The CM Ad Changer – A simple tool to control and optimize your site's banners plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cmac_campaigns_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete arbitrary advertising campaigns, including their associated banner records and uploaded files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Mailer Plugin 391.ve4a_38c1b_cf4b_ and earlier allows attackers to use the DNS used by the Jenkins instance to resolve an attacker-specified hostname.

The Modular DS: Monitor, update, and backup multiple websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the postConfirmOauth() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect the plugin's OAuth/SSO connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Taqnix plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the taqnix_delete_my_account() function, where the check_ajax_referer() call is explicitly commented out on line 883. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in non-administrator user into deleting their own account via a forged request granted they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking a link or visiting a malicious page.

The WP Opt-in WordPress plugin through 1.4.1 is vulnerable to CSRF which allows changed plugin settings and can be used for sending spam emails.

A flaw has been found in SourceCodester Computer Laboratory Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

The Old Posts Highlighter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the OPH_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's configuration settings without authorization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A security vulnerability has been detected in osTicket up to 1.18.3. Impacted is an unknown function of the file include/class.dispatcher.php of the component Dispatcher. The manipulation of the argument _method leads to cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through a pull request but has not reacted yet.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Free plug in by SEO Roma Auto Tag Links auto-tag-links allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Auto Tag Links: from n/a through <= 1.0.13.

The Genzel breadcrumbs plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the _options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's breadcrumb configuration, including templates, delimiter, home label, home URI, and breadcrumb rules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Required Admin Menu Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Admin Menu Manager: from n/a through 1.0.3.

Edimax GS-5008PL firmware version 1.00.54 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by inducing logged-in administrators to visit malicious pages. Attackers can exploit the lack of anti-CSRF tokens and request validation to change passwords, upload firmware, reboot the device, perform factory resets, or modify network configurations.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in luk3thomas Bulk Content Creator bulk-content-creator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bulk Content Creator: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in fs-code Booknetic booknetic.This issue affects Booknetic: from n/a through <= 4.0.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in josesan WooCommerce Recargo de Equivalencia woo-recargo-de-equivalencia allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WooCommerce Recargo de Equivalencia: from n/a through <= 1.6.24.

The auto making JSON-LD plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amJL_certification function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's license key option, and subsequently trigger license validation and pro feature installation on the victim site without the administrator's consent via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation can trigger downstream calls to amJL_is_license_valid() and amJL_download_and_install_pro_features(), meaning the impact extends beyond a simple settings change to unauthorized installation of plugin components.

The Search Simple Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the search_simple_fields_options() function in functions_admin.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings — including post types to search in, custom fields, media fields and the custom media function name — via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Lobot Slider Administrator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the fourty_slider_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin slider-page configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The CDN Linker lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ossdl_off_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings — including the CDN URL used to rewrite all static asset references on the site — via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The GoStats for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gostats_manage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings (gostats_siteid and gostats_server options) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10Web Photo Gallery by 10Web photo-gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Photo Gallery by 10Web: from n/a through <= 1.8.37.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Quiz Maker quiz-maker allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Quiz Maker: from n/a through <= 6.7.1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in seyyed-amir Erima Zarinpal Donate erima-zarinpal-donate allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Erima Zarinpal Donate: from n/a through <= 1.0.

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2.0.0 through 5.2.6.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 172363.

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 172706.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Janis Elsts Admin Menu Editor admin-menu-editor allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Admin Menu Editor: from n/a through <= 1.14.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Magazine3 Easy Table of Contents easy-table-of-contents allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Easy Table of Contents: from n/a through <= 2.0.80.

The MetaMagic SEO Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metamagic_update_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's SEO settings, including enabling or disabling the plugin and toggling description and keyword meta tag output via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Student Grades Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in desertthemes Corpiva corpiva allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Corpiva: from n/a through <= 1.0.96.

IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 158015.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Musa AVCI Önceki Yazı Link onceki-yazi-linki allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Önceki Yazı Link: from n/a through <= 1.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Corner Quick Event Calendar quick-event-calendar allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Quick Event Calendar: from n/a through <= 1.4.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ixiter Simple Google Sitemap simple-google-sitemap allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Google Sitemap: from n/a through <= 1.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Will Anderson Minimum Password Strength minimum-password-strength allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Minimum Password Strength: from n/a through <= 1.2.0.

The Ultimate Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.14. This is due to a flawed nonce validation conditional in the 'handle_module_actions' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to toggle plugin modules on or off via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Games Catalog plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gc_crud() function which handles the delete action (action=delete) via a GET request without any wp_verify_nonce() / check_admin_referer() call. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary game catalog entries (including the associated WordPress post created for the game) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wptom All-In-One Cufon all-in-one-cufon allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects All-In-One Cufon: from n/a through <= 1.3.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brizy Brizy Pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Brizy Pro: from n/a through 2.6.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in queeez WP-PostRatings Cheater wp-postratings-cheater allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP-PostRatings Cheater: from n/a through <= 1.5.

Hereta ETH-IMC408M firmware version 1.0.15 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify device configuration by exploiting missing CSRF protections in setup.cgi. Attackers can host malicious pages that submit forged requests using automatically-included HTTP Basic Authentication credentials to add RADIUS accounts, alter network settings, or trigger diagnostics.

The Colibri Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.253. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cp_shortcode_refresh() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Bludit version 3.16.1 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the /admin/uninstall-plugin/ and /admin/install-theme/ endpoints. The application does not implement anti-CSRF tokens or other request origin validation mechanisms for these administrative actions. An attacker can induce an authenticated administrator to visit a malicious page that silently submits crafted requests, resulting in unauthorized plugin uninstallation or theme installation. This may lead to loss of functionality, execution of untrusted code via malicious themes, and compromise of system integrity.

Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 16.0.1 and prior to version 16.1.7, `origin: null` was treated as a "missing" origin during Server Action CSRF validation. As a result, requests from opaque contexts (such as sandboxed iframes) could bypass origin verification instead of being validated as cross-origin requests. An attacker could induce a victim browser to submit Server Actions from a sandboxed context, potentially executing state-changing actions with victim credentials (CSRF). This is fixed in version 16.1.7 by treating `'null'` as an explicit origin value and enforcing host/origin checks unless `'null'` is explicitly allowlisted in `experimental.serverActions.allowedOrigins`. If upgrading is not immediately possible, add CSRF tokens for sensitive Server Actions, prefer `SameSite=Strict` on sensitive auth cookies, and/or do not allow `'null'` in `serverActions.allowedOrigins` unless intentionally required and additionally protected.

A vulnerability was found in CoreHR Core Portal up to 27.0.7. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 27.0.8 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in Global Content Blocks Plugin 2.1.5. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely.

Teradek VidiU Pro 3.0.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change administrative passwords without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that automatically submit password change requests to the device when a logged-in administrator visits the page.

The ImageRecycle pdf & image compression plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the enableOptimization function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enable image optimization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IT-RAYS RAYS Grid rays-grid allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RAYS Grid: from n/a through <= 1.3.1.

The JMX monitoring flag in Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center before version 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to turn the JMX monitoring flag off or on via a Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.