The Redirection WordPress plugin before 1.1.5 does not have CSRF checks in the uninstall action, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete all the redirections through a CSRF attack.
The OAuth Single Sign On Free WordPress plugin before 6.24.2, OAuth Single Sign On Standard WordPress plugin before 28.4.9, OAuth Single Sign On Premium WordPress plugin before 38.4.9 and OAuth Single Sign On Enterprise WordPress plugin before 48.4.9 do not have CSRF checks when deleting Identity Providers (IdP), which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary IdP via a CSRF attack
SOPlanning 1.45 is vulnerable to a CSRF attack that allows for arbitrary user creation via process/xajax_server.php.
The WPCode WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 has a flawed CSRF when deleting log, and does not ensure that the file to be deleted is inside the expected folder. This could allow attackers to make users with the wpcode_activate_snippets capability delete arbitrary log files on the server, including outside of the blog folders
The Redirection WordPress plugin before 1.1.4 does not add nonce verification in place when adding the redirect, which could allow attackers to add redirects via a CSRF attack.
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in XXL-JOB 2.3.1. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /user/updatePwd of the component New Password Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-220196.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository wallabag/wallabag prior to 2.5.4.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository modoboa/modoboa prior to 2.0.4.
PHPgurukul Online Course Registration v3.1 lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection on all administrative forms. An attacker can perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated administrators by tricking them into visiting a malicious webpage.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository modoboa/modoboa prior to 2.0.4.
The JetWidgets for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.12. This is due to missing nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to to modify the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This can be used to enable SVG uploads that could make Cross-Site Scripting possible.
The Enable/Disable Auto Login when Register WordPress plugin through 1.1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack
SOPlanning 1.45 is vulnerable to a CSRF attack that allows for arbitrary changing of the admin password via process/xajax_server.php.
The WP News WordPress plugin through 1.1.9 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack
The WP Insurance WordPress plugin before 2.1.4 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack
wallabag version 2.5.2 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows attackers to arbitrarily delete user accounts via the /account/delete endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.4.
The User registration & user profile WordPress plugin through 2.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged-in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.
The WP Film Studio WordPress plugin before 1.3.5 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack
CSRF protection was not present in SquaredUp before version 4.6.0. A CSRF attack could have been possible by an administrator executing arbitrary code in a HTML dashboard tile via a crafted HTML page, or by uploading a malicious SVG payload into a dashboard.
PHPGurukul Hospital Management System v4.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the 'Add Doctor' module. The application fails to enforce CSRF token validation on the add-doctor.php endpoint. This allows remote attackers to create arbitrary Doctor accounts (privileged users) by tricking an authenticated administrator into visiting a malicious page.
SODOLA SL902-SWTGW124AS firmware versions through 200.1.20 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its management interface that allows attackers to induce authenticated users into submitting forged requests. Attackers can craft malicious requests that execute unauthorized configuration or administrative actions with the victim's privileges when the authenticated user visits a malicious webpage.
School Management Software PHP/mySQL through 2019-03-14 allows office_admin/?action=addadmin CSRF to add an administrative user.
Cups Easy (Purchase & Inventory) 1.0 is vulnerable to CSRF that leads to admin account deletion via userdelete.php.
Cross-site request forgery in Icegram Email Subscribers & Newsletters Plugin for WordPress v4.4.8 allows a remote attacker to send forged emails by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link.
IBM DataPower Gateway 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.16 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 192737.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 188898.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability may impact IBM Curam Social Program Management 7.0.9 and 7.0.10, which is an attack that forces a user to execute unwanted actions on the web application while they are currently authenticated. This applies to a single server class only, with no impact to remainder of web application. IBM X-Force ID: 189151.
Cross-site request forgery in Nagios XI 5.7.3 allows a remote attacker to perform sensitive application actions by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link.
IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Server 11.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186324.
YzmCMS v6.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily delete user accounts via /admin/admin_manage/delete.
A vulnerability was found in Pengu. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function runApp of the file src/index.js. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The name of the patch is aea66f12b8cdfc3c8c50ad6a9c89d8307e9d0a91. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216475.
A vulnerability was found in easyii CMS. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/sign/out. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A vulnerability was found in sah-comp bienlein and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is d7836a4f2b241e4745ede194f0f6fb47199cab6b. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-216473 was assigned to this vulnerability.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) issue in the NextGEN Gallery plugin before 3.5.0 for WordPress allows File Upload. (It is possible to bypass CSRF protection by simply not including a nonce parameter.)
katello-headpin is vulnerable to CSRF in REST API
The Delete All Comments Easily WordPress plugin through 1.3 is lacking Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) checks, which could result in an unauthenticated attacker making a logged in admin delete all comments from the blog.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the /usapi?method=add-user component of Magewell Pro Convert v1.2.213 allows attackers to arbitrarily create accounts via a crafted GET request.
BloofoxCMS 0.5.2.1 allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via 'mode=settings&page=editor', as demonstrated by use of 'mode=settings&page=editor' to change any file content (Locally/Remotely).
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ramon fincken Auto Prune Posts auto-prune-posts allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Auto Prune Posts: from n/a through <= 3.0.0.
The Omnishop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery on its /users/delete REST route in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9. The route’s permission_callback only verifies that the requester is logged in, but fails to require any nonce or other proof of intent. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
bloofoxCMS 0.5.2.1 is infected with a CSRF Attack that leads to an attacker editing any file content (Locally/Remotely).
ampache is a web based audio/video streaming application and file manager. A CSRF attack can be performed in order to delete objects (Playlist, smartlist etc.). Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is an attack that forces authenticated users to submit a request to a Web application against which they are currently authenticated. This vulnerability can be exploited by creating a malicious script with an arbitrary playlist ID belonging to another user. When the user submits the request, their playlist will be deleted. Any User with active sessions who are tricked into submitting a malicious request are impacted, as their playlists or other objects could be deleted without their consent.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM), Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME), and Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service (Unified CM IM&P) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. These actions could include modifying the device configuration and deleting (but not creating) user accounts.
A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment (HCM-F) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a targeted user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary requests that could change the password of a targeted user. An attacker could then take unauthorized actions on behalf of the targeted user.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SaifuMak Add Custom Codes add-custom-codes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Add Custom Codes: from n/a through <= 4.80.
CSRF in Web Compliance Manager in Quest Policy Authority 8.1.2.200 allows remote attackers to force user modification/creation via a specially crafted link to the submitUser.jsp file. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer
iBall WRD12EN 1.0.0 devices allow cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks as demonstrated by enabling DNS settings or modifying the range for IP addresses.
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1BE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/DC (6ES7211-1AE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1HE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1BE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1BG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1BG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1217C DC/DC/DC (6ES7217-1AG40-0XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2212-1AE40-1XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2214-1AG40-1XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AF40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HF40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AF40-5XB0). The web interface of the affected devices is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to change the CPU mode by tricking a legitimate and authenticated user with sufficient permissions on the target CPU to click on a malicious link.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in upgrade_step2.sh in MiCasaVerde VeraLite with firmware 1.5.408 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that install arbitrary firmware via the squashfs parameter.