Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the underConstruction plugin before 1.09 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that deactivate a plugin via unspecified vectors.

themegrill-demo-importer before 1.6.3 allows CSRF, as demonstrated by wiping the database.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) issue in the NextGEN Gallery plugin before 3.5.0 for WordPress allows File Upload and Local File Inclusion via settings modification, leading to Remote Code Execution and XSS. (It is possible to bypass CSRF protection by simply not including a nonce parameter.)

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Mail On Update plugin before 5.2.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the "List of alternative recipients" via the mailonupdate_mailto parameter in the mail-on-update page to wp-admin/options-general.php. NOTE: a third party claims that 5.2.1 and 5.2.2 are also vulnerable, but the issue might require a separate CVE identifier since this might reflect an incomplete fix.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Services module 6.x-3.x and 7.x-3.x before 7.x-3.4 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

An issue was discovered in the XCloner Backup and Restore plugin before 4.2.153 for WordPress. It allows CSRF (via almost any endpoint).

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in frontview/lib/np_handler.pl in NETGEAR ReadyNAS RAIDiator before 4.1.12 and 4.2.x before 4.2.24 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the FourSquare Checkins plugin before 1.3 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Contextual Related Posts plugin before 1.8.7 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via unspecified vectors.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins database Plugin 1.6 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary SQL scripts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Admin web interface in OpenVPN Access Server before 1.8.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Time Spent module 6.x and 7.x for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Open OnDemand before 1.5.7 and 1.6.x before 1.6.22 allows CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Add/Edit page (adminmenus.php) in the WP125 plugin before 1.5.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add or edit an ad via unspecified vectors.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link while having an active session on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Administrative console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.47, 7.0 before 7.0.0.31, 8.0 before 8.0.0.7, and 8.5 before 8.5.5.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Calendar plugin before 1.3.3 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that add a calendar entry via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the All in One Webmaster plugin before 8.2.4 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in action.php in Leed (Light Feed), possibly before 1.5 Stable, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for unspecified requests, related to the lack of an anti-CSRF token.

The site-offline plugin before 1.4.4 for WordPress lacks certain wp_create_nonce and wp_verify_nonce calls, aka CSRF.

An issue was discovered in the PushToWatch extension for MediaWiki through 1.35.1. The primary form did not implement an anti-CSRF token and therefore was completely vulnerable to CSRF attacks against onSkinAddFooterLinks in PushToWatch.php.

JTBC(PHP) 3.0.1.7 has CSRF via the console/xml/manage.php?type=action&action=edit URI, as demonstrated by an XSS payload in the content parameter.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Options in the WP-Print plugin before 2.52 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that manipulate plugin settings via unspecified vectors.

Vert.x-Web framework v4.0 milestone 1-4 does not perform a correct CSRF verification. Instead of comparing the CSRF token in the request with the CSRF token in the cookie, it compares the CSRF token in the cookie against a CSRF token that is stored in the session. An attacker does not even need to provide a CSRF token in the request because the framework does not consider it. The cookies are automatically sent by the browser and the verification will always succeed, leading to a successful CSRF attack.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apply.cgi in Belkin N300 (F7D7301v1) router allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify configuration.

WordPress plugin wp-cleanfix has Remote Code Execution

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Content Slide plugin 1.4.2 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change plugin settings via unspecified vectors.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects GS716Tv3 before 6.3.1.36 and GS724Tv4 before 6.3.1.36.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in util_system.html in Belkin N900 router allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change configuration settings including passwords and remote management ports.

The CSRF protection mechanism implemented in the web administration panel on NETGEAR JGS516PE/GS116Ev2 v2.6.0.43 devices could be bypassed by omitting the CSRF token parameter in HTTP requests.

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WordPress uListing plugin (versions <= 2.0.5) as it lacks CSRF checks on plugin administration pages.

A vulnerability in the Cisco Firepower Chassis Manager (FCM) of Cisco FXOS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against a user of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the FCM interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a targeted user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary requests that could take unauthorized actions on behalf of the targeted user.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in process_bug.cgi in Bugzilla 4.4.x before 4.4.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify bugs via vectors involving a midair-collision token.

An issue was discovered in WUZHI CMS 4.1.0. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can change the super administrator's username via index.php?m=member&f=index&v=edit&uid=1.

A vulnerability exists in CakePHP versions 4.0.x through 4.1.3. The CsrfProtectionMiddleware component allows method override parameters to bypass CSRF checks by changing the HTTP request method to an arbitrary string that is not in the list of request methods that CakePHP checks. Additionally, the route middleware does not verify that this overriden method (which can be an arbitrary string) is actually an HTTP method.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) node request management, (2) live management, and (3) user administration components in the console in Puppet Enterprise (PE) before 2.7.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

An issue was discovered in Joomla! 2.5.0 through 3.9.22. A missing token check in the emailexport feature of com_privacy causes a CSRF vulnerability.

Opera before 12.13 does not send CORS preflight requests in all required cases, which allows remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a crafted web site that triggers a CORS request.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Cisco Unity Express with software before 8.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCue35910.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in testingLibraryAction.do in the Training Center testing library in Cisco WebEx Training Center allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete tests, aka Bug ID CSCzu81067.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Western Bridge Cobub Razor 0.7.2 via /index.php?/user/createNewUser/, resulting in account creation.

IBM StoredIQ 7.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 153118.

An issue was discovered in SmartStoreNET before 4.1.0. Lack of Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection may lead to elevation of privileges (e.g., /admin/customer/create to create an admin account).

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in attachment.cgi in Bugzilla 2.x, 3.x, and 4.0.x before 4.0.11; 4.1.x and 4.2.x before 4.2.7; and 4.3.x and 4.4.x before 4.4.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that commit an attachment change via an update action.

An issue was discovered in JTBC(PHP) 3.0.1.7. aboutus/manage.php?type=action&action=add allows CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Novell iManager 2.7 before SP6 Patch 1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users by leveraging improper request validation by iManager code deployed within an Apache Tomcat container.

Remote Cross-site Request forgery (CSRF) potential has been identified in UCMBD Server version DDM Content Pack V 10.20, 10.21, 10.22, 10.22 CUP7, 10.30, 10.31, 10.32, 10.33, 10.33 CUP2, 11.0 and CMS Server version 2018.05 BACKGROUND which could allow for remote unsafe deserialization and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in web GUI of Secomea GateManager allows an attacker to execute malicious code. This issue affects: Secomea GateManager All versions prior to 9.4.

OpenAsset Digital Asset Management (DAM) through 12.0.19 does not correctly verify whether a request made to the application was intentionally made by the user, allowing for cross-site request forgery attacks on all user functions.