The /plugins/servlet/gadgets/makeRequest resource in Jira before version 8.7.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal network resources via a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a logic bug in the JiraWhitelist class.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Rebuild v2.8.3 allows attackers to obtain the real IP address and scan Intranet information via the fileurl parameter.
The unoconv package before 0.9 mishandles untrusted pathnames, leading to SSRF and local file inclusion.
A security vulnerability exists in the Zingbox Inspector versions 1.294 and earlier, that can allow an attacker to easily identify instances of Zingbox Inspectors in a local area network.
CSZCMS v1.3.0 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which can be leveraged to leak sensitive data via a local file inclusion at /admin/filemanager/connector/.
In Mendix 7.23.5 and earlier, issue in XML import mappings allow DOCTYPE declarations in the XML input that is potentially unsafe.
stangirard/quivr version 0.0.236 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The application does not provide sufficient controls when crawling a website, allowing an attacker to access applications on the local network. This vulnerability could allow a malicious user to gain access to internal servers, the AWS metadata endpoint, and capture Supabase data.
Server side request forgery (SSRF) in phpBB before 3.2.6 allows checking for the existence of files and services on the local network of the host through the remote avatar upload function.
In Gogs 0.11.53, an attacker can use migrate to send arbitrary HTTP GET requests, leading to SSRF.
A remote unauthenticated attacker can abuse a web service in SAP NetWeaver Application Server for Java (Administrator System Overview), versions 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, by sending a specially crafted XML file and trick the application server into leaking authentication credentials for its own SAP Management console, resulting in Server-Side Request Forgery.
GroupViewProxyServlet in RoomWizard before 4.4.x allows SSRF via the url parameter.
The copy function in application/admin/controller/Article.php in NoneCms 1.3.0 allows remote attackers to access the content of internal and external network resources via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), because URL validation only considers whether the URL contains the "csdn" substring.
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 and 6.3 have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.4 and earlier have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the gradio-app/gradio version 4.21.0, specifically within the `/queue/join` endpoint and the `save_url_to_cache` function. The vulnerability arises when the `path` value, obtained from the user and expected to be a URL, is used to make an HTTP request without sufficient validation checks. This flaw allows an attacker to send crafted requests that could lead to unauthorized access to the local network or the AWS metadata endpoint, thereby compromising the security of internal servers.
The Omni Commerce Connect API (OCC) of SAP Hybris Commerce, versions 6.*, is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. This is due to a misconfiguration of XML parser that is used in the server-side implementation of OCC.
Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP Central Management Console, BI Launchpad and Fiori BI Launchpad, 4.10, from 4.20, from 4.30, could allow a malicious user to use common techniques to determine which ports are in use on the backend server.
With this SSRF vulnerability, an attacker can reach internal addresses to make a request as the server and read it's contents. This attack can lead to leak of sensitive information.
The Dundas BI server before 5.0.1.1010 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attack, allowing an attacker to forge arbitrary requests (with certain restrictions) that will be executed on behalf of the attacker, via the viewUrl parameter of the "export the dashboard as an image" feature. This could be leveraged to provide a proxy to attack other servers (internal or external) or to perform network scans of external or internal networks.
An SSRF issue was discovered in tecrail Responsive FileManager 9.13.4 via the upload.php url parameter. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-15495.
An SSRF vulnerability was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS 7.0.11 because the remote function in app/spider/spider_tools.class.php does not block DNS hostnames associated with private and reserved IP addresses, as demonstrated by 127.0.0.1 in an A record. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14858.
An SSRF vulnerability in webhooks in Gitea through 1.5.0-rc2 and Gogs through 0.11.53 allows remote attackers to access intranet services.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.5.
SSRF on /proxy in GitHub repository jgraph/drawio prior to 18.0.4. An attacker can make a request as the server and read its contents. This can lead to a leak of sensitive information.
An SSRF vulnerability was discovered in idreamsoft iCMS before V7.0.11 because the remote function in app/spider/spider_tools.class.php does not block private and reserved IP addresses such as 10.0.0.0/8. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14514.
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.4 and earlier have a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository transloadit/uppy prior to 3.3.1.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack in FUXA 1.1.3 can be carried out leading to the obtaining of sensitive information from the server's internal environment and services, often potentially leading to the attacker executing commands on the server.
Ligeo Archives Ligeo Basics as of 02_01-2022 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to read any documents via the download features.
Sentinel 1.8.2 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
Zoho ManageEngine SupportCenter Plus before 11016 is vulnerable to an SSRF attack in ActionExecutor.
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve a cleartext password. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg71040.
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve a cleartext password from an affected system. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg71044.
GeoServer through 2.18.5 and 2.19.x through 2.19.2 allows SSRF via the option for setting a proxy host.
In Gradle Enterprise before 2021.1.3, an attacker with the ability to perform SSRF attacks can potentially discover credentials for other resources.
The AppCheck research team identified a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the DNN CMS platform, formerly known as DotNetNuke. SSRF vulnerabilities allow the attacker to exploit the target system to make network requests on their behalf, allowing a range of possible attacks. In the most common scenario, the attacker exploits SSRF vulnerabilities to attack systems behind the firewall and access sensitive information from Cloud Provider metadata services.
There is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in HUAWEI P40 versions 10.1.0.118(C00E116R3P3). This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of parameters while dealing with some messages. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain access to certain resource which the attacker are supposed not to do.
Server Side Request Forgery in Apache Solr, versions 1.3 until 7.6 (inclusive). Since the "shards" parameter does not have a corresponding whitelist mechanism, a remote attacker with access to the server could make Solr perform an HTTP GET request to any reachable URL.
Plone though 5.2.4 allows SSRF via the lxml parser. This affects Diazo themes, Dexterity TTW schemas, and modeleditors in plone.app.theming, plone.app.dexterity, and plone.supermodel.
SSRF exists in Webmin 1.850 via the PATH_INFO to tunnel/link.cgi, as demonstrated by a GET request for tunnel/link.cgi/http://INTRANET-IP:8000.
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a sweep.
Concrete CMS (formerly concrete5) versions 8.5.6 and below and version 9.0.0 allow local IP importing causing the system to be vulnerable toa. SSRF attacks on the private LAN servers by reading files from the local LAN. An attacker can pivot in the private LAN and exploit local network appsandb. SSRF Mitigation Bypass through DNS RebindingConcrete CMS security team gave this a CVSS score of 3.5 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:NConcrete CMS is maintaining Concrete version 8.5.x until 1 May 2022 for security fixes.This CVE is shared with HackerOne Reports https://hackerone.com/reports/1364797 and https://hackerone.com/reports/1360016Reporters: Adrian Tiron from FORTBRIDGE (https://www.fortbridge.co.uk/ ) and Bipul Jaiswal
The package @isomorphic-git/cors-proxy before 2.7.1 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to missing sanitization and validation of the redirection action in middleware.js.
The LikeBtn WordPress Like Button Rating ♥ LikeBtn WordPress plugin before 2.6.32 was vulnerable to Unauthenticated Full-Read Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the lunary-ai/lunary application, specifically within the endpoint '/auth/saml/tto/download-idp-xml'. The vulnerability arises due to the application's failure to validate user-supplied URLs before using them in server-side requests. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted request to the affected endpoint, allowing them to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This could lead to the disclosure of sensitive information, service disruption, or further attacks against the network infrastructure. The issue affects the latest version of the application as of the report.
An SSRF issue was discovered in OpenStack Glance before Newton. The 'copy_from' feature in the Image Service API v1 allowed an attacker to perform masked network port scans. With v1, it is possible to create images with a URL such as 'http://localhost:22'. This could then allow an attacker to enumerate internal network details while appearing masked, since the scan would appear to originate from the Glance Image service.
JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.8873 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Workflow component.
The ECT Provider component in OutSystems Platform Server 10 before 10.0.1104.0 and 11 before 11.9.0 (and LifeTime management console before 11.7.0) allows SSRF for arbitrary outbound HTTP requests.
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro OfficeScan XG SP1 and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a specific sweep.
SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Services) versions - 410, 420, 430, allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject arbitrary values as CMS parameters to perform lookups on the internal network which is otherwise not accessible externally. On successful exploitation, attacker can scan internal network to determine internal infrastructure and gather information for further attacks like remote file inclusion, retrieve server files, bypass firewall and force the vulnerable server to perform malicious requests, resulting in a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability.