Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Slideshow Gallery.This issue affects Slideshow Gallery: from n/a through 1.7.8.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Newsletters plugin <= 4.8.8 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Slideshow Gallery LITE plugin <= 1.7.6 versions.

The one-click-ssl plugin before 1.4.7 for WordPress has CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pixelpost 1.7.3 could allow remote attackers to change the admin password.

mccms v2.6.3 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in plainware.Com ShiftController Employee Shift Scheduling plugin <= 4.9.23 versions.

For Eclipse Che versions 6.16 to 7.3.0, with both authentication and TLS disabled, visiting a malicious web site could trigger the start of an arbitrary Che workspace. Che with no authentication and no TLS is not usually deployed on a public network but is often used for local installations (e.g. on personal laptops). In that case, even if the Che API is not exposed externally, some javascript running in the local browser is able to send requests to it.

The Single Post Exporter WordPress plugin through 1.1.1 does not have CSRF checks when saving its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and give access to the export feature to any role such as subscriber. Subscriber users would then be able to export an arbitrary post/page (such as private and password protected) via a direct URL

Southsoft GMIS 5.0 is vulnerable to CSRF attacks. Attackers can access other users' private information such as photos through CSRF. For example: any student's photo information can be accessed through /gmis/(S([1]))/student/grgl/PotoImageShow/?bh=[2]. Among them, the code in [1] is a random string generated according to the user's login related information. It can protect the user's identity, but it can not effectively prevent unauthorized access. The code in [2] is the student number of any student. The attacker can carry out CSRF attack on the system by modifying [2] without modifying [1].

WordPress before 5.2.4 does not properly consider type confusion during validation of the referer in the admin pages, possibly leading to CSRF.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the user interface of Fortinet FortiSIEM 5.2.5 could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to perform arbitrary actions using an authenticated user's session by persuading the victim to follow a malicious link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wpmet Wp Ultimate Review plugin <= 2.0.3 versions.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the user, including modifying the device configuration. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading an interface user to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the user. Software versions prior to 8.3.150.0, 8.5.135.0, and 8.8.100.0 are affected.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Whydonate Whydonate – FREE Donate button – Crowdfunding – Fundraising plugin <= 3.12.15 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PressTigers Simple Job Board plugin <= 2.10.3 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Robin Phillips Mobile Banner plugin <= 1.5 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in weDevs Happy Addons for Elementor plugin <= 3.8.2 versions.

Sitemagic CMS 4.4.1 is affected by a Cross-Site-Request-Forgery (CSRF) issue as it doesn't implement any method to validate incoming requests, allowing the execution of critical functionalities via spoofed requests. This behavior could be abused by a remote unauthenticated attacker to trick Sitemagic users into performing unwarranted actions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Robert Schulz (sprd.Net AG) Spreadshop plugin <= 1.6.5 versions.

TuziCMS 2.0.6 has index.php/manage/link/do_add CSRF.

joyplus-cms 1.6.0 has admin_ajax.php?action=savexml&tab=vodplay CSRF.

In the Reponsive Menu (free and Pro) WordPress plugins before 4.0.4, attackers could craft a request and trick an administrator into uploading a zip archive containing malicious PHP files. The attacker could then access those files to achieve remote code execution and further infect the targeted site.

diag_command.php in pfSense 2.4.4-p3 allows CSRF via the txtCommand or txtRecallBuffer field, as demonstrated by executing OS commands. This occurs because csrf_callback() produces a "CSRF token expired" error and a Try Again button when a CSRF token is missing.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins WebSphere Deployer Plugin 1.6.1 and earlier allows attackers to perform connection tests and determine whether files with an attacker-specified path exist on the Jenkins master file system.

XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform offering runtime services for applications built on top of it. In affected versions of `org.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform-logging-ui` it is possible to trick a user with programming rights into visiting a constructed url where e.g., by embedding an image with this URL in a document that is viewed by a user with programming rights which will evaluate an expression in the constructed url and execute it. This issue has been addressed in versions 13.10.11, 14.4.7, and 14.10. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Alauda DevOps Pipeline Plugin 2.3.2 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a `+server.js` file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods. SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different `Content-Type` header value. If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts. SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the `is_form_content_type` function call in the CSRF protection logic to include `text/plain`. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on `PUT`, `PATCH` and `DELETE` methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of `?_method= override` feature themselves in their `handle` hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be `PUT`/`PATCH`/`DELETE` when the browser issues a `POST` request.

D-Link DIR-601 B1 2.00NA devices have CSRF because no anti-CSRF token is implemented. A remote attacker could exploit this in conjunction with CVE-2019-16327 to enable remote router management and device compromise. NOTE: this is an end-of-life product.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Gerrit Trigger Plugin 2.30.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP URL or SSH server using attacker-specified credentials.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in NETSAS ENIGMA NMS version 65.0.0 and prior that could allow an attacker to be able to trick a victim into submitting a malicious manage_files.cgi request. This can be triggered via XSS or an IFRAME tag included within the site.

An issue was discovered in ConnectWise Control (formerly known as ScreenConnect) 19.3.25270.7185. CSRF can be used to send API requests.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Build Failure Analyzer Plugin 1.24.1 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins evaluate a computationally expensive regular expression.

The Tutor LMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.7.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'addon_enable_disable' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enable or disable addons via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Keith Solomon Configurable Tag Cloud (CTC) plugin <= 5.2 versions.

A vulnerability was found in Exit Strategy Plugin 1.55 on WordPress and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function exitpageadmin of the file exitpage.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 1.59 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as d964b8e961b2634158719f3328f16eda16ce93ac. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-225266 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fugu Maintenance Switch plugin <= 1.5.2 versions.

JetBrains YouTrack versions before 2019.1 had a CSRF vulnerability on the settings page.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wp.Insider, wpaffiliatemgr Affiliates Manager plugin <= 2.9.20 versions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OctoPerf Load Testing Plugin Plugin 4.5.2 and earlier allows attackers to connect to a previously configured Octoperf server using attacker-specified credentials.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in codeboxr CBX Currency Converter plugin <= 3.0.3 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Amit Agarwal Google XML Sitemap for Images plugin <= 2.1.3 versions.

An issue was discovered in PRiSE adAS 1.7.0. Forms have no CSRF protection, letting an attacker execute actions as the administrator.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CreativeMindsSolutions CM On Demand Search And Replace plugin <= 1.3.0 versions.

The Button Generator WordPress plugin before 2.3.3 within the wow-company admin menu page allows to include() arbitrary file with PHP extension (as well as with data:// or http:// protocols), thus leading to CSRF RCE.

D-Link DIR-655 C devices before 3.02B05 BETA03 allow CSRF for the entire management console.

CSRF vulnerability in Smoothwall Express 3.

index.php/admin/permissions in Ignited CMS through 2017-02-19 allows CSRF to add an administrator.

In OSIsoft PI Web API and prior, the affected product is vulnerable to a direct attack due to a cross-site request forgery protection setting that has not taken effect.

A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V2.0 SP1). Some parts of the web application are not protected against Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker that is able to trigger requests of a logged-in user to the application. The vulnerability could allow switching the connectivity state of a user or a device. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.