Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro OfficeScan XG SP1 and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a specific sweep.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a sweep.

An authenticated attacker can exploit an Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Health Bot to elevate privileges over a network.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Purview allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Adobe Campaign Classic Gold Standard 10 (and earlier), 20.3.1 (and earlier), 20.2.3 (and earlier), 20.1.3 (and earlier), 19.2.3 (and earlier) and 19.1.7 (and earlier) are affected by a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to use the Campaign instance to issue unauthorized requests to internal or external resources.

IBM Jazz Team Server 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1, 7.0, 7.0.1, and 7.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 198931.

IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, and 8.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197502.

IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197591.

This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the PaperCut NG/MF server-side module that allows an attacker to induce the server-side application to make HTTP requests to an arbitrary domain of the attacker's choosing.

IBM Content Navigator 3.0.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 259247.

Rollup 18 for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 SP3 and previous versions has an SSRF vulnerability via the username parameter in /owa/auth/logon.aspx in the OWA (Outlook Web Access) login page.

Microsoft ADFS 4.0 Windows Server 2016 and previous (Active Directory Federation Services) has an SSRF vulnerability via the txtBoxEmail parameter in /adfs/ls.

uniquesig0/InternalSite/InitParams.aspx in Microsoft Forefront Unified Access Gateway 2010 allows remote attackers to trigger outbound DNS queries for arbitrary hosts via a comma-separated list of URLs in the orig_url parameter, possibly causing a traffic amplification and/or SSRF outcome.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Salesforce Tableau Server on Windows, Linux (EPS Server modules) allows Resource Location Spoofing. This issue affects Tableau Server: before 2025.1.3, before 2024.2.12, before 2023.3.19.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Salesforce Tableau Server on Windows, Linux (Amazon S3 Connector modules) allows Resource Location Spoofing. This issue affects Tableau Server: before 2025.1.3, before 2024.2.12, before 2023.3.19.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Microsoft Power Apps allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network

A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modOSCE component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations.

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure Storage Resource Provider allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

IBM Jazz Team Server 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1, 7.0, 7.0.1, and 7.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, an attacker who can influence the target URL of an Axios request can use any address in the 127.0.0.0/8 range (other than 127.0.0.1) to completely bypass the NO_PROXY protection. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete for CVE-2025-62718, This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1.

FastGPT is an AI Agent building platform. Prior to version 4.14.9.5, the FastGPT HTTP tools testing endpoint (/api/core/app/httpTools/runTool) is exposed without any authentication. This endpoint acts as a full HTTP proxy — it accepts a user-supplied baseUrl, toolPath, HTTP method, custom headers, and body, then makes a server-side HTTP request and returns the complete response to the caller. This issue has been patched in version 4.14.9.5.

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.128, the /api/v1/runs endpoint accepts an arbitrary webhook_url in the request body with no URL validation. When a submitted job completes (success or failure), the server makes an HTTP POST request to this URL using httpx.AsyncClient. An unauthenticated attacker can use this to make the server send POST requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations, enabling SSRF against cloud metadata services, internal APIs, and other network-adjacent services. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.128.

A vulnerability in Trend Micro Control Manager (versions 6.0 and 7.0) could allow an attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on vulnerable installations.

openHAB, a provider of open-source home automation software, has add-ons including the visualization add-on CometVisu. Prior to version 4.2.1, the proxy endpoint of openHAB's CometVisu add-on can be accessed without authentication. This proxy-feature can be exploited as Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) to induce GET HTTP requests to internal-only servers, in case openHAB is exposed in a non-private network. Furthermore, this proxy-feature can also be exploited as a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, as an attacker is able to re-route a request to their server and return a page with malicious JavaScript code. Since the browser receives this data directly from the openHAB CometVisu UI, this JavaScript code will be executed with the origin of the CometVisu UI. This allows an attacker to exploit call endpoints on an openHAB server even if the openHAB server is located in a private network. (e.g. by sending an openHAB admin a link that proxies malicious JavaScript.) This issue may lead up to Remote Code Execution (RCE) when chained with other vulnerabilities. Users should upgrade to version 4.2.1 of the CometVisu add-on of openHAB to receive a patch.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository plantuml/plantuml prior to 1.2023.9.

A blind SSRF vulnerability exists in the Visualizer plugin before 3.3.1 for WordPress via wp-json/visualizer/v1/upload-data.

HedgeDoc (formerly known as CodiMD) is an open-source collaborative markdown editor. An attacker is able to receive arbitrary files from the file system when exporting a note to PDF. Since the code injection has to take place as note content, there fore this exploit requires the attackers ability to modify a note. This will affect all instances, which have pdf export enabled. This issue has been fixed by https://github.com/hedgedoc/hedgedoc/commit/c1789474020a6d668d616464cb2da5e90e123f65 and is available in version 1.5.0. Starting the CodiMD/HedgeDoc instance with `CMD_ALLOW_PDF_EXPORT=false` or set `"allowPDFExport": false` in config.json can mitigate this issue for those who cannot upgrade. This exploit works because while PhantomJS doesn't actually render the `file:///` references to the PDF file itself, it still uses them internally, and exfiltration is possible, and easy through JavaScript rendering. The impact is pretty bad, as the attacker is able to read the CodiMD/HedgeDoc `config.json` file as well any other files on the filesystem. Even though the suggested Docker deploy option doesn't have many interesting files itself, the `config.json` still often contains sensitive information, database credentials, and maybe OAuth secrets among other things.