Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OG Tags versions prior to 2.0.2 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators and unintended operation may be performed via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tusko Trush Advanced Custom Fields : CPT Options Pages acf-cpt-options-pages allows Object Injection.This issue affects Advanced Custom Fields : CPT Options Pages: from n/a through <= 2.0.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ProteusThemes Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes custom-sidebars-by-proteusthemes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes: from n/a through <= 1.0.3.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Optical BB unit E-WMTA2.3 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted page.

Jenkins Bitbucket Server Integration Plugin 2.1.0 through 4.1.3 (both inclusive) allows attackers to craft URLs that would bypass the CSRF protection of any target URL in Jenkins.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Amiro.CMS before 7.8.4 allows remote attackers to create an administrator account.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Geovision GV-ASWeb application with the version 6.1.1.0 or less that allows attackers to arbitrarily create Administrator accounts via a crafted GET request method. This vulnerability is used in chain with CVE-2024-56903 for a successful CSRF attack.

REDCap through 14.9.6 has a security flaw in the Project Dashboards name, exposing users to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. An attacker can exploit this by luring users into clicking on a Project Dashboards name that contains the malicious payload, which triggers a logout request and terminates their session. This vulnerability stems from the absence of CSRF protections on the logout functionality, allowing malicious actions to be executed without user consent.

IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 9.1 and 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Bagisto before v.1.5.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML script.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Event Espresso Event Espresso 4 Decaf allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Event Espresso 4 Decaf: from n/a through 5.0.28.decaf.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in instapagedev Instapage Plugin allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Instapage Plugin: from n/a through 3.5.12.

07FLYCMS V1.3.9 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /erp.07fly.net:80/oa/OaWorkReport/edit.html

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Searchiq SearchIQ.This issue affects SearchIQ: from n/a through 4.6.

Emlog is an open source website building system. Emlog Pro versions 2.5.19 and earlier are vulnerable to Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on the password change endpoint. An attacker can trick a logged‑in administrator into submitting a crafted POST request to change the admin password without consent. Impact is account takeover of privileged users. Severity: High. As of time of publication, no known patched versions exist.

07FLYCMS V1.3.9 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /erp.07fly.net:80/oa/OaTask/edit.html.

IBM Security Verify Information Queue 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shahjada Download Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Download Manager: from n/a through 3.3.24.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in activewebsight SEO Backlink Monitor allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects SEO Backlink Monitor: from n/a through 1.6.0.

Racom's MIDGE Firmware 4.4.40.105 contains an issue that allows for cross-site request forgeries.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Neuralabz LTD. AutoWP allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AutoWP: from n/a through 2.0.8.

phoronix-test-suite is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The Yougler Blogger Profile Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, v1.01. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yougler-plugin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in grooni Groovy Menu allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Groovy Menu: from n/a through 1.4.3.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in HadSky 7.11.8. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component User Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-233372.

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in yonifre Lenix scss compiler allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Lenix scss compiler: from n/a through 1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael DUMONTET eewee admin custom allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects eewee admin custom: from n/a through 1.8.2.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AIpost AIcomments allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AIcomments: from n/a through 1.4.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository salesagility/suitecrm-core prior to 8.3.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in KCT AIKCT Engine Chatbot, ChatGPT, Gemini, GPT-4o Best AI Chatbot allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AIKCT Engine Chatbot, ChatGPT, Gemini, GPT-4o Best AI Chatbot: from n/a through 1.6.2.

Draytek VigorConnect 1.6.0-B3 lacks cross-site request forgery protections and does not sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

Machform prior to version 16 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery due to a lack of CSRF tokens in place.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository crater-invoice/crater prior to 6.0.4.

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.6 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in theDotstore Banner Management For WooCommerce plugin <= 2.4.2 versions.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in SourceCodester Simple Online Bidding System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function save_product of the file /admin/index.php?page=manage_product of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-266383.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Badi Jones Duplicate Content Cure duplicate-content-cure allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Duplicate Content Cure: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sabri Taieb Sogrid allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Sogrid: from n/a through 1.5.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Appointify allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Appointify: from n/a through 1.0.8.

The Coming soon and Maintenance mode WordPress plugin before 3.6.8 does not have CSRF check in its coming_soon_send_mail AJAX action, allowing attackers to make logged in admin to send arbitrary emails to all subscribed users via a CSRF attack

TYPO3 is a free and open source Content Management Framework. A vulnerability has been identified in the backend user interface functionality involving deep links. Specifically, this functionality is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Additionally, state-changing actions in downstream components incorrectly accepted submissions via HTTP GET and did not enforce the appropriate HTTP method. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires the victim to have an active session on the backend user interface and to be deceived into interacting with a malicious URL targeting the backend, which can occur under the following conditions: The user opens a malicious link, such as one sent via email. The user visits a compromised or manipulated website while the following settings are misconfigured: 1. `security.backend.enforceReferrer` feature is disabled, 2. `BE/cookieSameSite` configuration is set to lax or none. The vulnerability in the affected downstream component “Extension Manager Module” allows attackers to retrieve and install 3rd party extensions from the TYPO3 Extension Repository - which can lead to remote code execution in the worst case. Users are advised to update to TYPO3 versions 11.5.42 ELTS, 12.4.25 LTS, 13.4.3 LTS which fix the problem described.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in loopus WP Attractive Donations System - Easy Stripe & Paypal donations WP_AttractiveDonationsSystem allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Attractive Donations System - Easy Stripe & Paypal donations: from n/a through <= 1.25.

The Digital Marketing and Agency Templates Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the import_templates() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger an import via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Waituk Entrada theme allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Entrada: from n/a through 5.7.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Helmut Wandl Advanced Settings allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Advanced Settings: from n/a through 3.1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in brandtoss WP Mailster allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Mailster: from n/a through 1.8.17.0.

A vulnerability was found in valtech IDP Test Client and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file python-flask/main.py. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The name of the patch is f1e7b3d431c8681ec46445557125890c14fa295f. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-217148.

The WP2HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The MicroPayments – Fans Paysite: Paid Creator Subscriptions, Digital Assets, Wallet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the adminOptions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.