A vulnerability was found in all versions of Keycloak where, the pages on the Admin Console area of the application are completely missing general HTTP security headers in HTTP-responses. This does not directly lead to a security issue, yet it might aid attackers in their efforts to exploit other problems. The flaws unnecessarily make the servers more prone to Clickjacking, channel downgrade attacks and other similar client-based attack vectors.

The processInvocation function in org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.AuthorizationInterceptor in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) before 6.0.1, authorizes all requests when no roles are allowed for an Enterprise Java Beans (EJB) method invocation, which allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions for EJB methods.

The SecurityAssociation.getCredential method in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 returns the credentials of the previous user when a security context is not provided, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges as other users.

RubyGems before 1.8.23 can redirect HTTPS connections to HTTP, which makes it easier for remote attackers to observe or modify a gem during installation via a man-in-the-middle attack.

In ectd before versions 3.4.10 and 3.3.23, gateway TLS authentication is only applied to endpoints detected in DNS SRV records. When starting a gateway, TLS authentication will only be attempted on endpoints identified in DNS SRV records for a given domain, which occurs in the discoverEndpoints function. No authentication is performed against endpoints provided in the --endpoints flag. This has been fixed in versions 3.4.10 and 3.3.23 with improved documentation and deprecation of the functionality.

Red Hat JBoss Operations Network (JON) before 2.4.2 and 3.0.x before 3.0.1 does not check the JON agent key, which allows remote attackers to spoof the identity of arbitrary agents via the registered agent name.

Red Hat JBoss Operations Network (JON) before 2.4.2 and 3.0.x before 3.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack agent sessions via an agent registration request without a security token.

Open redirect vulnerability in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform before 5.2.0 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the initialURI parameter.

It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12151 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6.

A flaw was found in the way samba client before samba 4.4.16, samba 4.5.14 and samba 4.6.8 used encryption with the max protocol set as SMB3. The connection could lose the requirement for signing and encrypting to any DFS redirects, allowing an attacker to read or alter the contents of the connection via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface for cumin in Red Hat Enterprise MRG Grid 2.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of cumin users for unspecified requests.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ManageIQ Enterprise Virtualization Manager (EVM) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management console (openshift-console/app/controllers/application_controller.rb) in OpenShift 0.0.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the GateIn Portal component in JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 5.2.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Cumin before 0.1.5444, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Messaging, Realtime, and Grid (MRG) 2.0, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute commands via unspecified vectors.

A flaw was found in the /oauth/token/request custom endpoint of the OpenShift OAuth server allowing for XSS generation of CLI tokens due to missing X-Frame-Options and CSRF protections. If not otherwise prevented, a separate XSS vulnerability via JavaScript could further allow for the extraction of these tokens.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the JMX Console in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP09 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that deploy WAR files.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Spacewalk Java site packages (aka spacewalk-java) 1.2.39 in Spacewalk, as used in the server in Red Hat Network Satellite 5.3.0 through 5.4.1 and other products, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (1) disable the current user account, (2) add user accounts, or (3) modify user accounts to have administrator privileges.

A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt.

A CSRF issue was found in JBoss Application Server 7 before 7.1.0. JBoss did not properly restrict access to the management console information (for example via the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" HTTP access control flag). This can lead to unauthorized information leak if a user with admin privileges visits a specially-crafted web page provided by a remote attacker.

It was found that Keycloak's account console, up to 6.0.1, did not perform adequate header checks in some requests. An attacker could use this flaw to trick an authenticated user into performing operations via request from an untrusted domain.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins Git Plugin 3.9.1 and earlier in src/main/java/hudson/plugins/git/GitTagAction.java that allows attackers to create a Git tag in a workspace and attach corresponding metadata to a build record.

A flaw was found in Quay. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks force a user to perform unwanted actions in an application. During the pentest, it was detected that the config-editor page is vulnerable to CSRF. The config-editor page is used to configure the Quay instance. By coercing the victim’s browser into sending an attacker-controlled request from another domain, it is possible to reconfigure the Quay instance (including adding users with admin privileges).

A vulnerability was found that the 3scale dev portal does not employ mechanisms for protection against login CSRF. An attacker could use this flaw to access unauthorized information or conduct further attacks.

The dashbuilder in Red Hat JBoss BPM Suite 6.3.2 does not properly handle CSRF tokens generated during an active session and includes them in query strings, which makes easier for remote attackers to (1) bypass CSRF protection mechanisms or (2) conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by obtaining an old token.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Red Hat JBoss BRMS and BPMS 6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that modify instances via a crafted web page.

NPAPI plugins, such as Adobe Flash, can send non-simple cross-origin requests, bypassing CORS by making a same-origin POST that does a 307 redirect to the target site. This allows for a malicious site to engage in cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 60, Thunderbird < 52.9, Firefox ESR < 60.1, Firefox ESR < 52.9, and Firefox < 61.

A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe (can't PUT from an HTML form or such) but POST allows creating in-order keys that an attacker can send.

A flaw was found in Jolokia versions from 1.2 to before 1.6.1. Affected versions are vulnerable to a system-wide CSRF. This holds true for properly configured instances with strict checking for origin and referrer headers. This could result in a Remote Code Execution attack.

Ansible Tower before versions 3.1.8 and 3.2.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in awx/api/authentication.py. An attacker could exploit this by tricking already authenticated users into visiting a malicious site and hijacking the authtoken cookie.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pcsd web UI in pcs before 0.9.149.

Jenkins 2.191 and earlier, LTS 2.176.2 and earlier allowed users to obtain CSRF tokens without an associated web session ID, resulting in CSRF tokens that did not expire and could be used to bypass CSRF protection for the anonymous user.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that have unspecified impact via vectors related to the HTTP GET method.

A data modification vulnerability exists in Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugins 1.10.1 and earlier in blueocean-core-js/src/js/bundleStartup.js, blueocean-core-js/src/js/fetch.ts, blueocean-core-js/src/js/i18n/i18n.js, blueocean-core-js/src/js/urlconfig.js, blueocean-rest/src/main/java/io/jenkins/blueocean/rest/APICrumbExclusion.java, blueocean-web/src/main/java/io/jenkins/blueocean/BlueOceanUI.java, blueocean-web/src/main/resources/io/jenkins/blueocean/BlueOceanUI/index.jelly that allows attackers to bypass all cross-site request forgery protection in Blue Ocean API.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the jolokia API in A-MQ.

A flaw was found in Infinispan version 10, where it is possible to perform various actions that could have side effects using GET requests. This flaw allows an attacker to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack.

Versions of Foreman as shipped with Red Hat Satellite 6 does not check for a correct CSRF token in the logout action. Therefore, an attacker can log out a user by having them view specially crafted content.

JBoss KeyCloak is vulnerable to soft token deletion via CSRF

CFME: CSRF protection vulnerability via permissive check of the referrer header

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin terminal in Hawt.io allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that run commands on the Karaf server, as demonstrated by running "shutdown -f."

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in oVirt Engine before 3.5.0 beta2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that perform unspecified actions via a REST API request.

CloudForms 3.0 Management Engine before 5.2.1.6 allows remote attackers to bypass the Ruby on Rails protect_from_forgery mechanism and conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a destructive action in a request.

katello-headpin is vulnerable to CSRF in REST API

This release fixes a Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability was found in Red Hat CloudForms which forces end users to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which the user is currently authenticated. An attacker can make a forgery HTTP request to the server by crafting custom flash file which can force the user to perform state changing requests like provisioning VMs, running ansible playbooks and so forth.

It was found that the AMQ Online console is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is exploitable in cases where preflight checks are not instigated or bypassed. For example authorised users using an older browser with Adobe Flash are vulnerable when targeted by an attacker. This flaw affects all versions of AMQ-Online prior to 1.5.2 and Enmasse versions 0.31.0-rc1 up until but not including 0.32.2.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface in FreeIPA before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make configuration changes.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the JMX Console (jmx-console) in JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform before 5.2.2, BRMS Platform 5.3.0 before roll up patch1, and SOA Platform 5.3.0 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that perform operations on MBeans and possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

A vulnerability was found in keycloak in the way that the OIDC logout endpoint does not have CSRF protection. Versions shipped with Red Hat Fuse 7, Red Hat Single Sign-on 7, and Red Hat Openshift Application Runtimes are believed to be vulnerable.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Web Console (web-console) in Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform before 6.4.4 and WildFly (formerly JBoss Application Server) before 2.0.0.CR9 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make arbitrary changes to an instance via vectors involving a file upload using a multipart/form-data submission.

Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 uses a publicly accessible salt to generate CSRF protection tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism via a brute force attack.