The Easy Digital Downloads WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting payment history, and does not ensure that the post to be deleted is actually a payment history. As a result, attackers could make a logged in admin delete arbitrary post via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress WP Hotel Booking plugin <= 1.10.5 at WordPress.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress uListing plugin (versions <= 2.0.5) makes it possible for attackers to modify user roles.

firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the /op/op.LockDocument.php in SeedDMS v5.1.x<5.1.23 and v6.0.x <6.0.16 allows a remote attacker to lock any document without victim's knowledge, by enticing an authenticated user to visit an attacker's web page.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dnesscarkey Use Any Font allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Use Any Font: from n/a through 6.3.08.

The Latest Tabs plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings update handler in admin-page.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Event Tickets with Ticket Scanner WordPress plugin before 2.5.4 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

A vulnerability has been found in LinZhaoguan pb-cms 2.0 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Logout. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in zj1983 zz up to 2024-08. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the /op/op.Ajax.php in SeedDMS v5.1.x<5.1.23 and v6.0.x<6.0.16 allows a remote attacker to edit document name without victim's knowledge, by enticing an authenticated user to visit an attacker's web page.

WordPress plugin "Carousel Slider" provided by Sayful Islam contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability on Hero image selection feature. While logged in to the WordPress site with Carousel Slider plugin enabled, accessing a crafted page may cause a user to alter the contents of the WordPress site.

The Sosh Share Buttons plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'admin_page_content' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Tripetto plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.0.9. This is due to missing nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary results via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability in the application integration feature of Cisco Webex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to authorize an external application to integrate with and access a user's account without that user's express consent. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) tokens. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing a targeted user who is currently authenticated to Cisco Webex Software to follow a link designed to pass malicious input to the Cisco Webex Software application authorization interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause Cisco Webex Software to authorize an application on the user's behalf without the express consent of the user, possibly allowing external applications to read data from that user's profile.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in wpWax Legal Pages.This issue affects Legal Pages: from n/a through 1.3.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cozmoslabs Paid Member Subscriptions.This issue affects Paid Member Subscriptions: from n/a through 2.10.4.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Benner ModernaNet up to 1.2.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /DadosPessoais/SG_Gravar. The manipulation of the argument idItAg leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.2.1 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

The Page Builder: Pagelayer – Drag and Drop website builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the pagelayer_save_post function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify post contents via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saiful Islam Add to Cart Text Changer and Customize Button, Add Custom Icon.This issue affects Add to Cart Text Changer and Customize Button, Add Custom Icon: from n/a through 2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Leithold DSGVO All in one for WP.This issue affects DSGVO All in one for WP: from n/a through 4.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Palscode Multi Currency For WooCommerce.This issue affects Multi Currency For WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.5.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blue Coral Chat Bubble – Floating Chat with Contact Chat Icons, Messages, Telegram, Email, SMS, Call me back.This issue affects Chat Bubble – Floating Chat with Contact Chat Icons, Messages, Telegram, Email, SMS, Call me back: from n/a through 2.3.

Pajbot is a Twitch chat bot. Pajbot versions prior to 1.52 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). Hosters of the bot should upgrade to `v1.52` or `stable` to install the patch or, as a workaround, can add one modern dependency.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Integrate Google Drive.This issue affects Integrate Google Drive: from n/a through 1.3.4.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in DedeCMS 5.7. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /src/dede/friendlink_edit.php. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-257708. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Denis Kobozev CSV Importer.This issue affects CSV Importer: from n/a through 0.3.8.

The BEAR for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the woobe_bulkoperations_apply_default_combination function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to manipulate products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Delta Electronics DIAEnergie Version 1.7.5 and prior is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery, which may allow an attacker to cause a user to carry out an action unintentionally.

Missing Authorization, Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Roland Barker, xnau webdesign Participants Database allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs, Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Participants Database: from n/a through 2.5.5.

The BEAR for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the woobe_bulkoperations_delete function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PressTigers Simple Testimonials Showcase allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Testimonials Showcase: from n/a through 1.1.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Extend Themes Calliope.This issue affects Calliope: from n/a through 1.0.33.

Concrete CMS before 8.5.14 and 9 before 9.2.3 allows Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via ccm/calendar/dialogs/event/delete/submit. An attacker can force an admin to delete events on the site because the event ID is numeric and sequential.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alexufo Youtube SpeedLoad plugin <= 0.6.3 versions.

A vulnerability was found in Benner ModernaNet up to 1.1.0. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /DadosPessoais/SG_AlterarSenha. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 1.1.1 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was detected in PHPEMS up to 11.0. The impacted element is an unknown function. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the /op/op.UnlockDocument.php in SeedDMS v5.1.x <5.1.23 and v6.0.x <6.0.16 allows a remote attacker to unlock any document without victim's knowledge, by enticing an authenticated user to visit an attacker's web page.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in OFCMS 1.1.3. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The Wp Social Login and Register Social Counter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the counter_access_key_setup() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update social login provider settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Elementor Addon Elements plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.12.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the eae_save_config function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change configuration settings for the plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The LadiApp plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the publish_lp() function hooked via an AJAX action in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the LadiPage key (a key fully controlled by the attacker), enabling them to freely create new pages, including web pages that trigger stored XSS via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability was found in shishuocms 1.1 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The Upcoming for Calendly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's Calendly API key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The BMLT WordPress Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.11.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'BMLTPlugin_create_option' and 'BMLTPlugin_delete_option ' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Stop Spammers Classic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2026.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ss_addtoallowlist class. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add arbitrary email addresses to the spam allowlist via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The vulnerability was partially patched in version 2026.1.

The Coding Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings including the theme configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Animated Pixel Marquee Creator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the 'marquee' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the marquee deletion function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary marquees via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Buyanov WP Power Stats plugin <= 2.2.3 versions.

The Truefy Embed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'truefy_embed_options_update' settings update action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings, including the API key, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.