An issue was discovered in Logitech Options. The OAuth 2.0 state parameter was not properly validated. This leaves applications vulnerable to CSRF attacks during authentication and authorization operations.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Chef Sinatra Plugin 1.20 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins send an HTTP request to an attacker-controlled URL and have it parse an XML response.
An issue was discovered in the PageLayer plugin before 1.1.2 for WordPress. The pagelayer_settings_page function is vulnerable to CSRF, which can lead to XSS.
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FlyCms 1.0 allows attackers to add arbitrary administrator accounts via system/admin/admin_save.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LayerSlider plugin <= 7.7.9 versions.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Users module in Zikula before 1.2.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change account privileges via an edit access_permissions action to index.php.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in adduser.do in Symantec LiveUpdate Administrator (LUA) before 2.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts, and possibly have unspecified other impact, via the userRole parameter.
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects GS716Tv3 before 6.3.1.36 and GS724Tv4 before 6.3.1.36.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Perfmatters allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Perfmatters: from n/a through 2.1.6.
An issue was discovered in the PushToWatch extension for MediaWiki through 1.35.1. The primary form did not implement an anti-CSRF token and therefore was completely vulnerable to CSRF attacks against onSkinAddFooterLinks in PushToWatch.php.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SWAMP Plugin 1.2.6 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified web server using attacker-specified credentials.
The ultimate-category-excluder plugin before 1.2 for WordPress allows ultimate-category-excluder.php CSRF.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saint Systems Disable User Login.This issue affects Disable User Login: from n/a through 1.3.7.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Snow Commander Plugin 1.10 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified webserver using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Transmission 1.5 before 1.53 and 1.6 before 1.61 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
phpMyAdmin 4.8.0 before 4.8.0-1 has CSRF, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL statements, related to js/db_operations.js, js/tbl_operations.js, libraries/classes/Operations.php, and sql.php.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins autonomiq Plugin 1.15 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL server using attacker-specified credentials.
An issue was discovered in the XCloner Backup and Restore plugin before 4.2.153 for WordPress. It allows CSRF (via almost any endpoint).
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) issue in the NextGEN Gallery plugin before 3.5.0 for WordPress allows File Upload and Local File Inclusion via settings modification, leading to Remote Code Execution and XSS. (It is possible to bypass CSRF protection by simply not including a nonce parameter.)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Thrive Themes Thrive Theme Builder < 3.24.2 versions.
Missing Authorization, Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AWeber AWeber – Free Sign Up Form and Landing Page Builder Plugin for Lead Generation and Email Newsletter Growth allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs, Cross-Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AWeber – Free Sign Up Form and Landing Page Builder Plugin for Lead Generation and Email Newsletter Growth: from n/a through 7.3.9.
The Security/changepassword URL action in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.10 and 2.4.x before 2.4.4 passes a token as a GET parameter while changing a password through email, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive data and hijack the session via the HTTP referer logs on a server, aka "HTTP referer leakage."
FreshDNS version 1.0.3 and earlier contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in All (authenticated) API calls in index.php / class.manager.php that can result in Editing domains and zones with victim's privileges. This attack appear to be exploitable via Victim must open a website containing attacker's javascript. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.0.5 and later.
A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X304-2FE, SCALANCE X306-1LD FE, SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X320-1 FE, SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FE, SCALANCE X408-2, SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front), SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2. The integrated web server of the affected device could allow remote attackers to perform actions with the permissions of a victim user, provided the victim user has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request.
A vulnerability in the Cisco Firepower Chassis Manager (FCM) of Cisco FXOS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against a user of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the FCM interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a targeted user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary requests that could take unauthorized actions on behalf of the targeted user.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in BEdita before 3.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create categories via a data array to news/saveCategories or (2) modify credentials via a data array to admin/saveUser.
An issue was discovered in Joomla! 2.5.0 through 3.9.22. A missing token check in the emailexport feature of com_privacy causes a CSRF vulnerability.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting Delete Marker Category, Delete Map, and Copy Map functions in WP Google Map plugin (versions <= 4.2.3).
In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admin/ajax.attachment.php and admin/att.main.php.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Code Snippets Pro Code Snippets.This issue affects Code Snippets: from n/a through 3.5.0.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Swashata WP Category Post List Widget.This issue affects WP Category Post List Widget: from n/a through 2.0.3.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in calendar.class.php in ApPHP Calendar (ApPHP CAL) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that use the (1) category_name, (2) category_description, (3) event_name, or (4) event_description parameter.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Power Manager (HPPM) 4.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText ECM (formerly Livelink ECM) 9.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change folder and resource permissions.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in admin/update_user in Hulihan Amethyst 0.1.5, and possibly earlier, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrative password or (2) change the site's configuration.
The Stockists Manager for Woocommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the stockist_settings_main() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The site-offline plugin before 1.4.4 for WordPress lacks certain wp_create_nonce and wp_verify_nonce calls, aka CSRF.
NPR Visuals Team Pym.js version versions 0.4.2 up to 1.3.1 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pym.js _onNavigateToMessage function. https://github.com/nprapps/pym.js/blob/master/src/pym.js#L573 that can result in Arbitrary javascript code execution. This attack appear to be exploitable via Attacker gains full javascript access to pages with Pym.js embeds when user visits an attacker crafted page.. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in versions 1.3.2 and later.
A vulnerability exists in CakePHP versions 4.0.x through 4.1.3. The CsrfProtectionMiddleware component allows method override parameters to bypass CSRF checks by changing the HTTP request method to an arbitrary string that is not in the list of request methods that CakePHP checks. Additionally, the route middleware does not verify that this overriden method (which can be an arbitrary string) is actually an HTTP method.
The uContext for Amazon plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including 3.9.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ~/app/sites/ajax/actions/keyword_save.php file that is called via the doAjax() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Batavi before 1.0 has CSRF.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VaM Shop 1.6, 1.6.1, and probably earlier versions allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change user status via admin/customers.php or (2) change user permissions via admin/accounting.php. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WebberZone Top 10 – WordPress Popular posts by WebberZone plugin <= 3.3.2 versions.
The console in Togglz before 2.9.4 allows CSRF.
JFrog Artifactory version since 5.11 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in UI rest endpoints that can result in Classic CSRF attack allowing an attacker to perform actions as logged in user. This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim must run maliciously crafted flash component. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 6.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in web GUI of Secomea GateManager allows an attacker to execute malicious code. This issue affects: Secomea GateManager All versions prior to 9.4.
OpenAsset Digital Asset Management (DAM) through 12.0.19 does not correctly verify whether a request made to the application was intentionally made by the user, allowing for cross-site request forgery attacks on all user functions.
Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.9 and 2.4.x before 2.4.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via destructive controller actions, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-5087.
In FileCloud before 21.3, file upload is not protected against Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).