DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.

The Contact Form 7 Captcha WordPress plugin before 0.0.9 does not have any CSRF check in place when saving its settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in user with the manage_options change them. Furthermore, the settings are not escaped when output in attributes, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue.

Due to the lack of sanitization and lack of nonce protection on the custom CSS feature, an attacker could craft a request to inject malicious JavaScript on a site using the Contact Form 7 Style WordPress plugin through 3.1.9. If an attacker successfully tricked a site’s administrator into clicking a link or attachment, then the request could be sent and the CSS settings would be successfully updated to include malicious JavaScript.

The Formidable Form Builder WordPress plugin before 4.09.05 allows to inject certain HTML Tags like <audio>,<video>,<img>,<a> and<button>.This could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to exploit a HTML-injection byinjecting a malicous link. The HTML-injection may trick authenticated users to follow the link. If the Link gets clicked, Javascript code can be executed. The vulnerability is due to insufficient sanitization of the "data-frmverify" tag for links in the web-based entry inspection page of affected systems. A successful exploitation incomibantion with CSRF could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected system with the privileges of the user. These actions include stealing the users account by changing their password or allowing attackers to submit their own code through an authenticated user resulting in Remote Code Execution. If an authenticated user who is able to edit Wordpress PHP Code in any kind, clicks the malicious link, PHP code can be edited.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WooCommerce AutomateWoo plugin <= 5.7.5 versions.

Pulse Connect Secure 8.3R1 has CSRF in diag.cgi. In the panel, the diag.cgi file is responsible for running commands such as ping, ping6, traceroute, traceroute6, nslookup, arp, and Portprobe. These functions do not have any protections against CSRF. That can allow an attacker to run these commands against any IP if they can get an admin to visit their malicious CSRF page.

The AMP for WP – Accelerated Mobile Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.99.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'proxy' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send the logged in user's cookies to their own server via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Scripts Organizer WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have capability and CSRF checks in the saveScript AJAX action, available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users, and does not validate user input in any way, which could allow unauthenticated users to put arbitrary PHP code in a file

IBM Emptoris Strategic Supply Management Platform 10.0.0.x through 10.1.1.x is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 120657.

The Fileviewer WordPress plugin through 2.2 does not have CSRF checks in place when performing actions such as upload and delete files. As a result, attackers could make a logged in administrator delete and upload arbitrary files via a CSRF attack

The Core component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO iProcess Workspace (Browser) contains a vulnerability that theoretically allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to execute a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack on the affected system. A successful attack using this vulnerability requires human interaction from an authenticated user other than the attacker. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO iProcess Workspace (Browser): versions 11.6.0 and below.

tianti v2.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /user/ajax/save. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary operations via a crafted GET or POST request.

A Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Webmin 1.973 through the File Manager feature.

The Crypto plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.15. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'crypto_connect_ajax_process::check' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any existing user on the site, such as an administrator via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saad Iqbal Quick Contact Form quick-contact-form allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Quick Contact Form: from n/a through <= 8.2.5.

The del_reistered_domains AJAX action of the Software License Manager WordPress plugin before 4.5.1 does not have any CSRF checks, and is vulnerable to a CSRF attack

The WordPress Simple Ecommerce Shopping Cart Plugin- Sell products through Paypal plugin through 2.2.5 does not check for the uploaded Downloadable Digital product file, allowing any file, such as PHP to be uploaded by an administrator. Furthermore, as there is no CSRF in place, attackers could also make a logged admin upload a malicious PHP file, which would lead to RCE

The Perfect Survey WordPress plugin before 1.5.2 does not have proper authorisation nor CSRF checks in the save_global_setting AJAX action, allowing unauthenticated users to edit surveys and modify settings. Given the lack of sanitisation and escaping in the settings, this could also lead to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue which will be executed in the context of a user viewing any survey

The Blue Admin WordPress plugin through 21.06.01 does not sanitise or escape its "Logo Title" setting before outputting in a page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. Furthermore, the plugin does not have CSRF check in place when saving its settings, allowing the issue to be exploited via a CSRF attack.

A vulnerability was found that the 3scale dev portal does not employ mechanisms for protection against login CSRF. An attacker could use this flaw to access unauthorized information or conduct further attacks.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in PHPJabbers Appointment Scheduler 2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the i18n[1][name] parameter in a pjActionCreate action to the pjAdminServices controller or (2) add an administrator via a pjActionCreate action to the pjAdminUsers controller.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in kubiq PDF Thumbnail Generator pdf-thumbnail-generator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PDF Thumbnail Generator: from n/a through <= 1.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in vcita Online Booking & Scheduling Calendar for WordPress by vcita meeting-scheduler-by-vcita allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Online Booking & Scheduling Calendar for WordPress by vcita: from n/a through <= 4.5.5.

services/system_io/actionprocessor/System.rails in ConnectWise Manage 2017.5 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), as demonstrated by changing an e-mail address setting.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Chartify chart-builder allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Chartify: from n/a through <= 3.6.3.

nopCommerce 4.90.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Schedule Tasks functionality.

The BA Book Everything plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.20. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the my_account_update() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update a user's account details via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This can be leveraged to reset a user's password and gain access to their account.

Certain switch models from PLANET Technology have a web application that is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An unauthenticated remote attacker can trick a user into visiting a malicious website, allowing the attacker to impersonate the user and perform actions on their behalf, such as creating accounts.

The Contact Form by Supsystic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.7.24. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute AJAX actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists in cgi-bin/ConfigSet on Axesstel MU553S MU55XS-V1.14 devices.

This affects all versions of package sqlite-web. The SQL dashboard area allows sensitive actions to be performed without validating that the request originated from the application. This could enable an attacker to trick a user into performing these actions unknowingly through a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack.

An issue was discovered in JTBC(PHP) 3.0.1.7. aboutus/manage.php?type=action&action=add allows CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in E-Publish 5.x before 5.x-1.1 and 6.x before 6.x-1.0 beta1, a Drupal module, allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as other users via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Podlove Podlove Podcast Publisher plugin <= 3.8.3 versions.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPCS - WordPress Currency Switcher 1.1.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DAP-1360 with firmware 2.5.4 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that change the (1) Enable Wireless, (2) MBSSID, (3) BSSID, (4) Hide Access Point, (5) SSID, (6) Country, (7) Channel, (8) Wireless mode, or (9) Max Associated Clients setting via a crafted request to index.cgi.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the /admin/admin.inc.php component of EasyImages 2.0 v2.8.6 and below allows attackers to escalate privileges to Administrator via user interaction with a malicious web page.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Nuke ET 3.2 and 3.4 allow remote attackers to perform actions as administrators, as demonstrated by inserting an XSS sequence into a document.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alexander Fuchs PHP Everywhere plugin <= 2.0.2 versions.

Jenkins versions 2.56 and earlier as well as 2.46.1 LTS and earlier are vulnerable to an issue in the Jenkins user database authentication realm: create an account if signup is enabled; or create an account if the victim is an administrator, possibly deleting the existing default admin user in the process and allowing a wide variety of impacts.

The PropertyHive plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'save_account_details' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to edit the name, email address, and password of an administrator account via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The File Manager Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'mk_file_folder_manager' ajax action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in SourceCodester Tracking Monitoring Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /ajax.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-273339.

A vulnerability in the web-based interface allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger actions on an affected system on behalf of another user (CSRF - Cross Site Request Forgery). This requires the victim to be tricked into clicking a malicious link or opening a malicious website while being logged in into the camera.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists on Linksys EA4500 devices with Firmware Version before 2.1.41.164606, as demonstrated by a request to apply.cgi to disable SIP.

A race condition during Jenkins 2.94 and earlier; 2.89.1 and earlier startup could result in the wrong order of execution of commands during initialization. There is a very short window of time after startup during which Jenkins may no longer show the 'Please wait while Jenkins is getting ready to work' message but Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection may not yet be effective.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeFusion Fusion Builder.This issue affects Fusion Builder: from n/a through 3.11.1.

A vulnerability was found in OSWAPP Warehouse Inventory System 1.0/2.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /change_password.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-273553 was assigned to this vulnerability.

A vulnerability in open-webui/open-webui versions <= 0.3.8 allows remote code execution by non-admin users via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The application uses cookies with the SameSite attribute set to lax for authentication and lacks CSRF tokens. This allows an attacker to craft a malicious HTML that, when accessed by a victim, can modify the Python code of an existing pipeline and execute arbitrary code with the victim's privileges.

BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.2, 13.1.x before 13.1.4.1, and all versions of 12.1.x and 11.6.x and all versions of BIG-IQ 8.x, 7.x, and 6.x are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks through iControl SOAP. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.