Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes WP Plugin Manager wp-plugin-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Plugin Manager: from n/a through <= 1.4.7.

A vulnerability was found in CodeAstro Expense Management System 1.0. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely.

A security vulnerability has been detected in osTicket up to 1.18.3. Impacted is an unknown function of the file include/class.dispatcher.php of the component Dispatcher. The manipulation of the argument _method leads to cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through a pull request but has not reacted yet.

The Notify Odoo plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the _updateSettings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the Notify Odoo URL to an attacker-controlled URL and modify notification, tracking image, and allowed IP address settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in colabrio Stockie Extra stockie-extra allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Stockie Extra: from n/a through <= 1.2.11.

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Gym Management System 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in freshchat Freshchat freshchat allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Freshchat: from n/a through <= 2.3.4.

SeedDMS 5.1.x is affected by cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in out.EditFolder.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PressTigers Simple Folio simple-folio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Folio: from n/a through <= 1.1.0.

The ViaAds plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `ViaAds_pluginHandler` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's API key and cookie consent settings via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Premmerce Premmerce premmerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Premmerce: from n/a through <= 1.3.19.

The Frontend User Notes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the funp_ajax_modify_notes function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in user into visiting a malicious page, causing unauthorized overwriting of that victim's own note content via a forged cross-site request to wp_update_post() via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Due to ownership enforcement comparing the note's stored _funp_single_user_id meta against the current session's user ID, the attack is limited to modifying only notes belonging to the tricked victim, and cannot be used to alter notes owned by arbitrary third-party users.

The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the change_status function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the status of arbitrary invoices — including marking unpaid invoices as paid — without administrator consent via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in hogash KALLYAS kallyas allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects KALLYAS: from n/a through < 4.25.0.

The Hide Categories Or Products On Shop Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_data_hcps() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The EmergencyWP – Dead Man's switch & legacy deliverance plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the form_settings_ui (settings save handler, procedural include scope) function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings including the minimum access role (altering WordPress role capabilities via add_cap/remove_cap), the data-erasure-on-uninstall flag, life-check timing values, the mandator email address, the confirmation page ID, and date/time formats via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Themis Plugin 1.4.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server.

The MetaMagic SEO Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metamagic_update_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's SEO settings, including enabling or disabling the plugin and toggling description and keyword meta tag output via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Flashyapp WP Flashy Marketing Automation wp-flashy-marketing-automation allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Flashy Marketing Automation: from n/a through <= 2.0.8.

The auto making JSON-LD plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amJL_certification function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's license key option, and subsequently trigger license validation and pro feature installation on the victim site without the administrator's consent via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation can trigger downstream calls to amJL_is_license_valid() and amJL_download_and_install_pro_features(), meaning the impact extends beyond a simple settings change to unauthorized installation of plugin components.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Prokopenko / JustCoded Just TinyMCE Custom Styles just-tinymce-styles allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Just TinyMCE Custom Styles: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JK Social Photo Fetcher facebook-photo-fetcher allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Social Photo Fetcher: from n/a through <= 3.0.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jory Hogeveen Off-Canvas Sidebars & Menus (Slidebars) off-canvas-sidebars allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Off-Canvas Sidebars & Menus (Slidebars): from n/a through <= 0.5.8.5.

The Far Future Expiry Header WordPress plugin before 1.5 does not have CSRF check when saving its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Serhii Pasyuk Gmedia Photo Gallery grand-media allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Gmedia Photo Gallery: from n/a through <= 1.25.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raychat Raychat raychat allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Raychat: from n/a through <= 2.2.1.

Lack of CSRF checks in the ActiveCampaign WordPress plugin, versions before 8.0.2, on its Settings form, which could allow attacker to make a logged-in administrator change API Credentials to attacker's account.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kunal Custom 404 Pro custom-404-pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom 404 Pro: from n/a through <= 3.12.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wasiliy Strecker / ContestGallery developer Contest Gallery contest-gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Contest Gallery: from n/a through <= 28.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP OnlineSupport, Essential Plugin Popup Anything – A Marketing Popup and Lead Generation Conversions plugin <= 2.2.1 versions.

The Language Bar Flags WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any CSRF in place when saving its settings and did not sanitise or escape them when generating the flag bar in the frontend. This could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings, and set Cross-Site Scripting payload in them, which will be executed in the frontend for all users

The Orange Form WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in all of its AJAX calls, for example the or_delete_filed one which is available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users could allow attackers to delete arbitrary posts.The AJAX calls performing actions on posts also do not ensure that the post belong to them (or that they are allowed to perform such action on it)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in M.Code Media Library Downloader media-library-downloader allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Media Library Downloader: from n/a through <= 1.4.0.

The Business Directory Plugin – Easy Listing Directories for WordPress WordPress plugin before 5.11.2 suffered from a Cross-Site Request Forgery issue, allowing an attacker to make a logged in administrator update arbitrary payment history, such as change their status (from pending to completed to example)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress WP Hotel Booking wp-hotel-booking allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Hotel Booking: from n/a through <= 2.2.8.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saad Iqbal Post Snippets post-snippets allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Post Snippets: from n/a through <= 4.0.11.

The Backup, Restore and Migrate your sites with XCloner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.8.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the Xcloner_Remote_Storage:save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add or modify an FTP backup configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to set an attacker-controlled FTP site for backup storage and exfiltrate potentially sensitive site data.

The MAZ Loader WordPress plugin before 1.4.1 does not enforce nonce checks, which allows attackers to make administrators delete arbitrary loaders via a CSRF attack

The Comment Link Remove and Other Comment Tools WordPress plugin before 2.1.6 does not have CSRF check in its 'Delete comments easily', which could allow attackers to make logged in admin delete arbitrary comments

The Timetable and Event Schedule WordPress plugin before 2.4.2 does not have proper access control when deleting a timeslot, allowing any user with the edit_posts capability (contributor+) to delete arbitrary timeslot from any events. Furthermore, no CSRF check is in place as well, allowing such attack to be performed via CSRF against a logged in with such capability

The WP Performance Score Booster WordPress plugin before 2.1 does not have CSRF check when saving its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

The VM Backups WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF checks, allowing attackers to make a logged in user unwanted actions, such as generate backups of the DB, plugins, and current .

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Clifton Griffin Simple Content Templates for Blog Posts & Pages simple-post-template allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Content Templates for Blog Posts & Pages: from n/a through <= 2.2.61.

The WP Limits WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in admin change them, which could make the blog unstable by setting low values

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Premmerce Premmerce Brands for WooCommerce premmerce-woocommerce-brands allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Premmerce Brands for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 1.2.13.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in photoboxone SMTP Mail smtp-mail allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects SMTP Mail: from n/a through <= 1.3.51.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in code-projects School Fees Payment System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The URL Shortify WordPress plugin before 1.5.1 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk-deleting links or groups, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary link and group via a CSRF attack.

The Shantz WordPress QOTD WordPress plugin through 1.2.2 is lacking any CSRF check when updating its settings, allowing attackers to make logged in administrators change them to arbitrary values.

The WP Survey Plus WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks in place in its AJAX actions, allowing any user to call them and add/edit/delete Surveys. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitization in the Surveys' Title, this could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues