A CSRF vulnerability exists in rails <= 6.0.3 rails-ujs module that could allow attackers to send CSRF tokens to wrong domains.

IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Server 11.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186324.

WordPress before 5.5.2 allows CSRF attacks that change a theme's background image.

A bug in popup notifications delay calculation could have made it possible for an attacker to trick a user into granting permissions. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 116, Firefox ESR < 102.14, and Firefox ESR < 115.1.

Insufficient policy enforcement in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 74.0.3729.108 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page.

WordPress before 5.2.4 does not properly consider type confusion during validation of the referer in the admin pages, possibly leading to CSRF.

In phpBB before 3.1.7-PL1, includes/acp/acp_bbcodes.php has improper verification of a CSRF token on the BBCode page in the Administration Control Panel. An actual CSRF attack is possible if an attacker also manages to retrieve the session id of a reauthenticated administrator prior to targeting them.

Wikimedia MediaWiki through 1.32.1 allows CSRF.

Horde Trean, as used in Horde Groupware Webmail Edition through 5.2.22 and other products, allows CSRF, as demonstrated by the treanBookmarkTags parameter to the trean/ URI on a webmail server. NOTE: treanBookmarkTags could, for example, be a stored XSS payload.

Roland Gruber Softwareentwicklung LDAP Account Manager before 6.3 places a CSRF token in the sec_token parameter of a URI, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat a CSRF protection mechanism by leveraging logging.

NPAPI plugins, such as Adobe Flash, can send non-simple cross-origin requests, bypassing CORS by making a same-origin POST that does a 307 redirect to the target site. This allows for a malicious site to engage in cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 60, Thunderbird < 52.9, Firefox ESR < 60.1, Firefox ESR < 52.9, and Firefox < 61.

In WordPress before 4.7.5, a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the filesystem credentials dialog because a nonce is not required for updating credentials.

In WordPress before 4.7.5, there is improper handling of post meta data values in the XML-RPC API.

CSRF was discovered in the web UI in Deluge before 1.3.14. The exploitation methodology involves (1) hosting a crafted plugin that executes an arbitrary program from its __init__.py file and (2) causing the victim to download, install, and enable this plugin.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) shut down daemons, (2) start daemons, (3) add shares, (4) remove shares, (5) add printers, (6) remove printers, (7) add user accounts, or (8) remove user accounts, as demonstrated by certain start, stop, and restart parameters to the status program.

In the Open Build Service (OBS) before version 2.4.6 the CSRF protection is incorrectly disabled in the web interface, allowing for requests without the user's consent.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Totara LMS up to 18.7. This affects an unknown part of the component User Selector. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 13.46, 14.38, 15.33, 16.27, 17.21 and 18.8 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ChurchCRM v4.5.3 allows attackers to set a person to a user and set that user to be an Administrator.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pbx/gate in Brekeke PBX 2.4.4.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that change passwords via the pbxadmin.web.PbxUserEdit bean.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fujitsu e-Pares V01 L01 V01 L01, L03, L10, L20, L30, and L40 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that modify "facility reservation data" via unknown vectors.

The `PaperCutNG Mobility Print` version 1.0.3512 application allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform a CSRF attack on an instance administrator to configure the clients host (in the "configure printer discovery" section). This is possible because the application has no protections against CSRF attacks, like Anti-CSRF tokens, header origin validation, samesite cookies, etc.

IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 245400.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the rootpw plugin in rPath Appliance Platform Agent 2 and 3 allows remote attackers to reset the root password as the administrator via a crafted URL.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin.php in eTicket 1.5.5.2 allows remote attackers to change the administrative password and possibly perform other administrative tasks. NOTE: either the old password must be known, or the attacker must leverage a separate SQL injection vulnerability.

An Anti CSRF mechanism was discovered missing in the Teradici Cloud Access Connector v31 and earlier in a specific web form, which allowed an attacker with knowledge of both a machineID and user GUID to modify data if a user clicked a malicious link.

The Entity Embed module provides a filter to allow embedding entities in content fields. In certain circumstances, the filter could allow an unprivileged user to inject HTML into a page when it is accessed by a trusted user with permission to embed entities. In some cases, this could lead to cross-site scripting.

@fastify/csrf-protection is a plugin which helps protect Fastify servers against CSRF attacks. The CSRF protection enforced by the @fastify/csrf-protection library in combination with @fastify/cookie can be bypassed from network and same-site attackers under certain conditions. @fastify/csrf-protection supports an optional userInfo parameter that binds the CSRF token to the user. This parameter has been introduced to prevent cookie-tossing attacks as a fix for CVE-2021-29624. Whenever userInfo parameter is missing, or its value can be predicted for the target user account, network and same-site attackers can 1. fixate a _csrf cookie in the victim's browser, and 2. forge CSRF tokens that are valid for the victim's session. This allows attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism. As a fix, @fastify/csrf-protection starting from version 6.3.0 (and v4.1.0) includes a server-defined secret hmacKey that cryptographically binds the CSRF token to the value of the _csrf cookie and the userInfo parameter, making tokens non-spoofable by attackers. This protection is effective as long as the userInfo parameter is unique for each user. This is patched in versions 6.3.0 and v4.1.0. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may use a random, non-predictable userInfo parameter for each user as a mitigation.

Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack.

A data modification vulnerability exists in Jenkins Job Import Plugin 3.0 and earlier in JobImportAction.java that allows attackers to copy jobs from a preconfigured other Jenkins instance, potentially installing additional plugins necessary to load the imported job's configuration.

ampache is a web based audio/video streaming application and file manager. A CSRF attack can be performed in order to delete objects (Playlist, smartlist etc.). Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is an attack that forces authenticated users to submit a request to a Web application against which they are currently authenticated. This vulnerability can be exploited by creating a malicious script with an arbitrary playlist ID belonging to another user. When the user submits the request, their playlist will be deleted. Any User with active sessions who are tricked into submitting a malicious request are impacted, as their playlists or other objects could be deleted without their consent.

A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo PXM30-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM30.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W100-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W100-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W200-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W200-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41). A Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in the “Import Files“ functionality of the “Operation” web application due to the missing validation of anti-CSRF tokens or other origin checks. A remote unauthenticated attacker can upload and enable permanent arbitrary JavaScript code into the device just by convincing a victim to visit a specifically crafted webpage while logged-in to the device web application.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins 2.329 and earlier, LTS 2.319.1 and earlier allows attackers to trigger build of job without parameters when no security realm is set.

A CSRF vulnerability in the Tutor LMS plugin before 1.5.3 for WordPress can result in an attacker approving themselves as an instructor and performing other malicious actions (such as blocking legitimate instructors).