Horse Market Sell & Rent Portal Script 1.5.7 has a CSRF vulnerability through which an attacker can change all of the target's account information remotely.
Tooltipy (tooltips for WP) version 5 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Settings page that can result in could allow anybody to duplicate posts. This attack appear to be exploitable via Admin must follow a link. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 5.1.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins JUnit Plugin 1.25 and earlier in TestObject.java that allows setting the description of a test result.
IBM Security Guardium Insights 2.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 174406.
Bolt CMS before version 3.7.1 lacked CSRF protection in the preview generating endpoint. Previews are intended to be generated by the admins, developers, chief-editors, and editors, who are authorized to create content in the application. But due to lack of proper CSRF protection, unauthorized users could generate a preview. This has been fixed in Bolt 3.7.1
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability may impact IBM Curam Social Program Management 7.0.9 and 7.0.10, which is an attack that forces a user to execute unwanted actions on the web application while they are currently authenticated. This applies to a single server class only, with no impact to remainder of web application. IBM X-Force ID: 189151.
HTTP response splitting vulnerability in index.php in phpSysInfo 2.4 and earlier, as used in phpgroupware 0.9.16 and earlier, and egroupware before 1.0.0.009, allows remote attackers to spoof web content and poison web caches via CRLF sequences in the charset parameter.
The Omnishop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery on its /users/delete REST route in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9. The route’s permission_callback only verifies that the requester is logged in, but fails to require any nonce or other proof of intent. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.13 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 189841.
IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237210.
IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Server 11.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186324.
IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.13 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 189840.
LimeSurvey version 3.0.0-beta.3+17110 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Boxes that can result in CSRF admins to delete boxes. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 3.6.x.
IBM DataPower Gateway 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.16 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 192737.
The Registration Forms WordPress plugin before 3.8.1.3 does not have authorisation and CSRF when deleting users via an init action handler, allowing unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary users (along with their posts)
The WP-Pro-Quiz WordPress plugin through 0.37 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting a quiz, which could allow an attacker to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary quiz on the blog
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the stickynote module before 7.x-1.1 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that delete stickynotes via unspecified vectors.
BloofoxCMS 0.5.2.1 allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via 'mode=settings&page=editor', as demonstrated by use of 'mode=settings&page=editor' to change any file content (Locally/Remotely).
The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF check when regenerating secrets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins regenerate the secret of an arbitrary client given they know the client ID
Prospecta Master Data Online (MDO) allows CSRF.
The WP Affiliate Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on various functions including the affiliates_menu method. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete affiliate records, via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Becustom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.5.2. This is due to missing nonce validation when saving the plugin's settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings like betheme_url_slug, replaced_theme_author, and betheme_label to name a few, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
In CiviCRM before 5.28.1 and CiviCRM ESR before 5.27.5 ESR, the CKEditor configuration form allows CSRF.
A vulnerability was found in sah-comp bienlein and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is d7836a4f2b241e4745ede194f0f6fb47199cab6b. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-216473 was assigned to this vulnerability.
A vulnerability was found in easyii CMS. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/sign/out. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
The Delete All Comments Easily WordPress plugin through 1.3 is lacking Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) checks, which could result in an unauthenticated attacker making a logged in admin delete all comments from the blog.
Snare for Linux before 1.7.0 has CSRF in the web interface.
In Moodle 2.x and 3.x, a CSRF attack is possible that allows attackers to change the "number of courses displayed in the course overview block" configuration setting.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BlocksWP Theme Builder For Elementor allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Theme Builder For Elementor: from n/a through 1.2.3.
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Tenda AC18 15.03.05.05. Affected is the function fromSysToolReboot of the file /goform/SysToolReboot. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-257058 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
In waimai Super Cms 20150505, there is a CSRF vulnerability that can change the configuration via admin.php?m=Config&a=add.
e107 2.1.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery in plugin-installing, meta-changing, and settings-changing. A malicious web page can use forged requests to make e107 download and install a plug-in provided by the attacker.
CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.2.16 with the value[#][*] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed.
CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 with the nav-social[#] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in phpList 2.10.13 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create a list or (2) insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-0748. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in php/partie_administrateur/administration.php in WebJaxe 1.02 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify passwords or (2) add new projects. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Forms/PortForwarding_Edit_1 on the ZyXEL O2 DSL Router Classic allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the PortRule_Name parameter.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration screen in wp-relatedposts.php in the WP Related Posts plugin 1.0 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) wp_relatedposts_title, (2) wp_relatedposts_num, or (3) wp_relatedposts_type parameter.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in news/admin.php in N-13 News 3.4, 3.7, and 4.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new users via the options action. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Systems Insight Manager (SIM) before 6.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.2.16 with the value parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Colophon can be changed.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.15 allows attackers to delete arbitrary pages.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Citrix Presentation Server 4.0 and 4.5, MetaFrame Presentation Server 3.0, and Access Essentials 1.0 through 2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary published applications, and possibly other programs, as authenticated users via the InitialProgram key in an ICA connection. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the JMX Console in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP09 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that deploy WAR files.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in application/modules/admin/controllers/users.php in Tomaz Muraus Open Blog 1.2.1, and possibly earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests to admin/users/edit that grant administrative privileges.
The kiwi-logo-carousel plugin before 1.7.2 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/edit.php?post_type=kwlogos&page=kwlogos_settings tab or tab_flags_order parameter.
The eshop plugin through 6.3.13 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/admin.php?page=eshop-downloads.php title parameter.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in user/user-set.do in Pacific Timesheet 6.74 build 363 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create a new administrator via a new_admin action.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the apache2-slms package in SUSE Lifecycle Management Server (SLMS) 1.0 on SUSE Linux Enterprise (SLE) 11 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors related to improper parameter quoting. NOTE: some sources report that this is a vulnerability in a product named "Apache SLMS," but that is incorrect.