A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Bosch PRAESIDEO until and including version 4.41 and Bosch PRAESENSA until and including version 1.10 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger actions on an affected system on behalf of another user (Cross-Site Request Forgery). This requires the victim to be tricked into clicking a malicious link or submitting a malicious form. A successful exploit allows the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privileges of the victim, e.g. creating and modifying user accounts, changing system configuration settings and cause DoS conditions. Note: For Bosch PRAESIDEO 4.31 and newer and Bosch PRAESENSA in all versions, the confidentiality impact is considered low because user credentials are not shown in the web interface.

This vulnerability could allow an attacker to hijack a session while a user is logged in the configuration web page. This vulnerability was discovered by a security researcher in B426 and found during internal product tests in B426-CN/B429-CN, and B426-M and has been fixed already starting from version 3.08 on, which was released on June 2019.

When using http protocol, the user password is transmitted as a clear text parameter for which it is possible to be obtained by an attacker through a MITM attack. This will be fixed starting from Firmware version 3.11.5, which will be released on the 30th of June, 2021.

A potential improper access control vulnerability exists in the JSON-RPC interface of the Bosch Smart Home Controller (SHC) before 9.8.905 that may result in reading or modification of the SHC's configuration or triggering and restoring backups. In order to exploit the vulnerability, the adversary needs to have successfully paired an app or service, which requires user interaction.

A potential incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability exists in the 3rd party pairing mechanism of the Bosch Smart Home Controller (SHC) before 9.8.907 that may result in a restricted app obtaining default app permissions. In order to exploit the vulnerability, the adversary needs to have successfully paired an app, which requires user interaction.

The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files on the file system via a crafted URL or HTTP request through a victim’s session.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BoldGrid Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid – Visual Drag and Drop Editor plugin <= 1.24.1 versions.

The wp-rollback plugin before 1.2.3 for WordPress has CSRF.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Guanzhou Tozed Kangwei Intelligent Technology ZLTS10G software version S10G_3.11.6 allows attackers to takeover user accounts via sending a crafted POST request to /goform/goform_set_cmd_process.

The facebook-for-woocommerce plugin before 1.9.14 for WordPress has CSRF.

The one-click-ssl plugin before 1.4.7 for WordPress has CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/admin_options.php in VR GPub 4.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins for requests that add admin accounts via an add action.

The File Manager Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'mk_file_folder_manager' ajax action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mike Martel WP Tiles plugin <= 1.1.2 versions.

An issue was discovered in JIZHI CMS 1.9.4. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add an admin account via index, /admin.php/Admin/adminadd.html

The BA Book Everything plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.20. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the my_account_update() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update a user's account details via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This can be leveraged to reset a user's password and gain access to their account.

The users-ultra plugin before 1.5.63 for WordPress has CSRF via action=package_add_new to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php.

usersettings.php in e107 through 2.3.0 lacks a certain e_TOKEN protection mechanism.

joyplus-cms 1.6.0 has admin_ajax.php?action=savexml&tab=vodplay CSRF.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the DVS Custom Notification plugin 1.0.1 and earlier for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change application settings or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

The visitors-traffic-real-time-statistics plugin before 1.13 for WordPress has CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Vladimir Prelovac Smart YouTube PRO plugin <= 4.3 versions.

Certain switch models from PLANET Technology have a web application that is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An unauthenticated remote attacker can trick a user into visiting a malicious website, allowing the attacker to impersonate the user and perform actions on their behalf, such as creating accounts.

The cp-contact-form-with-paypal (aka CP Contact Form with PayPal) plugin before 1.1.6 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS, related to cp_contactformpp.php and cp_contactformpp_admin_int_list.inc.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin panel in Django 0.96 allows remote attackers to change passwords of arbitrary users via a request to admin/auth/user/1/password/. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by Debian, since product documentation includes a recommendation for a CSRF protection module that is included with the product. However, CVE considers this an issue because the default configuration does not use this module

Various Vembu products allow an attacker to execute a (non-blind) http-only Cross Site Request Forgery (Other products or versions of products in this family may be affected too.)

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Car Driving School Management System 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function save_users of the file admin/user/index.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Studio Wombat Shoppable Images plugin <= 1.2.3 versions.

A remote unauthenticated cross-site request forgery (csrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba AirWave Management Platform version(s): Prior to 8.2.12.0. A vulnerability in the AirWave web-based management interface could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a CSRF attack against a vulnerable system. A successful exploit would consist of an attacker persuading an authorized user to follow a malicious link, resulting in arbitrary actions being carried out with the privilege level of the targeted user.

An issue was discovered in MDaemon before 20.0.4. Remote Administration allows an attacker to perform a fixation of the anti-CSRF token. In order to exploit this issue, the user has to click on a malicious URL provided by the attacker and successfully authenticate into the application. Having the value of the anti-CSRF token, the attacker may trick the user into visiting his malicious page and performing any request with the privileges of attacked user.

A vulnerability was found in OSWAPP Warehouse Inventory System 1.0/2.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file /edit_account.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-273552.

Umbraco before 7.4.0 allows remote attackers to bypass anti-forgery security measures and conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks as demonstrated by editing user account information in the templates.asmx.cs file.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pixelgrade PixTypes plugin <= 1.4.14 versions.

Edimax Wi-Fi Extender devices allow goform/formwlencryptvxd CSRF with resultant PSK key disclosure.

A vulnerability in open-webui/open-webui versions <= 0.3.8 allows remote code execution by non-admin users via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The application uses cookies with the SameSite attribute set to lax for authentication and lacks CSRF tokens. This allows an attacker to craft a malicious HTML that, when accessed by a victim, can modify the Python code of an existing pipeline and execute arbitrary code with the victim's privileges.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Miro Mannino Flickr Justified Gallery plugin <= 3.5 versions.

The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12 and 1.24.x before 1.24.5 does not perform token comparison in constant time before returning, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8624.

The MainWP Child Reports plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the network_options_action() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This is only exploitable on multisite instances.

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Medicine Tracker System 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /classes/Users.php?f=save_user of the component Password Change Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-272806 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sumo Social Share Boost plugin <= 4.5 versions.

A vulnerability was found in OSWAPP Warehouse Inventory System 1.0/2.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /change_password.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-273553 was assigned to this vulnerability.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in a connection test form method in Jenkins Maven Release Plugin 0.16.1 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins connect to an attacker specified web server and parse XML documents.

The Stream plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the network_options_action() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can lead to DoS or privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Build Failure Analyzer Plugin 1.24.1 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins evaluate a computationally expensive regular expression.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BoLiQuan WP Clean Up plugin <= 1.2.3 versions.

Textpattern CMS 4.6.2 allows CSRF via the prefs subsystem.

Xovis PC2, PC2R, and PC3 devices through 3.6.0 allow CSRF.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in LetoDMS (formerly MyDMS) before 3.3.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in GiveWP GiveWP – Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform plugin <= 2.25.1 versions.

The request phase of the OmniAuth Ruby gem (1.9.1 and earlier) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery when used as part of the Ruby on Rails framework, allowing accounts to be connected without user intent, user interaction, or feedback to the user. This permits a secondary account to be able to sign into the web application as the primary account.