The WC Vendors – WooCommerce Multivendor, WooCommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the /vendor_dashboard/product/delete/ endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete vendor products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Image Optimizer by wps.sk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the imagopby_ajax_optimize_gallery() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger bulk optimization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Teradek Cube 7.3.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change administrative passwords without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to submit password change requests to the device's system configuration interface.

A security flaw has been discovered in JhumanJ OpnForm up to 1.9.3. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor has stated that API calls require authentication through Authorization Bearer Tokens, so classic CSRF attacks do not apply here. An attacker would need to possess the JWT through means such as XSS which were mitigated, disabling any form of initial access.

An XSS combined with CSRF vulnerability discovered in SalesAgility SuiteCRM 7.x before 7.8.24 and 7.10.x before 7.10.11 leads to cookie stealing, aka session hijacking. This issue affects the "add dashboard pages" feature where users can receive a malicious attack through a phished URL, with script executed.

SAP Fiori 1.0 for SAP ERP HCM (Approve Leave Request, version 2) application allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user to send unintended request to the web server. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protection.

DrayTek routers before 2018-05-23 allow CSRF attacks to change DNS or DHCP settings, a related issue to CVE-2017-11649.

The WP Edit Menu WordPress plugin before 1.5.0 does not have authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, which could allow unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts/pages from the blog

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins XPath Configuration Viewer Plugin 1.1.1 and earlier allows attackers to create and delete XPath expressions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Failed Job Deactivator Plugin 1.2.1 and earlier allows attackers to disable jobs.

The Posts Navigation Links for Sections and Headings – Free by WP Masters plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'wpm_navigation_links_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

SRCMS 3.0.0 allows CSRF via admin.php?m=Admin&c=gifts&a=update to change goods prices with the super administrator's privileges.

An issue was discovered on Systrome ISG-600C, ISG-600H, and ISG-800W 1.1-R2.1_TRUNK-20180914.bin devices. There is CSRF via /ui/?g=obj_keywords_add and /ui/?g=obj_keywords_addsave with resultant XSS because of a lack of csrf token validation.

iSmartgate PRO 1.5.9 is vulnerable to CSRF that allows remote attackers to open/close a specified garage door/gate via /isg/opendoor.php.

The vulnerability have been reported to affect earlier versions of Helpdesk. If exploited, this cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability could allow attackers to force NAS users to execute unintentional actions through a web application. QNAP has already fixed the issue in Helpdesk 3.0.3 and later.

The Ultimate Viral Quiz plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on thesave_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Currency allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Currency: from 0.0.0 before 3.5.0.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Mindskip xzs-mysql 学之思开源考试系统 3.9.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Multiple endpoints are affected. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

JEECMS 9.3 has CSRF via the api/admin/content/save URI to add news.

The PayPal Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the form creation and management functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new PayPal forms and modify PayPal payment settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

wg7.php in Webgalamb 7.0 lacks security measures to prevent CSRF attacks, as demonstrated by wg7.php?options=1 to change the administrator password.

The Comment Info Detector plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the options.php file when handling form submissions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The System Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.20. This is due to missing nonce validation on the sd_toggle_logs() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to toggle critical logging settings including Page Access Logs, Error Logs, and Email Delivery Logs via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 5.x before 5.8 and 6.x before 6.3 allows remote attackers to perform administrative actions via vectors involving deletion of "translated strings."

The PixelYourSite – Your smart PIXEL (TAG) & API Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 11.1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the adminEnableGdprAjax() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify GDPR settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The FunKItools plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the saveFields() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Delta Electronics DIAEnergie Version 1.7.5 and prior is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery, which may allow an attacker to cause a user to carry out an action unintentionally.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 6.x before 6.3 allows remote attackers to perform administrative actions via vectors involving deletion of OpenID identities.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Blackboard Academic Suite 8.0.260.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of student users for requests that change configuration and enrollments via unspecified input to (1) update_module.jsp, (2) enroll_course.pl, and (3) unenroll.jsp.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Matrix Reloaded Plugin 1.1.3 and earlier allows attackers to rebuild previous matrix builds.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stiofan UsersWP userswp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects UsersWP: from n/a through <= 1.2.53.

A weakness has been identified in givanz Vvveb up to 1.0.7.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Executing manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. Once again the project maintainer reacted very professional: "I accept the existence of these vulnerabilities. (...) I fixed the code to remove these vulnerabilities and will push the code to github and make a new release."

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Sigmize sigmize allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Sigmize: from n/a through <= 0.0.9.

The Course Redirects for Learndash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.4. This is due to missing nonce validation when processing form submissions on the settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Shenzhen Tenda W30E V2 firmware versions up to and including V16.01.0.19(5037) lack cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections on administrative endpoints, including those used to change administrator account credentials. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious requests that, when triggered by an authenticated user’s browser, modify administrative passwords and other configuration settings.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paolo GeoDirectory allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects GeoDirectory: from n/a before 2.8.150.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themelooks Enter Addons enteraddons allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Enter Addons: from n/a through <= 2.3.2.

A CSRF issue was found in OpenShift Enterprise 1.2. The web console is using 'Basic authentication' and the REST API has no CSRF attack protection mechanism. This can allow an attacker to obtain the credential and the Authorization: header when requesting the REST API via web browser.

The Easy Email Subscription plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the show_editsub_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary subscribers via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Internationalization (i18n) Drupal module 5.x before 5.x-2.3 and 5.x-1.1, and 6.x before 6.x-1.0 beta 1, allows remote attackers to change node translation relationships via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Copyscape Copyscape Premium copyscape-premium allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Copyscape Premium: from n/a through <= 1.4.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in magepeopleteam WpEvently mage-eventpress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WpEvently: from n/a through <= 5.1.1.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in cPanel, possibly 11.18.3 and 11.19.3, allow remote attackers to (1) execute arbitrary code via the command1 parameter to frontend/x2/cron/editcronsimple.html, and perform various administrative actions via (2) frontend/x2/sql/adddb.html, (3) frontend/x2/sql/adduser.html, and (4) frontend/x2/ftp/doaddftp.html.

Interaction error between Adobe Flash and multiple Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) services allow remote attackers to perform Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) style attacks by using the Flash navigateToURL function to send a SOAP message to a UPnP control point, as demonstrated by changing the primary DNS server.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in John James Jacoby WP Term Order wp-term-order allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Term Order: from n/a through <= 2.1.0.

The Theme Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation when processing form submissions in the theme-importer.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger arbitrary file downloads and potentially execute malicious operations via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Widgets for Google Reviews plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 10.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation within setup_no_reg_header.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset plugin settings and remove reviews via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Ninja Forms – The Contact Form Builder That Grows With You plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.12.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when exporting CSV files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete those files granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The TopBar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the fme_nb_topbar_save_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in service/impl/UserLocalServiceImpl.java in Liferay Portal 4.3.6 allows remote attackers to perform unspecified actions as unspecified authenticated users via the User-Agent HTTP header, which is used when composing Forgot Password e-mail messages in HTML format.