Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
CWE-80:Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)
Weakness ID:80
Version:v4.17
Weakness Name:Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)
Vulnerability Mapping:Allowed
Abstraction:Variant
Structure:Simple
Status:Incomplete
Likelihood of Exploit:High
DetailsContent HistoryObserved CVE ExamplesReports
▼Description

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages.

▼Extended Description

This may allow such characters to be treated as control characters, which are executed client-side in the context of the user's session. Although this can be classified as an injection problem, the more pertinent issue is the improper conversion of such special characters to respective context-appropriate entities before displaying them to the user.

▼Alternate Terms
▼Relationships
Relevant to the view"Research Concepts - (1000)"
NatureMappingTypeIDName
ChildOfAllowedB79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Nature: ChildOf
Mapping: Allowed
Type: Base
ID: 79
Name: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
▼Memberships
NatureMappingTypeIDName
MemberOfProhibitedC990SFP Secondary Cluster: Tainted Input to Command
MemberOfProhibitedC1347OWASP Top Ten 2021 Category A03:2021 - Injection
MemberOfProhibitedC1409Comprehensive Categorization: Injection
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type:Category
ID: 990
Name: SFP Secondary Cluster: Tainted Input to Command
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type:Category
ID: 1347
Name: OWASP Top Ten 2021 Category A03:2021 - Injection
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type:Category
ID: 1409
Name: Comprehensive Categorization: Injection
▼Tags
NatureMappingTypeIDName
MemberOfProhibitedBSBOSS-274High likelihood of exploit
MemberOfProhibitedBSBOSS-284Output Encoding Strategy
MemberOfProhibitedBSBOSS-286Attack Surface Reduction Strategy
MemberOfProhibitedBSBOSS-294Not Language-Specific Weaknesses
MemberOfProhibitedBSBOSS-311Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands (impact)
MemberOfProhibitedBSBOSS-328Read Application Data (impact)
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type:BOSSView
ID: BOSS-274
Name: High likelihood of exploit
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type:BOSSView
ID: BOSS-284
Name: Output Encoding Strategy
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type:BOSSView
ID: BOSS-286
Name: Attack Surface Reduction Strategy
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type:BOSSView
ID: BOSS-294
Name: Not Language-Specific Weaknesses
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type:BOSSView
ID: BOSS-311
Name: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands (impact)
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type:BOSSView
ID: BOSS-328
Name: Read Application Data (impact)
▼Relevant To View
Relevant to the view"OWASP Top Ten (2021) - (1344)"
NatureMappingTypeIDName
MemberOfProhibitedC1347OWASP Top Ten 2021 Category A03:2021 - Injection
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type: Category
ID: 1347
Name: OWASP Top Ten 2021 Category A03:2021 - Injection
Relevant to the view"Software Fault Pattern (SFP) Clusters - (888)"
NatureMappingTypeIDName
MemberOfProhibitedC990SFP Secondary Cluster: Tainted Input to Command
Nature: MemberOf
Mapping: Prohibited
Type: Category
ID: 990
Name: SFP Secondary Cluster: Tainted Input to Command
▼Background Detail

▼Common Consequences
ScopeLikelihoodImpactNote
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailabilityN/ARead Application DataExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
N/A
Scope: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability
Likelihood: N/A
Impact: Read Application Data, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Note:
N/A
▼Potential Mitigations
Phase:Implementation
Mitigation ID:
Strategy:
Effectiveness:
Description:

Carefully check each input parameter against a rigorous positive specification (allowlist) defining the specific characters and format allowed. All input should be neutralized, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. We often encounter data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended.

Note:


Phase:Implementation
Mitigation ID: MIT-30.1
Strategy: Output Encoding
Effectiveness:
Description:

Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component.

The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.

Note:


Phase:Implementation
Mitigation ID: MIT-43
Strategy:
Effectiveness:
Description:

With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.

Note:


Phase:Implementation
Mitigation ID: MIT-31
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Description:

To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XMLHTTPRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.

Note:

▼Modes Of Introduction
Phase: Implementation
Note:

N/A

▼Applicable Platforms
Languages
Class: Not Language-Specific(Undetermined Prevalence)
▼Demonstrative Examples
Example 1

In the following example, a guestbook comment isn't properly encoded, filtered, or otherwise neutralized for script-related tags before being displayed in a client browser.

Language: ( code)
N/A

Language: JSP(Bad code)
<% for (Iterator i = guestbook.iterator(); i.hasNext(); ) { Entry e = (Entry) i.next(); %> <p>Entry #<%= e.getId() %></p> <p><%= e.getText() %></p> <% } %>

▼Observed Examples
ReferenceDescription
CVE-2002-0938
XSS in parameter in a link.
CVE-2002-1495
XSS in web-based email product via attachment filenames.
CVE-2003-1136
HTML injection in posted message.
CVE-2004-2171
XSS not quoted in error page.
Reference: CVE-2002-0938
Description:
XSS in parameter in a link.
Reference: CVE-2002-1495
Description:
XSS in web-based email product via attachment filenames.
Reference: CVE-2003-1136
Description:
HTML injection in posted message.
Reference: CVE-2004-2171
Description:
XSS not quoted in error page.
▼Affected Resources
    ▼Functional Areas
      ▼Weakness Ordinalities
      OrdinalityDescription
      Primary
      N/A
      Ordinality: Primary
      Description:
      N/A
      ▼Detection Methods
      Automated Static Analysis
      Detection Method ID:DM-14
      Description:

      Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

      Effectiveness:High
      Note:

      N/A

      ▼Vulnerability Mapping Notes
      Usage:Allowed
      Reason:Acceptable-Use
      Rationale:

      This CWE entry is at the Variant level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.

      Comments:

      Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.

      Suggestions:
      ▼Notes
      ▼Taxonomy Mappings
      Taxonomy NameEntry IDFitEntry Name
      PLOVERN/AN/ABasic XSS
      Software Fault PatternsSFP24N/ATainted input to command
      Taxonomy Name: PLOVER
      Entry ID: N/A
      Fit: N/A
      Entry Name: Basic XSS
      Taxonomy Name: Software Fault Patterns
      Entry ID: SFP24
      Fit: N/A
      Entry Name: Tainted input to command
      ▼Related Attack Patterns
      IDName
      CAPEC-18
      XSS Targeting Non-Script Elements
      CAPEC-193
      PHP Remote File Inclusion
      CAPEC-32
      XSS Through HTTP Query Strings
      CAPEC-86
      XSS Through HTTP Headers
      ID: CAPEC-18
      Name: XSS Targeting Non-Script Elements
      ID: CAPEC-193
      Name: PHP Remote File Inclusion
      ID: CAPEC-32
      Name: XSS Through HTTP Query Strings
      ID: CAPEC-86
      Name: XSS Through HTTP Headers
      ▼References
      Details not found