Mattermost fails to properly check a redirect URL parameter allowing for an open redirect was possible when the user clicked "Back to Mattermost" after providing a invalid custom url scheme in /oauth/{service}/mobile_login?redirect_to=

Mattermost fails to restrict which parameters' values it takes from the request during signup allowing an attacker to register users as inactive, thus blocking them from later accessing Mattermost without the system admin activating their accounts.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 4.3.0, 4.2.1, and 4.1.2. It allows an attacker to create a button that, when pressed by a user, launches an API request.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 4.0.0, 3.10.2, and 3.9.2. CSRF can occur if CORS is enabled.

Mattermost fails to validate if a relative path is passed in /plugins/playbooks/api/v0/telemetry/run/<telem_run_id> as a telemetry run ID, allowing an attacker to use a path traversal payload that points to a different endpoint leading to a CSRF attack.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 2.1.0. It allows XSS via CSRF.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.18.0, 5.17.2, 5.16.4, 5.15.4, and 5.9.7. CSRF can sometimes occur via a crafted web site for account takeover attacks.

Mattermost versions 9.10.x <= 9.10.2, 9.11.x <= 9.11.1, 9.5.x <= 9.5.9 fail to sanitize user inputs in the frontend that are used for redirection which allows for a one-click client-side path traversal that is leading to CSRF in Playbooks

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.12.0, 5.11.1, 5.10.2, 5.9.2, and 4.10.10. The login page allows CSRF.

Mattermost Mobile Apps versions <=2.32.0 fail to verify that SSO redirect tokens originate from the trusted server, which allows a malicious Mattermost instance or on-path attacker to obtain user session credentials via crafted token-in-URL responses

Mattermost versions 9.9.x <= 9.9.1, 9.5.x <= 9.5.7, 9.10.x <= 9.10.0, 9.8.x <= 9.8.2 fail to sanitize user inputs in the frontend that are used for redirection which allows for a one-click client-side path traversal that is leading to CSRF in User Management page of the system console.

Mattermost versions 9.5.x <= 9.5.3, 9.6.x <= 9.6.1 and 8.1.x <= 8.1.12 fail to perform proper input validation on post actions which allows an attacker to run a playbook checklist task command as another user via creating and sharing a deceptive post action that unexpectedly runs a slash command in some arbitrary channel.

Mattermost Jira Plugin fails to protect against logout CSRF allowing an attacker to post a specially crafted message that would disconnect a user's Jira connection in Mattermost only by viewing the message.

The wpDiscuz WordPress plugin before 7.3.4 does check for CSRF when adding, editing and deleting comments, which could allow attacker to make logged in users such as admin edit and delete arbitrary comment, or the user who made the comment to edit it via a CSRF attack. Attackers could also make logged in users post arbitrary comment.

The WP All Import Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.7. This is due to missing nonce validation on the delete_and_edit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete imported content (posts, comments, users, etc.) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The ImagePress – Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'imagepress_admin_page' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings, including redirection URLs, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Automattic WooCommerce.This issue affects WooCommerce: from n/a through 8.2.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Copyscape Copyscape Premium copyscape-premium allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Copyscape Premium: from n/a through <= 1.4.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in magepeopleteam WpEvently mage-eventpress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WpEvently: from n/a through <= 5.1.1.

The Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.35.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the quiz 'create_module' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create draft quizzes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Shenzhen Tenda W30E V2 firmware versions up to and including V16.01.0.19(5037) lack cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections on administrative endpoints, including those used to change administrator account credentials. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious requests that, when triggered by an authenticated user’s browser, modify administrative passwords and other configuration settings.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wp.Insider, wpaffiliatemgr Affiliates Manager.This issue affects Affiliates Manager: from n/a through 2.9.31.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paolo GeoDirectory allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects GeoDirectory: from n/a before 2.8.150.

The Tourfic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.20. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the tf_order_status_email_resend_function, tf_visitor_details_edit_function, tf_checkinout_details_edit_function, tf_order_status_edit_function, tf_order_bulk_action_edit_function, tf_remove_room_order_ids, and tf_delete_old_review_fields functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to resend order status emails, update visitor/order details, edit check-in/out details, edit order status, perform bulk order status updates, remove room order IDs, and delete old review fields, respectively, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Field Test gem 0.2.0 through 0.3.2 for Ruby allows CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SureTriggers SureTriggers – Connect All Your Plugins, Apps, Tools & Automate Everything!.This issue affects SureTriggers – Connect All Your Plugins, Apps, Tools & Automate Everything!: from n/a through 1.0.23.

The Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Brevo (formely Sendinblue) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.87. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the Init() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log out of a Brevo connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Per page add to head WordPress plugin before 1.4.4 is lacking any CSRF check when saving its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them. Furthermore, as the plugin allows arbitrary HTML to be inserted in one of the setting (feature mentioned by the plugin), this could lead to Stored XSS issue which will be triggered either in the backend, frontend or both depending on the payload used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Yevhen Kotelnytskyi JS & CSS Script Optimizer.This issue affects JS & CSS Script Optimizer: from n/a through 0.3.3.

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Car Driving School Management System 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function save_users of the file admin/user/index.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themelooks Enter Addons enteraddons allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Enter Addons: from n/a through <= 2.3.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in GS Plugins Logo Slider – Logo Showcase, Logo Carousel, Logo Gallery and Client Logo Presentation.This issue affects Logo Slider – Logo Showcase, Logo Carousel, Logo Gallery and Client Logo Presentation: from n/a through 3.5.1.

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Insurance Management System 1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Sigmize sigmize allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Sigmize: from n/a through <= 0.0.9.

The Simple Nav Archives WordPress plugin through 2.1.3 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Timur Kamaev Kama Thumbnail kama-thumbnail allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Kama Thumbnail: from n/a through <= 3.5.1.

The adstxt Plugin WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

A vulnerability was found in OSWAPP Warehouse Inventory System 1.0/2.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file /edit_account.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-273552.

The blogintroduction-wordpress-plugin WordPress plugin through 0.3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stiofan UsersWP userswp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects UsersWP: from n/a through <= 1.2.53.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in John James Jacoby WP Term Order wp-term-order allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Term Order: from n/a through <= 2.1.0.

The Premium Packages – Sell Digital Products Securely plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.9.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the addRefund() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform actions such as initiating refunds via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or shop manager into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Car Driving School Management System 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function save_package of the file admin/packages/manag_package.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The Reviews Feed – Add Testimonials and Customer Reviews From Google Reviews, Yelp, TripAdvisor, and More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'update_api_key' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update an API key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Widgets Reset WordPress plugin through 0.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The ImageRecycle pdf & image compression plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.14. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions in the class/class-image-otimizer.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings along with performing other actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Gestsup v3.2.46 allows attackers to arbitrarily edit user profile information via a crafted request.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in СleanTalk - Anti-Spam Protection Spam protection, Anti-Spam, FireWall by CleanTalk.This issue affects Spam protection, Anti-Spam, FireWall by CleanTalk: from n/a through 6.20.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smash Balloon Custom Twitter Feeds – A Tweets Widget or X Feed Widget.This issue affects Custom Twitter Feeds – A Tweets Widget or X Feed Widget: from n/a through 2.1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Atlas Gondal Export Media URLs.This issue affects Export Media URLs: from n/a through 1.0.