962f218f0cdd796dadfe26c3f09e68f7861b26, a bug in `pallet-ethereum` can cause invalid transactions to be included in the Ethereum block state in `pallet-ethereum` due to not validating the input data size. Any invalid transactions included this way have no possibility to alter the internal Ethereum or Substrate state. The transaction will appear to have be included, but is of no effect as it is rejected by the EVM engine. The impact is further limited by Substrate extrinsic size constraints. A patch is available in commit number 0b962f218f0cdd796dadfe26c3f09e68f7861b26. There are no workarounds aside from applying the patch.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parityparitytech
Product-frontierfrontier
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-1284
Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
CVE-2023-3704
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In)
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Aug, 2023 | 06:42
Updated-04 Oct, 2024 | 19:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Modification Vulnerability in CP-Plus Digital Video Recorder

The vulnerability exists in CP-Plus DVR due to an improper input validation within the web-based management interface of the affected products. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted HTTP requests to the vulnerable device. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the remote attacker to change system time of the targeted device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Aditya Infotech LimitedCP PLUS (Aditya Group - Aditya Infotech Limited)
Product-cp-uvr-1601e2-hcp-uvr-0401l1b-4kh_firmwarecp-uvr-0801f1-hc_firmwarecp-uvr-0801k1b-hcp-uvr-1601e2-h_firmwarecp-uvr-0801k1-h_firmwarecp-uvr-1601e1-hccp-uvr-0808k1-hcp-uvr-1601e1-hcp-uvr-1601e1-h_firmwarecp-uvr-0401l1-4kh_firmwarecp-uvr-0808k1-h_firmwarecp-uvr-1601e1-hc_firmwarecp-uvr-0801k1-hcp-uvr-0801f1-hccp-uvr-0401l1b-4khcp-uvr-0801k1b-h_firmwarecp-uvr-0401l1-4khCP-UVR-1601E1-HC, CP-UVR-1601E2-H, CP-UVR-1601E1-H, CP-UVR-0801F1-HC, CP-UVR-0801K1-H, CP-UVR-0801K1B-H, CP-UVR-0808K1-H, CP-UVR-0401L1-4KH, CP-UVR-0401L1B-4KHcp-uvr-1601e2-hcp-uvr-0801k1b-hcp-uvr-0801k1-hcp-uvr-0401l1b-4khcp-uvr-0801f1-hccp-uvr-1601e1-hccp-uvr-0808k1-hcp-uvr-1601e1-hcp-uvr-0401l1-4kh
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found