The cp-contact-form-with-paypal (aka CP Contact Form with PayPal) plugin before 1.1.6 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS, related to cp_contactformpp.php and cp_contactformpp_admin_int_list.inc.php.

The Appointment Booking Calendar plugin before 1.3.35 for WordPress allows user input (in fields such as Description or Name) in any booking form to be any formula, which then could be exported via the Bookings list tab in /wp-admin/admin.php?page=cpabc_appointments.php. The attacker could achieve remote code execution via CSV injection.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in codepeople WP Time Slots Booking Form allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Time Slots Booking Form: from n/a through 1.2.30.

The Smart Image Gallery WordPress plugin before 1.0.19 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The CP Contact Form with PayPal plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.52. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cp_contact_form_paypal_check_init_actions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add discount codes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Appointment Booking Calendar WordPress plugin before 1.3.83 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as adding a booking to the calendar without paying.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in codepeople Calculated Fields Form allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Calculated Fields Form: from n/a through 5.3.58.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in codepeople Appointment Booking Calendar allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Appointment Booking Calendar: from n/a through 1.3.92.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pixelpost 1.7.3 could allow remote attackers to change the admin password.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Invoice module 6.x-1.x before 6.x-1.2 and 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.3 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (1) create, (2) delete, or (3) alter invoices via unspecified vectors.

Mediawiki before 1.28.1 / 1.27.2 / 1.23.16 contains a flaw where the "Mark all pages visited" on the watchlist does not require a CSRF token.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook Web Access (owa/ev.owa) 2007 through SP2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of e-mail users for requests that perform Outlook requests, as demonstrated by setting the auto-forward rule.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office before 8.1.6 and 9.x before 9.3.0, Cybozu Dezie before 8.0.7, and Cybozu Mailwise before 5.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change passwords.

For Eclipse Che versions 6.16 to 7.3.0, with both authentication and TLS disabled, visiting a malicious web site could trigger the start of an arbitrary Che workspace. Che with no authentication and no TLS is not usually deployed on a public network but is often used for local installations (e.g. on personal laptops). In that case, even if the Che API is not exposed externally, some javascript running in the local browser is able to send requests to it.

Southsoft GMIS 5.0 is vulnerable to CSRF attacks. Attackers can access other users' private information such as photos through CSRF. For example: any student's photo information can be accessed through /gmis/(S([1]))/student/grgl/PotoImageShow/?bh=[2]. Among them, the code in [1] is a random string generated according to the user's login related information. It can protect the user's identity, but it can not effectively prevent unauthorized access. The code in [2] is the student number of any student. The attacker can carry out CSRF attack on the system by modifying [2] without modifying [1].

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Redback before 1.2.4, as used in Apache Archiva 1.0 through 1.0.3, 1.1 through 1.1.4, 1.2 through 1.2.2, and 1.3 through 1.3.1; and Apache Continuum 1.3.6, 1.4.0, and 1.1 through 1.2.3.1; allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify credentials.

WordPress before 5.2.4 does not properly consider type confusion during validation of the referer in the admin pages, possibly leading to CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Registration codes module before 6.x-1.6, 6.x-2.x before 6.x-2.8, and 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.2 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete role-rules via unspecified vectors.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the user interface of Fortinet FortiSIEM 5.2.5 could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to perform arbitrary actions using an authenticated user's session by persuading the victim to follow a malicious link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) 6.2.2.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative accounts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Simple Machines Forum (SMF) 2.x before 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators or moderators via vectors involving image files, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-3615. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the user, including modifying the device configuration. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading an interface user to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the user. Software versions prior to 8.3.150.0, 8.5.135.0, and 8.8.100.0 are affected.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Mail On Update plugin before 5.2.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the "List of alternative recipients" via the mailonupdate_mailto parameter in the mail-on-update page to wp-admin/options-general.php. NOTE: a third party claims that 5.2.1 and 5.2.2 are also vulnerable, but the issue might require a separate CVE identifier since this might reflect an incomplete fix.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in process_bug.cgi in Bugzilla 4.4.x before 4.4.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify bugs via vectors involving a midair-collision token.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/manager_users.class.php in SantaFox 2.02, and possibly earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests, as demonstrated by adding administrative users via the save_admin action to admin/index.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Services module 6.x-3.x and 7.x-3.x before 7.x-3.4 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Sitemagic CMS 4.4.1 is affected by a Cross-Site-Request-Forgery (CSRF) issue as it doesn't implement any method to validate incoming requests, allowing the execution of critical functionalities via spoofed requests. This behavior could be abused by a remote unauthenticated attacker to trick Sitemagic users into performing unwarranted actions.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/main/update_user in DiamondList 0.1.6, and possibly earlier, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrative password or (2) change the site's configuration.

The affiliates-manager plugin before 2.6.6 for WordPress has CSRF.

The zoho-salesiq plugin before 1.0.9 for WordPress has CSRF.

Silver Peak EdgeConnect SD-WAN before 8.1.7.x allows CSRF via JSON data to a .swf file.

The visitors-traffic-real-time-statistics plugin before 1.13 for WordPress has CSRF.

The wp-members plugin before 3.2.8 for WordPress has CSRF.

The visitors-traffic-real-time-statistics plugin before 1.12 for WordPress has CSRF in the settings page.

TuziCMS 2.0.6 has index.php/manage/link/do_add CSRF.

The facebook-by-weblizar plugin before 2.8.5 for WordPress has CSRF.

joyplus-cms 1.6.0 has admin_ajax.php?action=savexml&tab=vodplay CSRF.

In the Reponsive Menu (free and Pro) WordPress plugins before 4.0.4, attackers could craft a request and trick an administrator into uploading a zip archive containing malicious PHP files. The attacker could then access those files to achieve remote code execution and further infect the targeted site.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security AppScan Enterprise 5.6 and 8.x before 8.7 and IBM Rational Policy Tester 5.6 and 8.x before 8.5.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that cause a denial of service via malformed HTTP data.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in attachment.cgi in Bugzilla 2.x, 3.x, and 4.x before 4.2rc1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that upload attachments.

diag_command.php in pfSense 2.4.4-p3 allows CSRF via the txtCommand or txtRecallBuffer field, as demonstrated by executing OS commands. This occurs because csrf_callback() produces a "CSRF token expired" error and a Try Again button when a CSRF token is missing.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in testingLibraryAction.do in the Training Center testing library in Cisco WebEx Training Center allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete tests, aka Bug ID CSCzu81067.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins WebSphere Deployer Plugin 1.6.1 and earlier allows attackers to perform connection tests and determine whether files with an attacker-specified path exist on the Jenkins master file system.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the portlet subsystem in the administrative console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.47 and 7.0 before 7.0.0.27 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface on the Cisco Scientific Atlanta WebSTAR DPC2100R2 cable modem with firmware 2.0.2r1256-060303 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) reset the modem, (2) erase the firmware, (3) change the administrative password, (4) install modified firmware, or (5) change the access level, as demonstrated by a request to goform/_aslvl.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Software Use Analysis (SUA) application before 1.3.3 in IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager 8.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via a web site that contains crafted Flash Action Message Format (AMF) messages.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface in FreeIPA before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make configuration changes.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web-based management utility on the NEC AtermWR9500N, AtermWR8600N, AtermWR8370N, AtermWR8160N, AtermWM3600R, and AtermWM3450RN routers allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) initialize settings or (2) reboot the device.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Alauda DevOps Pipeline Plugin 2.3.2 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Cisco Unity Express with software before 8.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCue35910.