Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2018-4030

Summary
Assigner-talos
Assigner Org ID-b86d76f8-0f8a-4a96-a78d-d8abfc7fc29b
Published At-21 Mar, 2019 | 15:46
Updated At-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:04
Rejected At-
Credits

An exploitable vulnerability exists the safe browsing function of the CUJO Smart Firewall, version 7003. The bug lies in the way the safe browsing function parses HTTP requests. The "Host" header is incorrectly extracted from captured HTTP requests, which would allow an attacker to visit any malicious websites and bypass the firewall. An attacker could send an HTTP request to exploit this vulnerability.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:talos
Assigner Org ID:b86d76f8-0f8a-4a96-a78d-d8abfc7fc29b
Published At:21 Mar, 2019 | 15:46
Updated At:05 Aug, 2024 | 05:04
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

An exploitable vulnerability exists the safe browsing function of the CUJO Smart Firewall, version 7003. The bug lies in the way the safe browsing function parses HTTP requests. The "Host" header is incorrectly extracted from captured HTTP requests, which would allow an attacker to visit any malicious websites and bypass the firewall. An attacker could send an HTTP request to exploit this vulnerability.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
CUJO
Versions
Affected
  • CUJO Smart Firewall - Firmware version 7003
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/A'HTTP Request Smuggling
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: 'HTTP Request Smuggling
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.05.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Version: 3.0
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2018-0702
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2018-0702
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2018-0702
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2018-0702
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:talos-cna@cisco.com
Published At:21 Mar, 2019 | 16:29
Updated At:07 Jun, 2022 | 17:18

An exploitable vulnerability exists the safe browsing function of the CUJO Smart Firewall, version 7003. The bug lies in the way the safe browsing function parses HTTP requests. The "Host" header is incorrectly extracted from captured HTTP requests, which would allow an attacker to visit any malicious websites and bypass the firewall. An attacker could send an HTTP request to exploit this vulnerability.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Secondary3.05.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.0
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

getcujo
getcujo
>>smart_firewall>>7003
cpe:2.3:a:getcujo:smart_firewall:7003:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-444Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-444
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2018-0702talos-cna@cisco.com
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2018-0702
Source: talos-cna@cisco.com
Resource:
Exploit
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

56Records found

CVE-2022-42252
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.17%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-01 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-06 May, 2025 | 16:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Tomcat request smuggling via malformed content-length

If Apache Tomcat 8.5.0 to 8.5.82, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.67, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.26 or 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0 was configured to ignore invalid HTTP headers via setting rejectIllegalHeader to false (the default for 8.5.x only), Tomcat did not reject a request containing an invalid Content-Length header making a request smuggling attack possible if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that also failed to reject the request with the invalid header.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-tomcatApache Tomcat
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2020-7671
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 47.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jun, 2020 | 15:36
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-goliath_projectn/a
Product-goliathgoliath
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2020-7238
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 70.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 16:43
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Netty 4.1.43.Final allows HTTP Request Smuggling because it mishandles Transfer-Encoding whitespace (such as a [space]Transfer-Encoding:chunked line) and a later Content-Length header. This issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-16869.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Netty ProjectDebian GNU/LinuxFedora ProjectRed Hat, Inc.
Product-debian_linuxnettyfedorajboss_enterprise_application_platformopenshift_application_runtimes_text-only_advisoriesjboss_enterprise_application_platform_text-only_advisoriesn/a
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2024-34350
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 63.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 May, 2024 | 16:07
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 02:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Next.js Vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling

Next.js is a React framework that can provide building blocks to create web applications. Prior to 13.5.1, an inconsistent interpretation of a crafted HTTP request meant that requests are treated as both a single request, and two separate requests by Next.js, leading to desynchronized responses. This led to a response queue poisoning vulnerability in the affected Next.js versions. For a request to be exploitable, the affected route also had to be making use of the [rewrites](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/next-config-js/rewrites) feature in Next.js. The vulnerability is resolved in Next.js `13.5.1` and newer.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-vercel
Product-next.js
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2020-17509
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.59% / 80.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jan, 2021 | 09:40
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 14:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ATS negative cache option is vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack. If you have this option enabled, please upgrade or disable this feature. Apache Traffic Server versions 7.0.0 to 7.1.11 and 8.0.0 to 8.1.0 are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-traffic_serverApache Traffic Server
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2020-5207
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.00% / 0.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 19:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Request smuggling is possible in Ktor when both chunked TE and content length specified

In Ktor before 1.3.0, request smuggling is possible when running behind a proxy that doesn't handle Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding properly or doesn't handle \n as a headers separator.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ktor.ioJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-ktorKtor
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found