The Ultimate Tag Warrior Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to import tags granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick users into performing an action they didn't intend to perform under their current authentication. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.8.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

The Bricks theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'reset_settings' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the theme's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability has been found in mtons mblog up to 3.5.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_manage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add new todo items via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Bricks theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'save_settings' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the theme's settings, including enabling a setting which allows lower-privileged users such as contributors to perform code execution, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick users into performing an action they didn't intend to perform under their current authentication. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.8.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sender Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce.This issue affects Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.6.18.

The Subscribers Text Counter WordPress plugin before 1.7.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack, which also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping

The XV Random Quotes WordPress plugin through 1.40 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin reset them via a CSRF attack

The OceanWP theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 4.0.9 to 4.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the oceanwp_notice_button_click() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to install the Ocean Extra plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in John Brien WordPress NextGen GalleryView plugin <= 0.5.5 versions.

A vulnerability was found in atjiu pybbs up to 6.0.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function setCookie of the file src/main/java/co/yiiu/pybbs/util/CookieUtil.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is named 8aa2bb1aef3346e49aec6358edf5e47ce905ae7b. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeinProgress WIP Custom Login plugin <= 1.2.9 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Krzysztof Wielogórski Stop Referrer Spam plugin <= 1.3.0 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BRANDbrilliance Post State Tags plugin <= 2.0.6 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mark Tilly MyCurator Content Curation plugin <= 3.74 versions.

The Widgets for Google Reviews plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 10.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation within setup_no_reg_header.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset plugin settings and remove reviews via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Tag Profiler Plugin 0.2 and earlier allows attackers to reset profiler statistics.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Shared Objects Plugin 0.44 and earlier allows attackers to configure shared objects.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Email Extension Plugin allows attackers to make another user stop watching an attacker-specified job.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Metorik Metorik – Reports & Email Automation for WooCommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Metorik – Reports & Email Automation for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.7.1.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in jerryshensjf JPACookieShop 蛋糕商城JPA版 up to 24a15c02b4f75042c9f7f615a3fed2ec1cefb999. This affects an unknown part of the file AdminTypeCustController.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Freelancelot Oceanic allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Oceanic: from n/a through 1.0.48.

The MStore API plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation on the mstore_update_limit_product function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update limit the number of product per category to use cache data in home screen via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The POST SMTP Mailer WordPress plugin before 2.5.7 does not have proper CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in users with the manage_postman_smtp capability delete arbitrary logs via a CSRF attack.

A vulnerability has been identified in POWER METER SICAM Q100 (All versions < V2.60), POWER METER SICAM Q100 (All versions < V2.60), POWER METER SICAM Q100 (All versions < V2.60), POWER METER SICAM Q100 (All versions < V2.60). The web interface of the affected devices are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. By tricking an authenticated victim user to click a malicious link, an attacker could perform arbitrary actions on the device on behalf of the victim user.

The Easy restaurant menu manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the nsc_eprm_save_menu() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload a menu file via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ultimate Member plugin <= 2.6.0 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Magazine3 Google Adsense & Banner Ads by AdsforWP allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Google Adsense & Banner Ads by AdsforWP: from n/a through 1.9.28.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tradebooster Video XML Sitemap Generator.This issue affects Video XML Sitemap Generator: from n/a through 1.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Epsiloncool WP Fast Total Search.This issue affects WP Fast Total Search: from n/a through 1.69.234.

A vulnerability was found in SMI SMI-EX-5414W up to 1.0.03. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component Web Interface. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-260907.

The Themify Store Locator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the setting_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tagbox Taggbox allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Taggbox: from n/a through 3.3.

A vulnerability has been found in 495300897 wx-shop up to de1b66331368695779cfc6e4d11a64caddf8716e and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available.

A vulnerability was found in zhenfeng13 My-Blog up to 1.0.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/tags/save. The manipulation of the argument tagName leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2024.2.34646 the Guest User Account was enabled for attaching files to articles

A vulnerability has been found in Guangdong Pythagorean OA Office System up to 4.50.31 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /note/index/delete. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-230458 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VolThemes Patricia Blog allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Patricia Blog: from n/a through 1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Matomo Matomo Analytics allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Matomo Analytics: from n/a through 5.1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Whydonate Whydonate – FREE Donate button – Crowdfunding – Fundraising plugin <= 3.12.15 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in uPress Enable Accessibility plugin <= 1.4 versions.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in 1000 Projects Bookstore Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The Restore Permanently delete Post or Page Data plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the rp_dpo_dpa_ajax_dp_delete_data() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Labib Ahmed Animated Rotating Words allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Animated Rotating Words: from n/a through 5.6.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in CodeAstro Online Movie Ticket Booking System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The CBX Restaurant Booking WordPress plugin through 1.2.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in 07FLYCMS, 07FLY-CMS and 07FlyCRM up to 1.3.9. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is published under multiple names. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.