In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) for modifying a glossary.

better_errors is an open source replacement for the standard Rails error page with more information rich error pages. It is also usable outside of Rails in any Rack app as Rack middleware. better_errors prior to 2.8.0 did not implement CSRF protection for its internal requests. It also did not enforce the correct "Content-Type" header for these requests, which allowed a cross-origin "simple request" to be made without CORS protection. These together left an application with better_errors enabled open to cross-origin attacks. As a developer tool, better_errors documentation strongly recommends addition only to the `development` bundle group, so this vulnerability should only affect development environments. Please ensure that your project limits better_errors to the `development` group (or the non-Rails equivalent). Starting with release 2.8.x, CSRF protection is enforced. It is recommended that you upgrade to the latest release, or minimally to "~> 2.8.3". There are no known workarounds to mitigate the risk of using older releases of better_errors.

The Java component in SAP CRM has CSRF. This is SAP Security Note 2478964.

An issue was discovered in BINOM3 Universal Multifunctional Electric Power Quality Meter. There is no CSRF Token generated per page and/or per (sensitive) function. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can allow silent execution of unauthorized actions on the device such as configuration parameter changes, and saving modified configuration.

The Easy Registration Forms WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation via the ajax_add_form function found in the ~/includes/class-form.php file which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 2.1.1.

geminabox (aka Gem in a Box) before 0.13.7 has CSRF, as demonstrated by an unintended gem upload.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that perform arbitrary Unified CM operations, aka Bug ID CSCui13033.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/admin_options.php in VR GPub 4.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins for requests that add admin accounts via an add action.

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.1.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 209399.

GLPI is a free Asset and IT management software package. In versions prior to 9.5.6, a user who is logged in to GLPI can bypass Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection in many places. This could allow a malicious actor to perform many actions on GLPI. This issue is fixed in version 9.5.6. There are no workarounds aside from upgrading.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the ShareThis plugin before 7.0.6 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify this plugin's settings.

Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 is vulnerable to some CSRF attacks.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the persona_xsrf_token function in persona.module in the Mozilla Persona module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.11 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of aribitrary users via a security token that is not a string data type.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the HMS Testimonials plugin before 2.0.11 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add new testimonials via the hms-testimonials-addnew page, (2) add new groups via the hms-testimonials-addnewgroup page, (3) change default settings via the hms-testimonials-settings page, (4) change advanced settings via the hms-testimonials-settings-advanced page, (5) change custom fields settings via the hms-testimonials-settings-fields page, or (6) change template settings via the hms-testimonials-templates-new page to wp-admin/admin.php.

NetApp SnapCenter Server versions 1.1 through 2.x are susceptible to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which could be used to cause an unintended authenticated action in the user interface.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office before 8.1.6 and 9.x before 9.3.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change mobile passwords, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2305.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Sharebar plugin 1.2.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) modify buttons, or (3) insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences.

firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

snipe-it is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Related Posts by Zemanta plugin before 1.3.2 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that change settings via unknown vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Loftek Nexus 543 IP Camera allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that change (1) passwords or (2) firewall configuration, as demonstrated by a request to set_users.cgi.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/setting.php in the Xhanch - My Twitter plugin before 2.7.7 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change unspecified settings.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in saveProperties.html in Corporater EPM Suite allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change passwords.

The kento-post-view-counter plugin through 2.8 for WordPress has wp-admin/admin.php?page=kentopvc_settings CSRF.

phoronix-test-suite is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco Linksys WRT110 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Kasseler CMS before 2 r1232 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct SQL injection attacks via the (1) groups[] parameter in a send action in the sendmail module or (2) query parameter in a sql_query action in the database module to admin.php, related to CVE-2013-3727.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Coursemill Learning Management System (LMS) 6.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via vectors related to cookies.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in IBM Cognos Command Center before 10.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) start or (2) stop services.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Noma component in GroundWork Monitor Enterprise 6.7.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that (1) store XSS sequences or (2) delete entries.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework on Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance (WSA) devices, Email Security Appliance (ESA) devices, and Content Security Management Appliance (SMA) devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCuh70263, CSCuh70323, and CSCuh26634.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the qTranslate plugin 2.5.34 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change plugin settings via unspecified vectors.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability exists in Filebrowser < 2.18.0 that allows attackers to create a backdoor user with admin privilege and get access to the filesystem via a malicious HTML webpage that is sent to the victim. An admin can run commands using the FileBrowser and hence it leads to RCE.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eZOE flash player in eZ Publish 4.1 through 4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

BlackBerry Link before 1.2.1.31 on Windows and before 1.1.1 build 39 on Mac OS X does not require authentication for remote file-access folders, which allows remote attackers to read or create arbitrary files via IPv6 WebDAV requests, as demonstrated by a CSRF attack involving DNS rebinding.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WordPress Related Posts plugin before 2.6.2 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that change settings via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in goform/usermanage in Grandstream GXV3501, GXV3504, GXV3601, GXV3601HD/LL, GXV3611HD/LL, GXV3615W/P, GXV3651FHD, GXV3662HD, GXV3615WP_HD, GXV3500, and possibly other camera models allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that add users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in he Digg Digg plugin before 5.3.5 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that modify settings via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the options admin page in the WP-PostViews plugin before 1.63 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change plugin settings via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the XML Pack in IBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.5.x through 8.5 FP3, 8.7.x through 8.7 FP2, and 9.1.x through 9.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in KiteCMS V1.1 allows attackers to arbitrarily add an administrator account.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apply.cgi in Linksys WRT310Nv2 2.0.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change passwords and modify remote management ports.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the underConstruction plugin before 1.09 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that deactivate a plugin via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Administrative console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.47, 7.0 before 7.0.0.31, 8.0 before 8.0.0.7, and 8.5 before 8.5.5.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Dropdown Menu Widget plugin 1.9.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cgi-bin/system_setting.exe in Belkin F5D8236-4 v2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that open the remote management interface on arbitrary ports via the remote_mgmt_enabled and remote_mgmt_port parameters.

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WordPress uListing plugin (versions <= 2.0.5) as it lacks CSRF checks on plugin administration pages.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in util_system.html in Belkin N900 router allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change configuration settings including passwords and remote management ports.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Gitea before 1.5.2 via API routes.This can be dangerous especially with state altering POST requests.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in action.php in Leed (Light Feed), possibly before 1.5 Stable, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for unspecified requests, related to the lack of an anti-CSRF token.