An issue was discovered in OpenWrt 18.06.0 to 18.06.6 and 19.07.0, and LEDE 17.01.0 to 17.01.7. A bug in the fork of the opkg package manager before 2020-01-25 prevents correct parsing of embedded checksums in the signed repository index, allowing a man-in-the-middle attacker to inject arbitrary package payloads (which are installed without verification).

gotortc is a camera streaming application. Versions 1.8.5 and prior are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery. The `/api/config` endpoint allows one to modify the existing configuration with user-supplied values. While the API is only allowing localhost to interact without authentication, an attacker may be able to achieve that depending on how go2rtc is set up on the upstream application, and given that this endpoint is not protected against CSRF, it allows requests from any origin (e.g. a "drive-by" attack) . The `exec` handler allows for any stream to execute arbitrary commands. An attacker may add a custom stream through `api/config`, which may lead to arbitrary command execution. In the event of a victim visiting the server in question, their browser will execute the requests against the go2rtc instance. Commit 8793c3636493c5efdda08f3b5ed5c6e1ea594fd9 adds a warning about secure API access.

Cross-Site request forgery in Checkmk < 2.3.0p8, < 2.2.0p29, < 2.1.0p45, and <= 2.0.0p39 (EOL) could lead to 1-click compromize of the site.

CSRF exists on Peplink Balance 305, 380, 580, 710, 1350, and 2500 devices with firmware before fw-b305hw2_380hw6_580hw2_710hw3_1350hw2_2500-7.0.1-build2093. The CGI scripts in the administrative interface are affected. This allows an attacker to execute commands, if a logged in user visits a malicious website. This can for example be used to change the credentials of the administrative webinterface.

Trendnet AC2600 TEW-827DRU version 2.08B01 does not properly implement csrf protections. Most pages lack proper usage of CSRF protections or mitigations. Additionally, pages that do make use of CSRF tokens are trivially bypassable as the server does not appear to validate them properly (i.e. re-using an old token or finding the token thru some other method is possible).

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /dede/mychannel_edit.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Atmail Webmail Server before 7.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add user accounts, (2) modify user accounts, (3) delete user accounts, or (4) stop the product's service.

Tweetbot 1.3.3 for Mac, and 2.8.5 for iPad and iPhone, does not require confirmation of (1) follow or (2) favorite actions, which allows remote attackers to automatically force the user to perform undesired actions, as demonstrated via the tweetbot:///follow/ URL.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /dede/diy_edit.php

IBM Security Verify Information Queue 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aterm WG2600HP firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier, and Aterm WG2600HP2 firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

The administration web interface for the Arris Surfboard SB8200 lacks any protections against cross-site request forgery attacks. This means that an attacker could make configuration changes (such as changing the administrative password) without the consent of the user.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Siemens WinCC (TIA Portal) 11 and 12 before 12 SP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims by leveraging improper configuration of SIMATIC HMI panels by the WinCC product.

IBM Sterling File Gateway 2.2.0.0 through 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 197790.

Racom's MIDGE Firmware 4.4.40.105 contains an issue that allows for cross-site request forgeries.

inc/central.class.php in GLPI before 0.84.2 does not attempt to make install/install.php unavailable after an installation is completed, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, and (1) perform a SQL injection via an Etape_4 action or (2) execute arbitrary PHP code via an update_1 action.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/article_add.php

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the TEQneers SEO Enhancements (tq_seo) extension before 5.0.1 for TYPO3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Draytek VigorConnect 1.6.0-B3 lacks cross-site request forgery protections and does not sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Name Directory 1.17.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Sharetronix 3.1.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change configuration settings or (2) create new administrative users via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Click2Sell Suite module 6.x-1.x for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete database information via vectors involving the Drupal Form API.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/module_main.php

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Puppet Enterprise (PE) before 3.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that deleting a (1) report, (2) group, or (3) class or possibly have other unspecified impact.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/admin/modules/users/update.php in BigTree CMS 4.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify arbitrary user accounts via an edit user action.

Stupid Simple CMS v1.2.4 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /update-article.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities [CWE-352] in FortiAIOps version 2.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform arbitrary actions on behalf of an authenticated user via tricking the victim to execute malicious GET requests.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cart66Product.php in the Cart66 Lite plugin before 1.5.1.15 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create or modify products or conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (2) Product name or (3) Price description field in a product save action via a request to wp-admin/admin.php.

Google Chrome before 29 sends HTTP Cookie headers without first validating that they have the required character-set restrictions, which allows remote attackers to conduct the equivalent of a persistent Logout CSRF attack via a crafted parameter that forces a web application to set a malformed cookie within an HTTP response.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in index.php in Digital Signage Xibo 1.4.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a new administrator via the AddUser action or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, as demonstrated by CVE-2013-4888.

An issue was discovered in the pricing-table-by-supsystic plugin before 1.8.2 for WordPress. It allows CSRF.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in OpenX 2.8.11 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete (1) users via admin/agency-user-unlink.php, (2) advertisers via admin/advertiser-delete.php, (3) banners via admin/banner-delete.php, (4) campaigns via admin/campaign-delete.php, (5) channels via admin/channel-delete.php, (6) affiliate websites via admin/affiliate-delete.php, or (7) zones via admin/zone-delete.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x before 10.1 FP8 through 11.0 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.0 and 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

ICE Hrm 26.2.0 is vulnerable to CSRF that leads to password reset via service.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Leithold DSGVO All in one for WP.This issue affects DSGVO All in one for WP: from n/a through 4.3.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/admin/modules/users/create.php in BigTree CMS 4.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create an administrative user via an add user action to index.php.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/catalog_del.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DSL-2740B Gateway with firmware EU_1.00 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable or disable Wireless MAC Address Filters via a wlFltMode action to wlmacflt.cmd, (2) enable or disable firewall protections via a request to scdmz.cmd, or (3) enable or disable remote management via a save action to scsrvcntr.cmd.

LexisNexis Firco Compliance Link 3.7 allows CSRF.

A CSRF vulnerability in the RegistrationMagic plugin through 4.6.0.3 for WordPress allows remote attackers to forge requests on behalf of a site administrator to change all settings for the plugin, including deleting users, creating new roles with escalated privileges, and allowing PHP file uploads via forms.

A CSRF protection bypass vulnerability in Trend Micro InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance 6.5 SP2 could allow an attacker to get a victim's browser to send a specifically encoded request without requiring a valid CSRF token.

CSRF in login.asp on Ruckus devices allows an attacker to access the panel, and use SSRF to perform scraping or other analysis via the SUBCA-1 field on the Wireless Admin screen.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Solution, as used in Unified MeetingPlace Web Conferencing and Unified MeetingPlace, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCui45209 and CSCui44674.

An issue was discovered in tools/pass-change/result.php in phpIPAM 1.4. CSRF can be used to change the password of any user/admin, to escalate privileges, and to gain access to more data and functionality. This issue exists due to the lack of a requirement to provide the old password, and the lack of security tokens.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in HP Service Manager 9.30, 9.31, 9.32, and 9.33 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that (1) insert XSS sequences or (2) execute arbitrary code.

CSRF on Intelbras CIP 92200 devices allows an attacker to access the panel and perform scraping or other analysis.

ZendTo prior to 5.22-2 Beta allowed reflected XSS and CSRF via the unlock.tpl unlock user functionality.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Cognos Express 9.0 before IFIX 2, 9.5 before IFIX 2, 10.1 before IFIX 2, and 10.2.1 before FP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

The Video Share VOD – Turnkey Video Site Builder Script plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the adminExport() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and execute remote code when the Server command execution setting is enabled via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

flaskparser.py in Webargs 5.x through 5.5.2 doesn't check that the Content-Type header is application/json when receiving JSON input. If the request body is valid JSON, it will accept it even if the content type is application/x-www-form-urlencoded. This allows for JSON POST requests to be made across domains, leading to CSRF.