An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Exchange Server, aka 'Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0686.
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager on Windows, Linux (Device Manager Server, Device Manager Agent, Host Data Collector components) allows Man in the Middle Attack.This issue affects Hitachi Device Manager: before 8.8.5-02.
.NET and Visual Studio Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
ASP.NET and Visual Studio Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0146.
The verify_certificate function in lib/vtls/schannel.c in libcurl 7.30.0 through 7.51.0, when built for Windows CE using the schannel TLS backend, makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks via a crafted wildcard SAN in a server certificate, as demonstrated by "*.com."
Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Microsoft Digest Authentication Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Netlogon RPC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Improper certificate validation in Azure Local allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 traditional could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system with a specially crafted sequence of serialized objects. IBM X-Force ID: 245513.
Windows Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Improper file verification vulnerability in SaAT Netizen installer ver.1.2.0.424 and earlier, and SaAT Netizen ver.1.2.0.8 (Build427) and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful exploitation may result in a malicious file being downloaded and executed.
IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 uses default credentials for potentially critical functionality.
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the "Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)" issue.
Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, and Windows Server 2008 SP2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted screensaver in a theme file, aka "Windows Theme File Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 for Windows XP SP2 and SP3; 7 for Server 2003 SP2; 7 for Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2; and 7 for Server 2008 SP2 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by calling the setCapture method on a collection of crafted objects, aka "Uninitialized Memory Corruption Vulnerability."
Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 SP1, 6 and 7 on Windows XP SP2 and SP3, 6 and 7 on Windows Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, 7 on Windows Vista Gold and SP1, and 7 on Windows Server 2008 does not properly handle transition errors in a request for one HTTP document followed by a request for a second HTTP document, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving (1) multiple crafted pages on a web site or (2) a web page with crafted inline content such as banner advertisements, aka "Page Transition Memory Corruption Vulnerability."
Windows Pragmatic General Multicast (PGM) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
When running Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.79 on Windows with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server.
Heap-based buffer overflow in the CreateDIBPatternBrushPt function in GDI in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista, and Server 2008 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an EMF or WMF image file with a malformed header that triggers an integer overflow, aka "GDI Heap Overflow Vulnerability."
Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Microsoft Intune Management Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Hitachi JP1/IT Desktop Management 2 Agent 9 through 12 contains a remote code execution vulnerability because of an Integer Overflow. An attacker with network access to port 31016 may exploit this issue to execute code with unrestricted privileges on the underlying OS.
This issues due to insufficient verification of the various input values from user’s input. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute malicious code in Firstmall via navercheckout_add function.
.NET Core Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
.NET Core Remote Code Execution Vulnerability