Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2024-45159

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-05 Sep, 2024 | 00:00
Updated At-13 Mar, 2025 | 19:47
Rejected At-
Credits

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1. With TLS 1.3, when a server enables optional authentication of the client, if the client-provided certificate does not have appropriate values in if keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions, then the return value of mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() would incorrectly have the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits clear. As a result, an attacker that had a certificate valid for uses other than TLS client authentication would nonetheless be able to use it for TLS client authentication. Only TLS 1.3 servers were affected, and only with optional authentication (with required authentication, the handshake would be aborted with a fatal alert).

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:05 Sep, 2024 | 00:00
Updated At:13 Mar, 2025 | 19:47
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1. With TLS 1.3, when a server enables optional authentication of the client, if the client-provided certificate does not have appropriate values in if keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions, then the return value of mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() would incorrectly have the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits clear. As a result, an attacker that had a certificate valid for uses other than TLS client authentication would nonetheless be able to use it for TLS client authentication. Only TLS 1.3 servers were affected, and only with optional authentication (with required authentication, the handshake would be aborted with a fatal alert).

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/
N/A
https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/
N/A
https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2024-08-3/
N/A
Hyperlink: https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2024-08-3/
Resource: N/A
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-295CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-295
Description: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.19.8CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.8
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:05 Sep, 2024 | 19:15
Updated At:13 Mar, 2025 | 20:15

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1. With TLS 1.3, when a server enables optional authentication of the client, if the client-provided certificate does not have appropriate values in if keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions, then the return value of mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() would incorrectly have the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits clear. As a result, an attacker that had a certificate valid for uses other than TLS client authentication would nonetheless be able to use it for TLS client authentication. Only TLS 1.3 servers were affected, and only with optional authentication (with required authentication, the handshake would be aborted with a fatal alert).

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.19.8CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Secondary3.19.8CRITICAL
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.8
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 9.8
Base severity: CRITICAL
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CPE Matches

Arm Limited
arm
>>mbed_tls>>Versions from 3.2.0(inclusive) to 3.6.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:arm:mbed_tls:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-295Secondary134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Secondary
Source: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/cve@mitre.org
Release Notes
https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/cve@mitre.org
Issue Tracking
https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2024-08-3/cve@mitre.org
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/releases/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Release Notes
Hyperlink: https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Issue Tracking
Hyperlink: https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2024-08-3/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

78Records found

CVE-2018-15387
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.16% / 37.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Oct, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-26 Nov, 2024 | 14:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco SD-WAN Solution Certificate Validation Bypass Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass certificate validation on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper certificate validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a system image signed with a crafted certificate to an affected device, bypassing the certificate validation. An exploit could allow an attacker to deploy a crafted system image.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-sd-wanCisco SD-WAN Solution
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-47758
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.74% / 71.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-31 Jan, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Nanoleaf firmware v7.1.1 and below is missing TLS verification, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code via a DNS hijacking attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nanoleafn/a
Product-nanoleaf_firmwaren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-25140
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.16% / 37.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Feb, 2024 | 00:00
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 20:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A default installation of RustDesk 1.2.3 on Windows places a WDKTestCert certificate under Trusted Root Certification Authorities with Enhanced Key Usage of Code Signing (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.3), valid from 2023 until 2033. This is potentially unwanted, e.g., because there is no public documentation of security measures for the private key, and arbitrary software could be signed if the private key were to be compromised. NOTE: the vendor's position is "we do not have EV cert, so we use test cert as a workaround." Insertion into Trusted Root Certification Authorities was the originally intended behavior, and the UI ensured that the certificate installation step (checked by default) was visible to the user before proceeding with the product installation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rustdeskn/arustdeskMicrosoft Corporation
Product-rustdeskwindowsn/arustdesk
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45597
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.17% / 38.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 14:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ComponentSpace.Saml2 4.4.0 Missing SSL Certificate Validation. NOTE: the vendor does not consider this a vulnerability because the report is only about use of certificates at the application layer (not the transport layer) and "Certificates are exchanged in a controlled fashion between entities within a trust relationship. This is why self-signed certificates may be used and why validating certificates isn’t as important as doing so for the transport layer certificates."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-componentspacen/a
Product-samln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-42813
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.25% / 47.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 14:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue existed in the handling of WKWebView. This issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in tvOS 16.1, iOS 16.1 and iPadOS 16, macOS Ventura 13, watchOS 9.1. Processing a maliciously crafted certificate may lead to arbitrary code execution.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-tvosmacoswatchosipadosiphone_oswatchOStvOSmacOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-29504
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 39.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Feb, 2024 | 15:58
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.5.2, contain a Missing Required Cryptographic Step Vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-bsafe_micro-edition-suitebsafe_crypto-c-micro-editionBSAFE Crypto-C Micro EditionDell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-20080
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MediaTek, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MediaTek, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-3.35% / 86.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jul, 2024 | 03:18
Updated-28 May, 2025 | 20:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In gnss service, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to improper certificate validation. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08720039; Issue ID: MSV-1424.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rdkcentralThe Linux FoundationGoogle LLCMediaTek Inc.
Product-mt6765mt8673mt6886mt6833rdk-bmt6885mt6891mt6980mt8666mt8667mt8678mt6879mt6785mt6853tyoctoandroidmt6985mt8676mt6890mt6789mt6875mt6873mt6989mt6853mt6990mt6877mt6761mt6889mt6855mt6895mt2735mt6880mt2737mt6893mt6781mt6983mt6883mt6768MT2735, MT2737, MT6761, MT6765, MT6768, MT6781, MT6785, MT6789, MT6833, MT6853, MT6853T, MT6855, MT6873, MT6875, MT6877, MT6879, MT6880, MT6883, MT6885, MT6886, MT6889, MT6890, MT6891, MT6893, MT6895, MT6980, MT6983, MT6985, MT6989, MT6990, MT8666, MT8667, MT8673, MT8676, MT8678mt6855mt6990mt6873mt6893mt2735mt6886mt6983mt8666mt6765mt6891mt6883mt8676mt6853tmt6880mt6875mt6761mt6889mt6768mt2737mt8678mt6985mt6890mt6833mt6885mt8673mt6989mt6877mt6781mt6853mt8667mt6980mt6895mt6789androidmt6785mt6879
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-1351
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MongoDB, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MongoDB, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 38.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Mar, 2024 | 16:10
Updated-11 Mar, 2025 | 16:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
MongoDB Server may allow successful untrusted connection

Under certain configurations of --tlsCAFile and tls.CAFile, MongoDB Server may skip peer certificate validation which may result in untrusted connections to succeed. This may effectively reduce the security guarantees provided by TLS and open connections that should have been closed due to failing certificate validation. This issue affects MongoDB Server v7.0 versions prior to and including 7.0.5, MongoDB Server v6.0 versions prior to and including 6.0.13, MongoDB Server v5.0 versions prior to and including 5.0.24 and MongoDB Server v4.4 versions prior to and including 4.4.28. Required Configuration : A server process will allow incoming connections to skip peer certificate validation if the server process was started with TLS enabled (net.tls.mode set to allowTLS, preferTLS, or requireTLS) and without a net.tls.CAFile configured.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-NetApp, Inc.MongoDB, Inc.
Product-mongodbastra_control_centerontap_toolsMongoDB Servermongodb
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-34831
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.15% / 36.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Sep, 2022 | 02:58
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 09:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Keyfactor PrimeKey EJBCA before 7.9.0, related to possible inconsistencies in DNS identifiers submitted in an ACME order and the corresponding CSR submitted during finalization. During the ACME enrollment process, an order is submitted containing an identifier for one or multiple dnsNames. These are validated properly in the ACME challenge. However, if the validation passes, a non-compliant client can include additional dnsNames the CSR sent to the finalize endpoint, resulting in EJBCA issuing a certificate including the identifiers that were not validated. This occurs even if the certificate profile is configured to not allow a DN override by the CSR.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-primekeyn/a
Product-ejbcan/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45100
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.45% / 62.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Feb, 2023 | 05:06
Updated-26 Mar, 2025 | 20:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 8.2.x-9.3.x, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a full compromise of the system.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_powerscale_onefsPowerScale OneFS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-31183
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.20% / 42.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-22 Apr, 2025 | 17:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
mTLS client verification is skipped in fs2 on Node.js

fs2 is a compositional, streaming I/O library for Scala. When establishing a server-mode `TLSSocket` using `fs2-io` on Node.js, the parameter `requestCert = true` is ignored, peer certificate verification is skipped, and the connection proceeds. The vulnerability is limited to: 1. `fs2-io` running on Node.js. The JVM TLS implementation is completely independent. 2. `TLSSocket`s in server-mode. Client-mode `TLSSocket`s are implemented via a different API. 3. mTLS as enabled via `requestCert = true` in `TLSParameters`. The default setting is `false` for server-mode `TLSSocket`s. It was introduced with the initial Node.js implementation of fs2-io in 3.1.0. A patch is released in v3.2.11. The requestCert = true parameter is respected and the peer certificate is verified. If verification fails, a SSLException is raised. If using an unpatched version on Node.js, do not use a server-mode TLSSocket with requestCert = true to establish a mTLS connection.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-typeleveltypelevel
Product-fs2fs2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-28907
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.21% / 43.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 May, 2021 | 12:43
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Incorrect SSL certificate validation in Nagios Fusion 4.1.8 and earlier allows for Escalation of Privileges or Code Execution as root via vectors related to download of an untrusted update package in upgrade_to_latest.sh.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNagios Enterprises, LLC
Product-fusionn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-32878
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.04% / 12.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jun, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-08 Jul, 2025 | 14:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered on COROS PACE 3 devices through 3.0808.0. It implements a function to connect the watch to a WLAN. This function is mainly for downloading firmware files. Before downloading firmware files, the watch requests some information about the firmware via HTTPS from the back-end API. However, the X.509 server certificate within the TLS handshake is not validated by the device. This allows an attacker within an active machine-in-the-middle position, using a TLS proxy and a self-signed certificate, to eavesdrop and manipulate the HTTPS communication. This could be abused, for example, for stealing the API access token of the assigned user account.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-yftechn/a
Product-coros_pace_3_firmwarecoros_pace_3n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-36041
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-4.7||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 0.87%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-15 Jun, 2025 | 12:51
Updated-24 Aug, 2025 | 11:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM MQ improper certificate validation

IBM MQ Operator LTS 2.0.0 through 2.0.29, MQ Operator CD 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.1.0 through 3.1.3, 3.3.0, 3.4.0, 3.4.1, 3.5.0, 3.5.1 through 3.5.3, and MQ Operator SC2 3.2.0 through 3.2.12 Native HA CRR could be configured with a private key and chain other than the intended key which could disclose sensitive information or allow the attacker to perform unauthorized actions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-supplied_mq_advanced_container_imagesmq_operatorMQ Operator
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-29331
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.32% / 54.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2025 | 00:00
Updated-10 Jul, 2025 | 14:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue in MHSanaei 3x-ui before v.2.5.3 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the management script x-ui passes the no check certificate option to wget when downloading updates

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mhsanaein/a
Product-3x-uin/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-26493
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Drupal.org
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Drupal.org
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.08% / 24.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2022 | 16:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 05:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
miniOrange SAML Authentication Bypass

Xecurify's miniOrange Premium, Standard, and Enterprise Drupal SAML SP modules possess an authentication and authorization bypass vulnerability. An attacker with access to a HTTP-request intercepting method is able to bypass authentication and authorization by removing the SAML Assertion Signature - impersonating existing users and existing roles, including administrative users/roles. This vulnerability is not mitigated by configuring the module to enforce signatures or certificate checks. Xecurify recommends updating miniOrange modules to their most recent versions. This vulnerability is present in paid versions of the miniOrange Drupal SAML SP product affecting Drupal 7, 8, and 9.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-XecuifyThe Drupal Association
Product-saml_sp_2.0_single_sign_onDrupal 8 miniOrange SAML SPDrupal 9 miniOrange SAML SPDrupal 7 miniOrange SAML SP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-8531
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.32% / 54.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Oct, 2020 | 20:57
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A validation issue existed in Trust Anchor Management. This issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in watchOS 5.2, macOS Mojave 10.14.4, Security Update 2019-002 High Sierra, Security Update 2019-002 Sierra, iOS 12.2. An untrusted radius server certificate may be trusted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Apple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xiphone_oswatchosmacOSiOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24715
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.20% / 42.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Aug, 2020 | 21:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Scalyr Agent before 2.1.10 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation because, in some circumstances, native Python code is used that lacks a comparison of the hostname to commonName and subjectAltName.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-scalyrn/a
Product-scalyr_agentn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24714
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.22% / 44.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Aug, 2020 | 21:52
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Scalyr Agent before 2.1.10 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation because, in some circumstances, the openssl binary is called without the -verify_hostname option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-scalyrn/a
Product-scalyr_agentn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-1952
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-1.65% / 81.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Apr, 2020 | 16:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 06:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was found in Apache IoTDB .9.0 to 0.9.1 and 0.8.0 to 0.8.2. When starting IoTDB, the JMX port 31999 is exposed with no certification.Then, clients could execute code remotely.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-iotdbIoTDB
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21654
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 18.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:35
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect configuration handling allows TLS session re-use without re-validation in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. Envoy's tls allows re-use when some cert validation settings have changed from their default configuration. The only workaround for this issue is to ensure that default tls settings are used. Users are advised to upgrade.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-22885
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.62% / 68.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2022 | 21:56
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 03:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Hutool v5.7.18's HttpRequest was discovered to ignore all TLS/SSL certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hutooln/a
Product-hutooln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-12637
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.22% / 44.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 May, 2020 | 16:23
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Zulip Desktop before 5.2.0 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation because all validation was inadvertently disabled during an attempt to recognize the ignoreCerts option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-zulipchatn/a
Product-zulip_desktopn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-43882
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-9||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.58% / 67.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2021 | 14:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-defender_for_iotMicrosoft Defender for IoT
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-37437
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 48.97%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-16 Aug, 2022 | 19:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 20:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Ingest Actions UI in Splunk Enterprise 9.0.0 disabled TLS certificate validation

When using Ingest Actions to configure a destination that resides on Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) in Splunk Web, TLS certificate validation is not correctly performed and tested for the destination. The vulnerability only affects connections between Splunk Enterprise and an Ingest Actions Destination through Splunk Web and only applies to environments that have configured TLS certificate validation. It does not apply to Destinations configured directly in the outputs.conf configuration file. The vulnerability affects Splunk Enterprise version 9.0.0 and does not affect versions below 9.0.0, including the 8.1.x and 8.2.x versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkSplunk Enterprise
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-35898
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.09% / 26.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 May, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-30 Jan, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenText BizManager before 16.6.0.1 does not perform proper validation during the change-password operation. This allows any authenticated user to change the password of any other user, including the Administrator account.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpen Text Corporation
Product-bizmanagern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2024-49369
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-17.66% / 94.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2024 | 16:44
Updated-13 Nov, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Icinga 2 has a TLS Certificate Validation Bypass for JSON-RPC and HTTP API Connections

Icinga is a monitoring system which checks the availability of network resources, notifies users of outages, and generates performance data for reporting. The TLS certificate validation in all Icinga 2 versions starting from 2.4.0 was flawed, allowing an attacker to impersonate both trusted cluster nodes as well as any API users that use TLS client certificates for authentication (ApiUser objects with the client_cn attribute set). This vulnerability has been fixed in v2.14.3, v2.13.10, v2.12.11, and v2.11.12.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Icingaicinga
Product-icinga2icinga_web_2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-33907
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-4.39% / 88.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2021 | 13:55
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Zoom Client for Meetings for Windows in all versions before 5.3.0 fails to properly validate the certificate information used to sign .msi files when performing an update of the client. This could lead to remote code execution in an elevated privileged context.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aZoom Communications, Inc.
Product-meetingsZoom Client for Meetings for Windows
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found