A protocol or its implementation supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is available to both parties.
When a security mechanism can be forced to downgrade to use a less secure algorithm, this can make it easier for attackers to compromise the product by exploiting weaker algorithm. The victim might not be aware that the less secure algorithm is being used. For example, if an attacker can force a communications channel to use cleartext instead of strongly-encrypted data, then the attacker could read the channel by sniffing, instead of going through extra effort of trying to decrypt the data using brute force techniques.
| Nature | Mapping | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChildOf | Discouraged | P | 693 | Protection Mechanism Failure |
| ParentOf | Allowed | B | 1328 | Security Version Number Mutable to Older Versions |
| Nature | Mapping | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MemberOf | Prohibited | C | 957 | SFP Secondary Cluster: Protocol Error |
| MemberOf | Prohibited | C | 1013 | Encrypt Data |
| MemberOf | Prohibited | C | 1346 | OWASP Top Ten 2021 Category A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures |
| MemberOf | Prohibited | C | 1413 | Comprehensive Categorization: Protection Mechanism Failure |
| Nature | Mapping | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MemberOf | Prohibited | BS | BOSS-316 | Bypass Protection Mechanism (impact) |
| Nature | Mapping | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MemberOf | Prohibited | C | 1013 | Encrypt Data |
| Nature | Mapping | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MemberOf | Prohibited | C | 1346 | OWASP Top Ten 2021 Category A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures |
| Nature | Mapping | Type | ID | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MemberOf | Prohibited | C | 957 | SFP Secondary Cluster: Protocol Error |
| Scope | Likelihood | Impact | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access Control | N/A | Bypass Protection Mechanism | N/A |
COMMISSION: This weakness refers to an incorrect design related to an architectural security tactic.
| Reference | Description |
|---|---|
| CVE-2006-4302 | Attacker can select an older version of the software to exploit its vulnerabilities. |
| CVE-2006-4407 | Improper prioritization of encryption ciphers during negotiation leads to use of a weaker cipher. |
| CVE-2005-2969 | chain: SSL/TLS implementation disables a verification step (CWE-325) that enables a downgrade attack to a weaker protocol. |
| CVE-2001-1444 | Telnet protocol implementation allows downgrade to weaker authentication and encryption using an Adversary-in-the-Middle AITM attack. |
| CVE-2002-1646 | SSH server implementation allows override of configuration setting to use weaker authentication schemes. This may be a composite with CWE-642. |
| Ordinality | Description |
|---|
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
N/A
This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.
Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
This is related to CWE-300, although not all downgrade attacks necessarily require an entity that redirects or interferes with the network. See examples.
N/A
| Taxonomy Name | Entry ID | Fit | Entry Name |
|---|