In the rcp client in MIT krb5-appl through 1.0.3, malicious servers could bypass intended access restrictions via the filename of . or an empty filename, similar to CVE-2018-20685 and CVE-2019-7282. The impact is modifying the permissions of the target directory on the client side. NOTE: MIT krb5-appl is not supported upstream but is shipped by a few Linux distributions. The affected code was removed from the supported MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) product many years ago, at version 1.8.

cgiemail allows remote attackers to use cgiemail as a spam proxy via CRLF injection of encoded newline (%0a) characters in parameters such as "required-subject," which can be used to modify the CC, BCC, and other header fields in the generated email message.

PAC parsing in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.19.4 and 1.20.x before 1.20.1 has integer overflows that may lead to remote code execution (in KDC, kadmind, or a GSS or Kerberos application server) on 32-bit platforms (which have a resultant heap-based buffer overflow), and cause a denial of service on other platforms. This occurs in krb5_pac_parse in lib/krb5/krb/pac.c. Heimdal before 7.7.1 has "a similar bug."

An integer overflow in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for Beauty Ecosystem Coin (BEC), the Ethereum ERC20 token used in the Beauty Chain economic system, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing two _receivers arguments in conjunction with a large _value argument, as exploited in the wild in April 2018, aka the "batchOverflow" issue.

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow to be used in all `Slot` and `Epoch` cases, so one may carefully use `BigInt` just where necessary for consensus.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for KAPcoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for EPPCOIN (EPP), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PornCoin (PRNC), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for IMM Coin (IMC), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ESTSToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DoccoinPreICO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for LexitToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for LoliCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for YLCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GMile, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for loncoin (LON), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

SpadePreSale is a smart contract running on Ethereum. The mint function has an integer overflow that allows minted tokens to be arbitrarily retrieved by the contract owner.

The mintToken function of Pylon (PYLNT) aka PylonToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, a related issue to CVE-2018-11812.

The mintToken function of SwftCoin (SWFTC) aka SwftCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

An Integer overflow vulnerability exists in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for CryptoBotsBattle (CBTB), an Ethereum token. This vulnerability could be used by an attacker to create an arbitrary amount of tokens for any user.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAi (AI), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the function multipleTransfer of Neo Genesis Token (NGT), an Ethereum token smart contract. An attacker could use it to set any user's balance.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MoonToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ENTER (ENTR) (Contract Name: EnterToken), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for sumocoin (SUMO), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for NetkillerAdvancedTokenAirDrop, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CSAToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for bankcoin (BNK), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RajTest, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for FreeCoin (FREE), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ETHEREUMBLACK (ETCBK), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Robincoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Code47 (C47), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Futures Pease (FP), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for ENTER (ENTR) (Contract Name: EnterToken), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BIGCAdvancedToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CJXToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitcoinAgileToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for wellieat, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

SP8DE PreSale Token (DSPX) is a smart contract running on Ethereum. The mint function has an integer overflow that allows minted tokens to be arbitrarily retrieved by the contract owner.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for FansChainToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for sexhdsolo, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mint function of a smart contract implementation for DigitalCloudToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for CoinToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ESH, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TravelCoin (TRV), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CWS, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GalacticX, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CardFactory, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Antoken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.