Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
CVE Vulnerability Details :
CVE-2026-47734
PUBLISHED
More InfoOfficial Page
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
View Known Exploited Vulnerability (KEV) details
Published At-10 Jun, 2026 | 22:11
Updated At-10 Jun, 2026 | 22:11
Rejected At-
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
Dulwich has unbounded memory allocation in receive-pack from crafted thin packs

Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes) whose delta header declares a huge dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git's semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server's repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run the server under an OS-level memory limit (e.g. ulimit, cgroups/MemoryMax, or a container memory limit) so a malicious push is killed rather than taking down the host.

Affected Products
Vendor
jelmer
Product
dulwich
Versions
Affected
  • >= 0.1.0, < 1.2.5
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-400CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
CWECWE-789CWE-789: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-400
Description: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-789
Description: CWE-789: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.7MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.7
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Details not found