WordPress before 5.2.4 does not properly consider type confusion during validation of the referer in the admin pages, possibly leading to CSRF.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wp-login.php in WordPress 3.7.4, 3.8.4, 3.9.2, and 4.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that reset passwords.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wp-admin/post.php in WordPress before 4.2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that lock a post, and consequently cause a denial of service (editing blockage), via a get-post-lock action.
In WordPress before 4.7.5, a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the filesystem credentials dialog because a nonce is not required for updating credentials.
In WordPress before 4.7.3, there is cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Press This (wp-admin/includes/class-wp-press-this.php), leading to excessive use of server resources. The CSRF can trigger an outbound HTTP request for a large file that is then parsed by Press This.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple Century Systems routers including XR-410 before 1.6.9, XR-510 before 3.5.3, XR-440 before 1.7.8, and other XR series routers from XR-510 to XR-730 allows remote attackers to modify configuration as the administrator via unknown vectors.
Various resources in the Crowd Demo application of Atlassian Crowd before version 3.1.1 allow remote attackers to modify add, modify and delete users & groups via a Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Please be aware that the Demo application is not enabled by default.
In PiranhaCMS, versions 4.0.0-alpha1 to 9.2.0 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) when performing various actions supported by the management system, such as deleting a user, deleting a role, editing a post, deleting a media folder etc., when an ID is known.
It was found that the AMQ Online console is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is exploitable in cases where preflight checks are not instigated or bypassed. For example authorised users using an older browser with Adobe Flash are vulnerable when targeted by an attacker. This flaw affects all versions of AMQ-Online prior to 1.5.2 and Enmasse versions 0.31.0-rc1 up until but not including 0.32.2.