A CSRF issue was discovered on Intelbras IWR 3000N 1.8.7 devices, leading to complete control of the router, as demonstrated by v1/system/user.

Intelbras NPLUG 1.0.0.14 wireless repeater devices have no CSRF token protection in the web interface, allowing attackers to perform actions such as changing the wireless SSID, rebooting the device, editing access control lists, or activating remote access.

CSRF on Intelbras CIP 92200 devices allows an attacker to access the panel and perform scraping or other analysis.

An issue was discovered on Intelbras IWR 3000N 1.8.7 devices. When the administrator password is changed from a certain client IP address, administrative authorization remains available to any client at that IP address, leading to complete control of the router.

Intelbras WRN 150 1.0.18 devices allow CSRF via GO=system_password.asp to the goform/SysToolChangePwd URI to change a password.

A CSRF issue was discovered on Intelbras IWR 3000N 1.5.0 devices, leading to complete control of the router, as demonstrated by v1/system/user.

Intelbras IWR 1000N 1.6.4 devices allow disclosure of the administrator login name and password because v1/system/user is mishandled.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Git Plugin 4.11.3 and earlier allows attackers to trigger builds of jobs configured to use an attacker-specified Git repository and to cause them to check out an attacker-specified commit.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Symantec Messaging Gateway (SMG) before 10.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

An issue was discovered on NETGEAR WNR1000V4 1.1.0.54 devices. Multiple actions within the WNR1000V4 web management console are vulnerable to an unauthenticated GET request (exploitable directly or through CSRF), as demonstrated by the setup.cgi?todo=save_htp_account URI.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.12.0, 5.11.1, 5.10.2, 5.9.2, and 4.10.10. The login page allows CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in YDS Support Ticket System plugin <= 1.0 at WordPress.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface on the SMC SMCD3G-CCR (aka Comcast Business Gateway) with firmware before 1.4.0.49.2 allow remote attackers to (1) hijack the intranet connectivity of arbitrary users for requests that perform a login via goform/login, or hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (2) enable external logins via an mso_remote_enable action to goform/RemoteRange or (3) change DNS settings via a manual_dns_enable action to goform/Basic.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Brightmail Control Center in Symantec Message Filter 6.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (1) execute application commands or (2) create admin accounts.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Family Connections CMS (aka FCMS) 2.9 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (1) add news via an add action to familynews.php or (2) add a prayer via an add action to prayers.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in E4J s.R.L. VikBooking Hotel Booking Engine & PMS plugin <= 1.6.1 versions.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/index.php in 11in1 1.2.1 stable 12-31-2011 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add new topics via an addTopic action.

WooCommerce before 3.6.5, when it handles CSV imports of products, has a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issue with resultant stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via includes/admin/importers/class-wc-product-csv-importer-controller.php.

A vulnerability was found in BestWebSoft Contact Form 3.21. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function cntctfrm_settings_page of the file contact_form.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 3.22 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 8398d96ff0fe45ec9267d7259961c2ef89ed8005. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-225321 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Serv-U server responds with valid CSRFToken when the request contains only Session.

Shop Beat Solutions (Pty) LTD Shop Beat Media Player 2.5.95 up to 3.2.57 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss Download Plugin <= 2.0.4 versions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Coverity Plugin 1.11.4 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stoneware webNetwork before 6.0.8.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that modify user accounts.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects D3600 before 1.0.0.72, D6000 before 1.0.0.72, EX3700 before 1.0.0.70, EX3800 before 1.0.0.70, EX6000 before 1.0.0.30, EX6100 before 1.0.2.24, EX6120 before 1.0.0.40, EX6130 before 1.0.0.22, EX6150v1 before 1.0.0.42, EX6200 before 1.0.3.88, EX7000 before 1.0.0.66, and WN2500RPv2 before 1.0.1.54.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in unspecified services in IBM Rational Team Concert (RTC) 4.x before 4.0.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify work items.

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in W3 Eden Download Manager plugin <= 3.2.48 at WordPress.

The Scripts Organizer WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have capability and CSRF checks in the saveScript AJAX action, available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users, and does not validate user input in any way, which could allow unauthenticated users to put arbitrary PHP code in a file

The Option Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the plugin_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options on the WordPress site via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This can be leveraged to update the default role for registration to administrator and enable user registration for attackers to gain administrative user access to a vulnerable site.

Edoc-doctor-appointment-system v1.0.1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /patient/settings.php.

The Youtube Feeder WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the printAdminPage function found in the ~/youtube-feeder.php file which allows attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts, in versions up to and including 2.0.1.

In MIELE XGW 3000 ZigBee Gateway before 2.4.0, a malicious website visited by an authenticated admin user or a malicious mail is allowed to make arbitrary changes in the "admin panel" because there is no CSRF protection.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WPChill Gallery PhotoBlocks plugin <= 1.2.6 at WordPress.

The FoodBakery | Delivery Restaurant Directory WordPress Theme theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the foodbakery_var_backup_file_delete, foodbakery_widget_file_delete, theme_option_save, export_widget_settings, ajax_import_widget_data, foodbakery_var_settings_backup_generate, foodbakery_var_backup_file_restore, and theme_option_rest_all functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files, update theme options, export widget options, import widget options, generate backups, restore backups, and reset theme options via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

EyouCMS V1.5.8-UTF8-SP1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the background, column management function and add.

The Simple Download Monitor WordPress plugin before 3.9.9 does not enforce nonce checks, which could allow attackers to perform CSRF attacks to 1) make admins export logs to exploit a separate log disclosure vulnerability (fixed in 3.9.6), 2) delete logs (fixed in 3.9.9), 3) remove thumbnail image from downloads

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Max Foundry MaxButtons plugin <= 9.2 at WordPress.

The NPS computy WordPress plugin through 2.7.5 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

The Modal Window WordPress plugin before 5.2.2 within the wow-company admin menu page allows to include() arbitrary file with PHP extension (as well as with data:// or http:// protocols), thus leading to CSRF RCE.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPlus Better Messages plugin <= 1.9.9.148 at WordPress.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 6.2 through 7.5, as used in SmartCloud Control Desk, Tivoli Asset Management for IT, Tivoli Service Request Manager, Maximo Service Desk, and Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB), allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the eAccess Pocket WiFi (aka GP02) router before 2.00 with firmware 11.203.11.05.168 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) initialize settings or (2) reboot the device.

The fossura-tag-miner plugin before 1.1.5 for WordPress has CSRF.

A vulnerability was found in BestWebSoft Portfolio Plugin up to 2.04 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 2.06 is able to address this issue. The patch is named 68af950330c3202a706f0ae9bbb52ceaa17dda9d. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248955.

Xerox AltaLink C8035 printers allow CSRF. A request to add users is made in the Device User Database form field to the xerox.set URI. (The frmUserName value must have a unique name.)

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user.

Shield is an authentication and authorization framework for CodeIgniter 4. This vulnerability may allow [SameSite Attackers](https://canitakeyoursubdomain.name/) to bypass the [CodeIgniter4 CSRF protection](https://codeigniter4.github.io/userguide/libraries/security.html) mechanism with CodeIgniter Shield. For this attack to succeed, the attacker must have direct (or indirect, e.g., XSS) control over a subdomain site (e.g., `https://a.example.com/`) of the target site (e.g., `http://example.com/`). Upgrade to **CodeIgniter v4.2.3 or later** and **Shield v1.0.0-beta.2 or later**. As a workaround: set `Config\Security::$csrfProtection` to `'session,'`remove old session data right after login (immediately after ID and password match) and regenerate CSRF token right after login (immediately after ID and password match)

An issue was discovered in Serpico (aka SimplE RePort wrIting and CollaboratiOn tool) 1.3.0. It does not use CSRF Tokens to mitigate against CSRF; it uses the Origin header (which must match the request origin). This is problematic in conjunction with XSS: one can escalate privileges from User level to Administrator.