The sell function of a smart contract implementation for YLCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Crowdnext (CNX), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ViteMoneyCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for JiucaiToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DMPToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for ENTER (ENTR) (Contract Name: EnterCoin), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Mimicoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BIGCAdvancedToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GFC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CryptonitexCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

An integer overflow in the _transfer function of a smart contract implementation for Hexagon (HXG), an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a _to argument in conjunction with a large _value argument, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the "burnOverflow" issue.

The mint function of a smart contract implementation for Link Platform (LNK), an Ethereum ERC20 token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for FuturXe, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ipshoots, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

Bitotal (TFUND) is a smart contract running on Ethereum. The mintTokens function has an integer overflow that allows minted tokens to be arbitrarily retrieved by the contract owner.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BiquToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Betcash (BC), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

go-jose before 1.0.5 suffers from a CBC-HMAC integer overflow on 32-bit architectures. An integer overflow could lead to authentication bypass for CBC-HMAC encrypted ciphertexts on 32-bit architectures.

An integer overflow in the unprotected distributeToken function of a smart contract implementation for EETHER (EETHER), an Ethereum ERC20 token, will lead to an unauthorized increase of an attacker's digital assets.

An integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Doftcoin Token, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to cause unexpected financial losses.

An integer overflow in the transfer function of a smart contract implementation for Lancer Token, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to cause unexpected financial losses between two large accounts during a transaction.

The transfer and transferFrom functions of a smart contract implementation for ChuCunLingAIGO (CCLAG), an Ethereum token, have an integer overflow. NOTE: this has been disputed by a third party.

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow to be used in all `Slot` and `Epoch` cases, so one may carefully use `BigInt` just where necessary for consensus.

Integer overflow in the NTP daemon (NTPd) before 4.0 causes the NTP server to return the wrong date/time offset when a client requests a date/time that is more than 34 years away from the server's time.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAi (AI), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

An Integer overflow vulnerability exists in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for CryptoBotsBattle (CBTB), an Ethereum token. This vulnerability could be used by an attacker to create an arbitrary amount of tokens for any user.

The mintToken function of SwftCoin (SWFTC) aka SwftCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of Nexxus (NXX) aka NexxusToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of Pylon (PYLNT) aka PylonToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, a related issue to CVE-2018-11812.

An issue was discovered in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) through 1.16. There is a variable "dbentry->n_key_data" in kadmin/dbutil/dump.c that can store 16-bit data but unknowingly the developer has assigned a "u4" variable to it, which is for 32-bit data. An attacker can use this vulnerability to affect other artifacts of the database as we know that a Kerberos database dump file contains trusted data.

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the function batchTransfer of WeMediaChain (WMC), an Ethereum token smart contract. An attacker could use it to set any user's balance.

The mintTokens function of a smart contract implementation for SunContract, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow via the _amount variable.

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the function multipleTransfer of Neo Genesis Token (NGT), an Ethereum token smart contract. An attacker could use it to set any user's balance.

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the function batchTransfer of SHARKTECH (SKT), an Ethereum token smart contract. An attacker could use it to set any user's balance.

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the function transferAny of Malaysia coins (Xmc), an Ethereum token smart contract. An attacker could use it to set any user's balance.

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the function transfer_tokens_after_ICO of GlobeCoin (GLB), an Ethereum token smart contract. An attacker could use it to set any user's balance.

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the function distribute of MP3 Coin (MP3), an Ethereum token smart contract. An attacker could use it to set any user's balance.

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for MyBO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for SIPCOIN, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DeWeiSecurityServiceToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CAPTOZ, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Flow, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MVGcoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Nectar (NCTR), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ZIBToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CSAToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Jitech (JTH), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ElevateCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for EthereumSmart, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mint function of a smart contract implementation for MiningToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.