FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/layout/add
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/page/add.
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/layout/delete/1
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/snippet/add.
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /admin/?/user/add
FrogCMS V0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/plugin/file_manager/delete/123
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/plugin/file_manager/create_file.
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/snippet/edit/3.
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/layout/edit/1.
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/snippet/delete/3.
Frog CMS 0.9.5 has admin/?/user/edit/1 CSRF.
An issue was discovered in Frog CMS 0.9.5. There is a reflected Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability via the file[current_name] parameter to the admin/?/plugin/file_manager/rename URI. This can be used in conjunction with CSRF.
FrogCMS V0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/plugin/file_manager/rename
FrogCMS V0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/plugin/file_manager/create_directory
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/page/delete/10.
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/vpsApiData_deal.php?mudi=del
The Similarity WordPress plugin through 3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when resetting its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin reset them via a CSRF attack
The WP Sticky Button WordPress plugin before 1.4.1 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when saving its settings, allowing unauthenticated users to update them. Furthermore, due to the lack of escaping in some of them, it could lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/type_deal.php?mudi=del
idccms V1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/vpsClass_deal.php?mudi=add
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/idcProType_deal.php?mudi=add&nohrefStr=close
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/infoType_deal.php?mudi=rev&nohrefStr=close.
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/sysImages_deal.php?mudi=infoSet.
Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises) Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/type_deal.php?mudi=add.
idccms V1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /admin/vpsCompany_deal.php?mudi=add&nohrefStr=close
idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/ca_deal.php?mudi=add&nohrefStr=close.
The edd-google-sheet-connector-pro WordPress plugin before 1.4, Easy Digital Downloads Google Sheet Connector WordPress plugin before 1.6.6 does not have CSRF check when updating its Access Code, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin change the access code to an arbitrary one via a CSRF attack
The AI ChatBot WordPress plugin before 4.4.9 does not have authorisation and CSRF in the AJAX action responsible to update the OpenAI settings, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to update them. Furthermore, due to the lack of escaping of the settings, this could also lead to Stored XSS
The RapidExpCart WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not sanitize and escape the url parameter in the rapidexpcart endpoint before storing it and outputting it back in the page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability which could be used against high-privilege users such as admin, furthermore lack of csrf protection means an attacker can trick a logged in admin to perform the attack by submitting a hidden form.
BOSSCMS v3.10 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in name="head_code" or name="foot_code."
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chamilo LMS 1.11.26 "/main/social/home.php," allows attackers to initiate a request that posts a fake post onto the user's social wall without their consent or knowledge.
Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Create event section in Pandora FMS Console v766 and lower. An attacker typically exploits this vulnerability by injecting XSS payloads on popular pages of a site or passing a link to a victim, tricking them into viewing the page that contains the stored XSS payload.
DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /dede/media_edit.php.
The Quick Subscribe WordPress plugin through 1.7.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and leading to Stored XSS due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping in some of them
The Sharebar WordPress plugin through 1.4.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping in some of them
There is a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Pandora FMS v765 in the network maps editing functionality. An attacker could modify a network map, including on purpose the name of an XSS payload. Once created, if a user with admin privileges clicks on the edited network maps, the XSS payload will be executed. The exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an atacker to steal the value of the admin user´s cookie.
The pagebar WordPress plugin before 2.70 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitisation in some of them, it could also lead to Stored XSS issues
The WP-chgFontSize WordPress plugin through 1.8 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping
The Autolinks WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, and does not sanitise as well as escape them, which could allow attackers to perform Stored Cross-Site scripting against a logged in admin via a CSRF attack
The Multi-page Toolkit WordPress plugin through 2.6 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping as well
The RB Internal Links WordPress plugin through 2.0.16 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack, as well as perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping
The Photo Gallery by 10Web WordPress plugin before 1.8.3 does not validate and escape some parameters before outputting them back in in JS code later on in another page, which could lead to Stored XSS issue when an attacker makes a logged in admin open a malicious URL or page under their control.
Vulnerability in the Oracle iSupport product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle iSupport. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle iSupport, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle iSupport accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle iSupport accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).
The Email Keep WordPress plugin through 1.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
The Smart Forms WordPress plugin before 2.6.94 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged-in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks, such as editing entries, and we consider it a medium risk.
The Bitcoin / Altcoin Faucet WordPress plugin through 1.6.0 does not have any CSRF check when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping, it could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues
A CSRF vulnerability exists within GitLab CE/EE from versions 13.11 before 16.10.6, from 16.11 before 16.11.3, from 17.0 before 17.0.1. By leveraging this vulnerability, an attacker could exfiltrate anti-CSRF tokens via the Kubernetes Agent Server (KAS).
The lasTunes WordPress plugin through 3.6.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack
The Voting Record WordPress plugin through 2.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack