An issue was discovered in Cscms 4.1.0. There is an admin.php/pay CSRF vulnerability that can change the payment account to redirect funds.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to event deletion was discovered in Spiffy Calendar WordPress plugin (versions <= 4.9.0).
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in StylemixThemes eRoom – Zoom Meetings & Webinar (WordPress plugin) <= 1.3.8 allows cache deletion.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in StylemixThemes eRoom – Zoom Meetings & Webinar (WordPress plugin) <= 1.3.7 allows an attacker to Sync with Zoom Meetings.
Prior to microweber/microweber v1.2.20, due to improper neutralization of input, an attacker can steal tokens to perform cross-site request forgery, fetch contents from same-site and redirect a user.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Access Demo Importer <= 1.0.7 on WordPress allows an attacker to activate any installed plugin.
YzmCMS v6.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily delete user accounts via /admin/admin_manage/delete.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Publish Over SSH Plugin 1.22 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified SSH server using attacker-specified credentials.
IBM Business Automation Workflow traditional 21.0.1 through 21.0.3, 20.0.0.1 through 20.0.0.2, 19.0.0.1 through 19.0.0.3, 18.0.0.0 through 18.0.0.1, IBM Business Automation Workflow containers V21.0.1 - V21.0.3 20.0.0.1 through 20.0.0.2, IBM Business Process Manager 8.6.0.0 through 8.6.0.201803, and 8.5.0.0 through 8.5.0.201706 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
PeteReport Version 0.5 contains a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allowing an attacker to trick users into deleting users, products, reports and findings on the application.
VMware Workspace ONE Access, Identity Manager and vRealize Automation contain a cross site request forgery vulnerability. A malicious actor can trick a user through a cross site request forgery to unintentionally validate a malicious JDBC URI.
The Import CSV Files WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not sanitise and escaped imported data before outputting them back in a page, and is lacking CSRF check when performing such action as well, resulting in a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting
A vulnerability was found in XYZScripts Contact Form Manager Plugin. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Download Manager Plugin 2.8.99. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Mailer Plugin 391.ve4a_38c1b_cf4b_ and earlier allows attackers to use the DNS used by the Jenkins instance to resolve an attacker-specified hostname.
The Cache Images WordPress plugin before 3.2.1 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make any logged user upload images via a CSRF attack.
The WP Opt-in WordPress plugin through 1.4.1 is vulnerable to CSRF which allows changed plugin settings and can be used for sending spam emails.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2 can cause unwanted items to be added to a shopper's cart due to an insufficiently robust anti-CSRF token implementation.
A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (SME), Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM and Presence (Unified CM IM&P) Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a targeted user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary requests that could change the password of a targeted user. An attacker could then take unauthorized actions on behalf of the targeted user.
The ServiceExecutor resource in Jira before version 8.3.2 allows remote attackers to trigger the creation of export files via a Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
JioFi 4G M2S 1.0.2 devices have CSRF via the SSID name and Security Key field under Edit Wi-Fi Settings (aka a SetWiFi_Setting request to cgi-bin/qcmap_web_cgi).
An issue was discovered in PHPMyWind 5.5. The GetQQ function in include/func.class.php allows XSS via the cfg_qqcode parameter. This can be exploited via CSRF.
The Jira-importers-plugin in Atlassian Jira before version 7.6.1 allows remote attackers to create new projects and abort an executing external system import via various Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities.
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2.0.0 through 5.2.6.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 172363.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 172706.
IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 158015.
A flaw was found in the /oauth/token/request custom endpoint of the OpenShift OAuth server allowing for XSS generation of CLI tokens due to missing X-Frame-Options and CSRF protections. If not otherwise prevented, a separate XSS vulnerability via JavaScript could further allow for the extraction of these tokens.
OTCMS v3.85 has CSRF in the admin/member_deal.php Admin Panel page, leading to creation of a new management group account, as demonstrated by superadmin.
The IncomingMailServers resource in Atlassian Jira before version 7.6.2 allows remote attackers to modify the "incoming mail" whitelist setting via a Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
The JMX monitoring flag in Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center before version 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to turn the JMX monitoring flag off or on via a Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center in affected versions allows remote attackers to modify logging and profiling settings via a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. The affected versions are before version 7.13.3, and from version 8.0.0 before 8.1.0.
An issue was discovered in Landing-CMS 0.0.6. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can change the admin's password via the password/ URI,
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to modify Wallboard settings via a Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. The affected versions are before version 7.13.9, and from version 8.0.0 before 8.4.2.
Various installation setup resources in Jira before version 8.5.2 allow remote attackers to configure a Jira instance, which has not yet finished being installed, via Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Event Notices Settings of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. An attacker can create/update event notices via RAPR/EventNoticesSet.html.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Create/Delete Accounts functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can Create and Delete accounts via RAPR/TriggerServerFunction.html.
An issue was discovered in Selesta Visual Access Manager (VAM) 4.15.0 through 4.29. It allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on any HTML form. An attacker can exploit the vulnerability to abuse functionalities such as change password, add user, add privilege, and so on.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Network Setting functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can manipulate the SMTP setting and other network settings via RAPR/NetworkSettingsSet.html.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the FTP Settings of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. Exploitation of this vulnerability can result in manipulation of Server FTP settings at RAPR/FTPSettingsSet.html.
Intelbras WRN 150 1.0.18 devices allow CSRF via GO=system_password.asp to the goform/SysToolChangePwd URI to change a password.
The WordPress plugin, Email Subscribers & Newsletters, before 4.2.3 had a flaw that allowed for CSRF to be exploited on all plugin settings.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the File Types component of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1 that allows an attacker to add or delete the file types that are used on the server via RAPR/TriggerServerFunction.html.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the apache2-slms package in SUSE Lifecycle Management Server (SLMS) 1.0 on SUSE Linux Enterprise (SLE) 11 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors related to improper parameter quoting. NOTE: some sources report that this is a vulnerability in a product named "Apache SLMS," but that is incorrect.
An issue was discovered in fastadmin 1.0.0.20190705_beta. There is a public/admin/general.config/edit CSRF vulnerability, as demonstrated by resultant XSS via the row[name] parameter.
A vulnerability in the FindMe feature of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of the affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a maliciously crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected system with the privileges of the user. The arbitrary actions include adding an attacker-controlled device and redirecting calls intended for a specific user. For more information about CSRF attacks and potential mitigations, see Understanding Cross-Site Request Forgery Threat Vectors. This vulnerability is fixed in software version X12.5.1 and later.
The Jquery Validation For Contact Form 7 WordPress plugin before 5.3 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change Blog options like default_role, users_can_register via a CSRF attack
WTCMS 1.0 allows index.php?g=admin&m=index&a=index CSRF with resultant XSS.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Mantis Plugin 0.26 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified web server using attacker-specified credentials.
A vulnerability in the vManage web-based UI (web UI) of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected instance of vManage. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious, customized link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user.