A flaw was found in Moodle in versions 3.11 to 3.11.4, 3.10 to 3.10.8, 3.9 to 3.9.11 and earlier unsupported versions. The "delete badge alignment" functionality did not include the necessary token check to prevent a CSRF risk.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in StoreApps Stock Manager for WooCommerce plugin <= 2.10.0 versions.

STVS ProVision 5.9.10 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting unvalidated HTTP requests. Attackers can visit malicious web sites to trigger the forge request, allowing them to create new admin users.

Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR Camera contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to add a new admin user with full system privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.

The ContentLock WordPress plugin through 1.0.3 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting groups or emails, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin remove them via a CSRF attack

phoronix-test-suite is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

phoronix-test-suite is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The ContentLock WordPress plugin through 1.0.3 does not have CSRF check in place when adding emails, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Layout module's SEO configuration in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.70 through 7.4.3.76, and Liferay DXP 7.4 update 70 through 76 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code in the scripting console via the `_com_liferay_layout_admin_web_portlet_GroupPagesPortlet_backURL` parameter.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Quiz And Survey Master versions prior to 7.3.7 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators and conduct arbitrary operations via a specially crafted web page.

The PZ Frontend Manager WordPress plugin before 1.0.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

In parisneo/lollms-webui version v9.8, the lollms_binding_infos is missing the client_id parameter, which leads to multiple security vulnerabilities. Specifically, the endpoints /reload_binding, /install_binding, /reinstall_binding, /unInstall_binding, /set_active_binding_settings, and /update_binding_settings are susceptible to CSRF attacks and local attacks. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized actions on the victim's machine.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Raven WP Report Post plugin <= 2.1.2 versions.

The Sermon Browser WordPress plugin through 0.45.22 does not have CSRF checks in place when uploading Sermon files, and does not validate them in any way, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin upload arbitrary files such as PHP ones.

Missing sanitization of HTML attributes in Jupyter notebooks in all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 14.5 allows an attacker to perform arbitrary HTTP POST requests on a user's behalf leading to potential account takeover

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Inventory Manager plugin <= 2.1.0.13 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Really Simple Plugins Complianz, Really Simple Plugins Complianz Premium allows Cross-Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Complianz: from n/a through 6.4.5; Complianz Premium: from n/a through 6.4.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kebo Kebo Twitter Feed plugin <= 1.5.12 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pascal Casier bbPress Toolkit plugin <= 1.0.12 versions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token bypass was identified in PRTG 23.2.84.1566 and earlier versions that allows remote attackers to perform actions with the permissions of a victim user, provided the victim user has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request. This could force PRTG to execute different actions, such as creating new users. The severity of this vulnerability is high and received a score of 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Didier Sampaolo SpamReferrerBlock plugin <= 2.22 versions.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the target user.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPClever WPC Smart Wishlist for WooCommerce plugin <= 4.7.1 versions.

PiiGAB M-Bus is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery. An attacker who wants to execute a certain command could send a phishing mail to the owner of the device and hope that the owner clicks on the link. If the owner of the device has a cookie stored that allows the owner to be logged in, then the device could execute the GET or POST link request.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kenth Hagström WP-Cache.Com plugin <= 1.1.1 versions.

An issue in the Login page of Magnolia CMS v6.2.3 and below allows attackers to exploit both an Open Redirect vulnerability and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in order to brute force and exfiltrate users' credentials.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Gitea before 1.5.2 via API routes.This can be dangerous especially with state altering POST requests.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PI Websolution Conditional shipping & Advanced Flat rate shipping rates / Flexible shipping for WooCommerce shipping plugin <= 1.6.4.4 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Peter Shaw LH Password Changer plugin <= 1.55 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in myCred plugin <= 2.5 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Really Simple Plugins Recipe Maker For Your Food Blog from Zip Recipes plugin <= 8.0.7 versions.

An issue was discovered in PONTON X/P Messenger before 3.11.2. Anti-CSRF tokens are globally valid, making the web application vulnerable to a weakened version of CSRF, where an arbitrary token of a low-privileged user (such as operator) can be used to confirm actions of higher-privileged ones (such as xpadmin).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpexperts.Io WP PDF Generator plugin <= 1.2.2 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Malinky Ajax Pagination and Infinite Scroll plugin <= 2.0.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Local File Inclusion (LF) in Webpushr Web Push Notifications Web Push Notifications – Webpushr plugin <= 4.34.0 versions.

The wp-cart-for-digital-products WordPress plugin before 8.5.5 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

An issue was discovered in MediaWiki before 1.35.5, 1.36.x before 1.36.3, and 1.37.x before 1.37.1. MassEditRegex allows CSRF.

An issue was discovered in xiaohuanxiong CMS 5.0.17. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can that can add the administrator account.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in scriptburn.Com WP Hide Post plugin <= 2.0.10 versions.

An issue was discovered in Firmware Analysis and Comparison Tool v3.2. Logged in administrators could be targeted by a CSRF attack through visiting a crafted web page.

Xenforo before 2.2.16 allows CSRF.

IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 9.1 and 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Amarjeet Amar allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects gap-hub-user-role: from n/a through 3.4.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in George Holmes II Wayne Audio Player allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Wayne Audio Player: from n/a through 1.0.

REDCap through 14.9.6 has a security flaw in the Project Dashboards name, exposing users to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by luring users into clicking on a Project Dashboards name that contains the malicious payload, which triggers a logout request and terminates their session. This vulnerability stems from the absence of CSRF protections on the logout functionality, allowing malicious actions to be executed without user consent.

REDCap through 14.9.6 has a security flaw in the Notes section of calendar events, exposing users to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by luring users into accessing a calendar event's notes, which triggers a logout request and terminates their session. This vulnerability stems from the absence of CSRF protections on the logout functionality, allowing malicious actions to be executed without user consent.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Amiro.CMS before 7.8.4 allows remote attackers to create an administrator account.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in the firewall ePO extension of McAfee Endpoint Security (ENS) prior to 10.7.0 November 2020 Update allows an attacker to execute arbitrary HTML code due to incorrect security configuration.

The Process Steps Template Designer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to conduct unspecified attacks via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Crisp Live Chat WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation via the crisp_plugin_settings_page function found in the ~/crisp.php file, which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 0.31.