A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the GraphQL API in GitLab since version 13.12 and before versions 13.12.6 and 14.0.2 allowed an attacker to call mutations as the victim

An issue was identified in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 1.0 prior to 15.8.5, 15.9 prior to 15.9.4, and 15.10 prior to 15.10.1 where non-printable characters gets copied from clipboard, allowing unexpected commands to be executed on victim machine.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.6 before 15.9.6, all versions starting from 15.10 before 15.10.5, all versions starting from 15.11 before 15.11.1. File integrity may be compromised when source code or installation packages are pulled from a tag or from a release containing a ref to another commit.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions before 16.4.4, all versions starting from 16.5 before 16.5.4, all versions starting from 16.6 before 16.6.2. File integrity may be compromised when source code or installation packages are pulled from a specific tag.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.3 before 16.4.4, all versions starting from 16.5 before 16.5.4, all versions starting from 16.6 before 16.6.2. File integrity may be compromised when specific HTML encoding is used for file names leading for incorrect representation in the UI.

An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 8.2 prior to 17.1.6 starting from 17.2 prior to 17.2.4, and starting from 17.3 prior to 17.3.1, which allows an attacker to create a branch with the same name as a deleted tag.

An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 8.16 prior to 17.0.6, starting from 17.1 prior to 17.1.4, and starting from 17.2 prior to 17.2.2, which causes the web interface to fail to render the diff correctly when the path is encoded.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 15.3 before 15.11.10, all versions starting from 16.0 before 16.0.6, all versions starting from 16.1 before 16.1.1, which allows an attacker to merge arbitrary code into protected branches.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 7.7 before 17.8.7, 17.9 before 17.9.6, and 17.10 before 17.10.4. Under certain conditions, an attacker could potentially trick users into unintentionally authorizing sensitive actions on their behalf.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions before 17.0.6, 17.1 prior to 17.1.4, and 17.2 prior to 17.2.2. An issue was found that allows someone to abuse a discrepancy between the Web application display and the git command line interface to social engineer victims into cloning non-trusted code.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 10.2. Required CODEOWNERS approval could be bypassed by targeting a branch without the CODEOWNERS file. Affected versions are >=10.2, <13.3.9,>=13.4, <13.4.5,>=13.5, <13.5.2.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab EE affecting all versions starting from 14.2 before 15.9.6, all versions starting from 15.10 before 15.10.5, all versions starting from 15.11 before 15.11.1. Lack of verification on RelayState parameter allowed a maliciously crafted URL to obtain access tokens granted for 3rd party Group SAML SSO logins. This feature isn't enabled by default.

A Cross Site Request Forgery issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions before 15.6.7, all versions starting from 15.7 before 15.7.6, and all versions starting from 15.8 before 15.8.1. An attacker could take over a project if an Owner or Maintainer uploads a file to a malicious project.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 10.8.7, 11.0.x before 11.0.5, and 11.1.x before 11.1.2. CSRF can occur in the Test feature of the System Hooks component.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.1.7, 11.2.x before 11.2.4, and 11.3.x before 11.3.1. There is Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the Slack integration for issuing slash commands.

CSRF in runner administration page in all versions of GitLab CE/EE allows an attacker who's able to target GitLab instance administrators to pause/resume runners. Affected versions are >=13.5.0, <13.5.2,>=13.4.0, <13.4.5,<13.3.9.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 10.6 prior to 16.9.7, starting from 16.10 prior to 16.10.5, and starting from 16.11 prior to 16.11.2 in which cross-site request forgery may have been possible on GitLab instances configured to use JWT as an OmniAuth provider.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all previous versions. If the victim is an admin, it was possible to issue a CSRF in System hooks through the API.

A CSRF vulnerability exists within GitLab CE/EE from versions 13.11 before 16.10.6, from 16.11 before 16.11.3, from 17.0 before 17.0.1. By leveraging this vulnerability, an attacker could exfiltrate anti-CSRF tokens via the Kubernetes Agent Server (KAS).

Missing sanitization of HTML attributes in Jupyter notebooks in all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 14.5 allows an attacker to perform arbitrary HTTP POST requests on a user's behalf leading to potential account takeover

An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 7.7 before 14.4.5, all versions starting from 14.5.0 before 14.5.3, all versions starting from 14.6.0 before 14.6.2. GitLab was vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack that allows a malicious user to have their GitHub project imported on another GitLab user account.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.6.10, 11.7.x before 11.7.6, and 11.8.x before 11.8.1. It allows CSRF.

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.1.0 before 16.11.5, all versions starting from 17.0 before 17.0.3, all versions starting from 17.1.0 before 17.1.1 which allowed for a CSRF attack on GitLab's GraphQL API leading to the execution of arbitrary GraphQL mutations.

FUEL CMS 1.5.0 login.php contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Keycloak Authentication Plugin 2.3.0 and earlier allows attackers to trick users into logging in to the attacker's account.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in tiggersWelt.Net Worthy plugin <= 1.6.5-6497609 versions.

The `PaperCutNG Mobility Print` version 1.0.3512 application allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform a CSRF attack on an instance administrator to configure the clients host (in the "configure printer discovery" section). This is possible because the application has no protections against CSRF attacks, like Anti-CSRF tokens, header origin validation, samesite cookies, etc.

The CRM and Lead Management by vcita plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.6.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the vcita-callback.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Event Registration Calendar By vcita plugin, versions up to and including 3.9.1, and Online Payments – Get Paid with PayPal, Square & Stripe plugin, for WordPress are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ls_parse_vcita_callback() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Clockwork Web before 0.1.2, when Rails before 5.2 is used, allows CSRF.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Gerrit Trigger Plugin 2.38.0 and earlier allows attackers to rebuild previous builds triggered by Gerrit.

Combodo iTop is an open source, web based IT Service Management tool. Prior to version 2.7.4, the CSRF token validation can be bypassed through iTop portal via a tricky browser procedure. The vulnerability is patched in version 2.7.4 and 3.0.0.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Bitbucket OAuth Plugin 0.12 and earlier allows attackers to trick users into logging in to the attacker's account.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository builderio/qwik prior to 0.104.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in a3rev Software Contact Us Page – Contact People plugin <= 3.7.0.

The Gravity Forms Google Sheet Connector WordPress plugin before 1.3.5, gsheetconnector-gravityforms-pro WordPress plugin through 1.3.5 does not have CSRF check when updating its Access Code, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin change the access code to an arbitrary one via a CSRF attack

Tiki through 25.0 allows CSRF attacks that are related to tiki-importer.php and tiki-import_sheet.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Muneeb Layer Slider plugin <= 1.1.9.7 versions.

The QuickEdit module does not properly validate access to routes, which could allow cross-site request forgery under some circumstances and lead to possible data integrity issues. Sites are only affected if the QuickEdit module (which comes with the Standard profile) is installed. Removing the "access in-place editing" permission from untrusted users will not fully mitigate the vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aarvanshinfotech Online Exam Software: eExamhall plugin <= 4.0 versions.

NETGEAR JNR1010 devices before 1.0.0.32 allow cgi-bin/webproc CSRF via the :InternetGatewayDevice.X_TWSZ-COM_URL_Filter.BlackList.1.URL parameter.

The WooCommerce Order Status Change Notifier WordPress plugin through 1.1.0 does not have authorisation and CSRF when updating status orders via an AJAX action available to any authenticated users, which could allow low privilege users such as subscriber to update arbitrary order status, making them paid without actually paying for them for example

php/qmn_options_questions_tab.php in the quiz-master-next plugin before 4.7.9 for WordPress allows CSRF, with resultant stored XSS, via the question_name parameter because js/admin_question.js mishandles parsing inside of a SCRIPT element.

The icegram plugin before 1.9.19 for WordPress has CSRF via the wp-admin/edit.php option_name parameter.

The WPCode WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 has a flawed CSRF when deleting log, and does not ensure that the file to be deleted is inside the expected folder. This could allow attackers to make users with the wpcode_activate_snippets capability delete arbitrary log files on the server, including outside of the blog folders

The Redirection WordPress plugin before 1.1.5 does not have CSRF checks in the uninstall action, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete all the redirections through a CSRF attack.

The beauty-premium theme 1.0.8 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant arbitrary file upload in includes/sendmail.php.

The Redirection WordPress plugin before 1.1.4 does not add nonce verification in place when adding the redirect, which could allow attackers to add redirects via a CSRF attack.

The Enable/Disable Auto Login when Register WordPress plugin through 1.1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository wallabag/wallabag prior to 2.5.4.