The Linux Foundation ONOS 2.0.0 and earlier is affected by: Poor Input-validation. The impact is: A network administrator (or attacker) can install unintended flow rules in the switch by mistake. The component is: createFlow() and createFlows() functions in FlowWebResource.java (RESTful service). The attack vector is: network management and connectivity.

The frontend component in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.6.3-rev31, 7.8.x before 7.8.2-rev31, 7.8.3 before 7.8.3-rev41, and 7.8.4 before 7.8.4-rev20 allows remote attackers to spoof the origin of e-mails via unicode characters in the "personal part" of a (1) From or (2) Sender address.

An issue was discovered in Steve Pallen Coherence before 0.5.2 that is similar to a Mass Assignment vulnerability. In particular, "registration" endpoints (e.g., creating, editing, updating) allow users to update any coherence_fields data. For example, users can automatically confirm their accounts by sending the confirmed_at parameter with their registration request.

In WordPress before 4.9.9 and 5.x before 5.0.1, authors could bypass intended restrictions on post types via crafted input.

A vulnerability in the web-based UI of Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to overwrite files on the file system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a specific UI input field to provide a custom path location. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to overwrite files on the file system.

ZNC before 1.7.1-rc1 does not properly validate untrusted lines coming from the network, allowing a non-admin user to escalate his privilege and inject rogue values into znc.conf.

PHP Scripts Mall Naukri / Shine / Jobsite Clone Script 3.0.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (page update outage) via crafted PHP and JavaScript code in the "Current Position" field.

Vulnerability allows a user of Apache Oozie 3.1.3-incubating to 5.0.0 to impersonate other users. The malicious user can construct an XML that results workflows running in other user's name.

A flaw was found in RPC request using gfs3_rename_req in glusterfs server. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw to write to a destination outside the gluster volume.

Pivotal Operations Manager, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.6 and version 2.0.14, includes NGINX packages that lacks security vulnerability patches. An attacker with access to the NGINX processes and knowledge of how to exploit the unpatched vulnerabilities may be able to impact Operations Manager

An issue was discovered in com_fields in Joomla! Core before 3.8.8. Inadequate filtering allows users authorised to create custom fields to manipulate the filtering options and inject an unvalidated option.

An issue was discovered in Moodle 3.x. By substituting URLs in portfolios, users can instantiate any class. This can also be exploited by users who are logged in as guests to create a DDoS attack.

LibreHealthIO lh-ehr version REL-2.0.0 contains a Authenticated Unrestricted File Deletion vulnerability in Import template that can result in Denial of service. This attack appear to be exploitable via User controlled parameter.

A arbitrary file write vulnerability exists in Jenkins Fortify CloudScan Plugin 1.5.1 and earlier in ArchiveUtil.java that allows attackers able to control rulepack zip file contents to overwrite any file on the Jenkins master file system, only limited by the permissions of the user the Jenkins master process is running as.

delete.php in Prozilla Top 100 1.2 allows remote authenticated users to delete statistics and accounts of arbitrary users via a modified s parameter.

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning Software (prior to Release 11.1) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to delete any file from an affected system. The vulnerability exists because the affected software does not perform proper input validation of HTTP requests and fails to apply role-based access controls (RBACs) to requested HTTP URLs. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request that uses directory traversal techniques to submit a path to a desired file location on an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to delete any file from the system. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc99618.

A vulnerability in the UpgradeManager of the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning Tool 12.1 could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to write arbitrary files as root on the system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by triggering the upgrade package installation functionality. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc90304.

A vulnerability in the batch provisioning feature in Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning Tool could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to overwrite system files as root. The vulnerability is due to lack of input validation of the parameters in BatchFileName and Directory. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the parameters of the batch action file function. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvd61766.

A vulnerability in the Cisco application-hosting framework (CAF) component of the Cisco IOx application environment could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to write or modify arbitrary files in the virtual instance running on the affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of user-supplied application packages. An attacker who can upload a malicious package within Cisco IOx could exploit the vulnerability to modify arbitrary files. The impacts of a successful exploit are limited to the scope of the virtual instance and do not impact the router that is hosting Cisco IOx. Cisco IOx Releases 1.0.0.0 and 1.1.0.0 are vulnerable. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuy52317.

A number of unused delete routes are present in CloudForms before 5.7.2.1 which can be accessed via GET requests instead of just POST requests. This could allow an attacker to bypass the protect_from_forgery XSRF protection causing the routes to be used. This attack would require additional cross-site scripting or similar attacks in order to execute.

cPanel before 62.0.17 allows arbitrary file-overwrite operations via the WHM Zone Template editor (SEC-226).

The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages when the protocol is implemented. An authenticated remote attacker could send a malicious message to a target system. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to tamper with business and make the system abnormal. Affected Huawei Products are: DP300 versions V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00B012, V500R002C00B013, V500R002C00B014, V500R002C00B017, V500R002C00B018, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC400, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00; RP200 versions V500R002C00SPC200, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE30 versions V100R001C10SPC300, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700B010, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE40 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE50 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE60 versions V100R001C10, V100R001C10B001, V100R001C10B002, V100R001C10B010, V100R001C10B011, V100R001C10B012, V100R001C10B013, V100R001C10B014, V100R001C10B016, V100R001C10B017, V100R001C10B018, V100R001C10B019, V100R001C10SPC400, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700, V100R001C10SPC800B011, V100R001C10SPC900, V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00, V500R002C00SPCb00, V500R002C00SPCd00, V500R002C00SPCe00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC100, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; eSpace U1981 version V200R003C20SPC900.

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to create arbitrary files on vulnerable installations of NetGain Systems Enterprise Manager 7.2.730 build 1034. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the org.apache.jsp.u.jsp.db.save_005fimage_jsp servlet, which listens on TCP port 8081 by default. When parsing the id parameter, the process does not properly validate user-supplied data, which can allow for the upload of files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of Administrator. Was ZDI-CAN-5117.

The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages when the protocol is implemented. An authenticated remote attacker could send a malicious message to a target system. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to tamper with business and make the system abnormal. Affected Huawei Products are: DP300 versions V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00B012, V500R002C00B013, V500R002C00B014, V500R002C00B017, V500R002C00B018, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC400, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00; RP200 versions V500R002C00SPC200, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE30 versions V100R001C10SPC300, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700B010, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE40 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE50 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE60 versions V100R001C10, V100R001C10B001, V100R001C10B002, V100R001C10B010, V100R001C10B011, V100R001C10B012, V100R001C10B013, V100R001C10B014, V100R001C10B016, V100R001C10B017, V100R001C10B018, V100R001C10B019, V100R001C10SPC400, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700, V100R001C10SPC800B011, V100R001C10SPC900, V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00, V500R002C00SPCb00, V500R002C00SPCd00, V500R002C00SPCe00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC100, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; eSpace U1981 version V200R003C20SPC900.

The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages when the protocol is implemented. An authenticated remote attacker could send a malicious message to a target system. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to tamper with business and make the system abnormal. Affected Huawei Products are: DP300 versions V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00B012, V500R002C00B013, V500R002C00B014, V500R002C00B017, V500R002C00B018, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC400, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00; RP200 versions V500R002C00SPC200, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE30 versions V100R001C10SPC300, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700B010, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE40 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE50 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE60 versions V100R001C10, V100R001C10B001, V100R001C10B002, V100R001C10B010, V100R001C10B011, V100R001C10B012, V100R001C10B013, V100R001C10B014, V100R001C10B016, V100R001C10B017, V100R001C10B018, V100R001C10B019, V100R001C10SPC400, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700, V100R001C10SPC800B011, V100R001C10SPC900, V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00, V500R002C00SPCb00, V500R002C00SPCd00, V500R002C00SPCe00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC100, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; eSpace U1981 version V200R003C20SPC900.

The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages when the protocol is implemented. An authenticated remote attacker could send a malicious message to a target system. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to tamper with business and make the system abnormal. Affected Huawei Products are: DP300 versions V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00B012, V500R002C00B013, V500R002C00B014, V500R002C00B017, V500R002C00B018, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC400, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00; RP200 versions V500R002C00SPC200, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE30 versions V100R001C10SPC300, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700B010, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC500, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE40 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE50 versions V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPCb00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; TE60 versions V100R001C10, V100R001C10B001, V100R001C10B002, V100R001C10B010, V100R001C10B011, V100R001C10B012, V100R001C10B013, V100R001C10B014, V100R001C10B016, V100R001C10B017, V100R001C10B018, V100R001C10B019, V100R001C10SPC400, V100R001C10SPC500, V100R001C10SPC600, V100R001C10SPC700, V100R001C10SPC800B011, V100R001C10SPC900, V500R002C00, V500R002C00B010, V500R002C00B011, V500R002C00SPC100, V500R002C00SPC200, V500R002C00SPC300, V500R002C00SPC600, V500R002C00SPC700, V500R002C00SPC800, V500R002C00SPC900, V500R002C00SPCa00, V500R002C00SPCb00, V500R002C00SPCd00, V500R002C00SPCe00, V600R006C00, V600R006C00SPC100, V600R006C00SPC200, V600R006C00SPC300, V600R006C00SPC400, V600R006C00SPC500; eSpace U1981 version V200R003C20SPC900.

plugins/system/remember/remember.php in Joomla! 2.5.x before 2.5.10 and 3.0.x before 3.0.4 does not properly handle an object obtained by unserializing a cookie, which allows remote authenticated users to conduct PHP object injection attacks and cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors.

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.3.0 through 7.3.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper input validation. IBM X-Force ID: 174201.

A vulnerability in the REST API of Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to overwrite certain files that should be restricted on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient authorization enforcement on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a file using the REST API. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to overwrite and upload files, which could degrade the functionality of the affected system.

Pivotal Apps Manager included in Pivotal Application Service, versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.1 and 2.1.x prior to 2.1.8 and 2.0.x prior to 2.0.17 and 1.12.x prior to 1.12.26, does not escape all user-provided content when sending invitation emails. A malicious authenticated user can inject content into an invite to another user, exploiting the trust implied by the source of the email.