A weakness has been identified in SourceCodester Note Taking App up to 1.0. This impacts an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to event deletion was discovered in Spiffy Calendar WordPress plugin (versions <= 4.9.0).
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in StylemixThemes eRoom – Zoom Meetings & Webinar (WordPress plugin) <= 1.3.8 allows cache deletion.
A security flaw has been discovered in Technostrobe HI-LED-WR120-G2 5.5.0.1R6.03.30. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in StylemixThemes eRoom – Zoom Meetings & Webinar (WordPress plugin) <= 1.3.7 allows an attacker to Sync with Zoom Meetings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to plugin Settings Update discovered in WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click WordPress plugin (versions <= 3.4.4).
The Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.10.23. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ecwid_update_plugin_params function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin options granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap has missing CSRF protections on artifact submission & edition from the tracker view. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into submitting or editing artifacts or follow-up comments. The vulnerability is fixed in Tuleap Community Edition 16.5.99.1741784483 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.5-3 and 16.4-8.
The Easy Digital Downloads WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting payment history, and does not ensure that the post to be deleted is actually a payment history. As a result, attackers could make a logged in admin delete arbitrary post via a CSRF attack
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jonathan Lau CubePoints cubepoints allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects CubePoints: from n/a through <= 3.2.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Muntasir Rahman Custom Dashboard Page custom-dashboard-page allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Dashboard Page: from n/a through <= 1.0.
The WP Edit Menu WordPress plugin before 1.5.0 does not have authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, which could allow unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts/pages from the blog
The WP Edit Menu WordPress plugin before 1.5.0 does not have CSRF in an AJAX action, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary posts/pages from the blog via a CSRF attack
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in A. Chappard Display Template Name display-template-name allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Display Template Name: from n/a through <= 1.7.1.
The WPUpper Share Buttons plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.51. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'save_custom_css_request' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject custom CSS to modify a site via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to unauthorized file deletion due to an Inverted CSRF token check in the DeleteFile controller. The code throws an error when the token IS valid and proceeds with file deletion when the token is invalid or missing. This effectively disables CSRF protection for the file deletion endpoint, allowing cross-site request forgery attacks against users who have permission to edit conversation messages. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with a vector of CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Tristan Mandani for reporting.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Publish Over SSH Plugin 1.22 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified SSH server using attacker-specified credentials.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Weblizar - WordPress Themes & Plugin HR Management Lite hr-management-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects HR Management Lite: from n/a through <= 3.6.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dmitry V. (CEO of "UKR Solution") Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager barcode-scanner-lite-pos-to-manage-products-inventory-and-orders allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager: from n/a through <= 1.11.0.
The WordPress Mega Menu – QuadMenu plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_dismiss_notice() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update any user meta to a value of one, including wp_capabilities which could result in a privilege deescalation of an administrator, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The WordPress plugin Gallery for Social Photo is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.0.0.27 due to failure to properly check for the existence of a nonce in the function gifeed_duplicate_feed. This make it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate existing posts or pages granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A vulnerability was found in Uniway UW-302VP 2.0. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /boaform/wlan_basic_set.cgi of the component Admin Web Interface. The manipulation of the argument wlanssid/password leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248939. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Prokopenko / JustCoded Just Variables just-wp-variables allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Just Variables: from n/a through <= 1.2.3.
The Ultimate Noindex Nofollow Tool WordPress plugin through 1.1.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
VMware Workspace ONE Access, Identity Manager and vRealize Automation contain a cross site request forgery vulnerability. A malicious actor can trick a user through a cross site request forgery to unintentionally validate a malicious JDBC URI.
The Ni WooCommerce Order Export plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 3.1.6. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ni_order_export_action() AJAX handler function. The handler processes settings updates when the 'page' parameter is set to 'nioe-order-settings', delegating to Ni_Order_Setting::page_ajax() which calls update_option('ni_order_export_option', $_REQUEST) without verifying any nonce or checking user capabilities. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.
The mCatFilter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.5.2. This is due to the complete absence of nonce verification and capability checks in the compute_post() function, which processes settings updates. The compute_post() function is called in the plugin constructor on every page load via the plugins_loaded hook, and it directly processes $_POST data to modify plugin settings via update_option() without any CSRF token validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify all plugin settings, including category exclusion rules, feed exclusion flags, and tag page exclusion flags, via a forged POST request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.
The Neos Connector for Fakturama plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.0.14. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ncff_add_plugin_page() function which handles settings updates. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.
The Quran Translations plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the quran_playlist_options() function that handles the plugin's settings page. The function processes POST requests to update plugin options via update_option() without any wp_nonce_field() in the form or wp_verify_nonce()/check_admin_referer() verification before processing. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings (toggling display options for PDF, RSS, podcast, media player links, playlist title, and playlist code) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Amazon Scraper plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The application is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery. An attacker can trick a valid, logged in user into submitting a web request that they did not intend. The request uses the victim's browser's saved authorization to execute the request.
The WordPress plugin Image Slider is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.1.121 due to failure to properly check for the existence of a nonce in the function ewic_duplicate_slider. This make it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate existing posts or pages granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Call To Action Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.3. This is due to missing nonce validation in the cbox_options_page() function which handles saving, creating, and deleting plugin settings. The form rendered on the settings page does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the save handler does not call wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() before processing settings updates via $wpdb->update(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings such as call-to-action box title, content, link URL, image URL, colors, and other configuration options via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The TextP2P Texting Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the imTextP2POptionPage() function which processes settings updates. The form at line 314 does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the POST handler at line 7 does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing settings changes. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update all plugin settings including chat widget titles, messages, API credentials, colors, and reCAPTCHA configuration via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.
The Kcaptcha plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the plugin's settings page handler (admin/setting.php). The settings form does not include a wp_nonce_field() and the form processing code does not call wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() before saving settings to the database via $wpdb->update(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's CAPTCHA settings (enabling or disabling CAPTCHA on login, registration, lost password, and comment forms) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.
The Petje.af plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 2.1.8. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ajax_revoke_token() function which handles the 'petjeaf_disconnect' AJAX action. The function performs destructive operations including revoking OAuth2 tokens, deleting user meta, and deleting WordPress user accounts (for users with the 'petjeaf_member' role) without verifying the request originated from a legitimate source. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force authenticated users to delete their Petje.af member user accounts via a forged request granted the victim clicks on a link or visits a malicious site.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RealMag777 InPost Gallery inpost-gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects InPost Gallery: from n/a through <= 2.1.4.3.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themearile NewsExo newsexo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects NewsExo: from n/a through <= 7.1.
A vulnerability was identified in calcom cal.diy up to 4.9.4. Impacted is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
The Add Custom Fields to Media plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the field deletion functionality in the admin display template. The plugin properly validates a nonce for the 'add field' operation (line 24-36), but the 'delete field' operation (lines 38-49) processes the $_GET['delete'] parameter and calls update_option() without any nonce verification. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary custom media fields via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A vulnerability was found in XYZScripts Contact Form Manager Plugin. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
The Alfie – Feed Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the alfie_manage() function which handles feed deletion via the 'delete' GET parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary plugin feed data (from alfie_colindex, alfie_producten, alfie_reactions, and alfie_searchproduct tables) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bob Namaste! LMS namaste-lms allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Namaste! LMS: from n/a through <= 2.6.5.
The LinkWorth WordPress plugin before 3.3.4 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change settings via a CSRF attack.
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 26.0 and prior, the site customization endpoint at admin/customize_settings_nativeUpdate.json.php lacks CSRF token validation and writes uploaded logo files to disk before the ORM's domain-based security check executes. Combined with SameSite=None cookie policy, a cross-origin POST can overwrite the platform's logo with attacker-controlled content.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seerox WP Media File Type Manager wp-media-file-type-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Media File Type Manager: from n/a through <= 2.3.1.
The ImageRecycle pdf & image compression plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the disableOptimization function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disable the image optimization setting via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Download Manager Plugin 2.8.99. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 26.0 and prior, the player skin configuration endpoint at admin/playerUpdate.json.php does not validate CSRF tokens. The plugins table is explicitly excluded from the ORM's domain-based security check via ignoreTableSecurityCheck(), removing the only other layer of defense. Combined with SameSite=None cookies, a cross-origin POST can modify the video player appearance on the entire platform.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Mailer Plugin 391.ve4a_38c1b_cf4b_ and earlier allows attackers to use the DNS used by the Jenkins instance to resolve an attacker-specified hostname.