Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2019-8337

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-13 Feb, 2019 | 20:00
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:17
Rejected At-
Credits

In msmtp 1.8.2 and mpop 1.4.3, when tls_trust_file has its default configuration, certificate-verification results are not properly checked.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:13 Feb, 2019 | 20:00
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 21:17
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

In msmtp 1.8.2 and mpop 1.4.3, when tls_trust_file has its default configuration, certificate-verification results are not properly checked.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://marlam.de/mpop/news/mpop-1-4-3/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://marlam.de/msmtp/news/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://gitlab.marlam.de/marlam/mpop/commit/b51a6c6b8b83bf0913cc52fa2ff64307e987a5b8
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://marlam.de/mpop/news/mpop-1-4-3/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://marlam.de/msmtp/news/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://gitlab.marlam.de/marlam/mpop/commit/b51a6c6b8b83bf0913cc52fa2ff64307e987a5b8
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://marlam.de/mpop/news/mpop-1-4-3/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://marlam.de/msmtp/news/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://gitlab.marlam.de/marlam/mpop/commit/b51a6c6b8b83bf0913cc52fa2ff64307e987a5b8
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://marlam.de/mpop/news/mpop-1-4-3/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://marlam.de/msmtp/news/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://gitlab.marlam.de/marlam/mpop/commit/b51a6c6b8b83bf0913cc52fa2ff64307e987a5b8
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:13 Feb, 2019 | 20:29
Updated At:01 Mar, 2019 | 16:39

In msmtp 1.8.2 and mpop 1.4.3, when tls_trust_file has its default configuration, certificate-verification results are not properly checked.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.05.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.0
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

marlam
marlam
>>mpop>>1.4.2
cpe:2.3:a:marlam:mpop:1.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
marlam
marlam
>>msmtp>>1.8.2
cpe:2.3:a:marlam:msmtp:1.8.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://gitlab.marlam.de/marlam/mpop/commit/b51a6c6b8b83bf0913cc52fa2ff64307e987a5b8cve@mitre.org
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://marlam.de/mpop/news/mpop-1-4-3/cve@mitre.org
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://marlam.de/msmtp/news/cve@mitre.org
Patch
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://gitlab.marlam.de/marlam/mpop/commit/b51a6c6b8b83bf0913cc52fa2ff64307e987a5b8
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://marlam.de/mpop/news/mpop-1-4-3/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://marlam.de/msmtp/news/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Patch
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

85Records found

CVE-2018-4436
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2019 | 17:43
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue existed in configuration profiles. This was addressed with additional checks. This issue affected versions prior to iOS 12.1.1, tvOS 12.1.1, watchOS 5.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchostvosiOS, tvOS, watchOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-20245
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LDAP auth backend (airflow.contrib.auth.backends.ldap_auth) prior to Apache Airflow 1.10.1 was misconfigured and contained improper checking of exceptions which disabled server certificate checking.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-airflowApache Airflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-17612
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.01% / 76.16%
||
7 Day CHG-0.02%
Published-09 Nov, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sennheiser HeadSetup 7.3.4903 places Certification Authority (CA) certificates into the Trusted Root CA store of the local system, and publishes the private key in the SennComCCKey.pem file within the public software distribution, which allows remote attackers to spoof arbitrary web sites or software publishers for several years, even if the HeadSetup product is uninstalled. NOTE: a vulnerability-assessment approach must check all Windows systems for CA certificates with a CN of 127.0.0.1 or SennComRootCA, and determine whether those certificates are unwanted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sennheisern/aMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_server_2012windows_8.1headsetupwindows_rt_8.1windows_7windows_10windows_server_2019windows_server_2008n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3762
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2020 | 18:20
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Data Protection Central versions 1.0, 1.0.1, 18.1, 18.2, and 19.1 contains an Improper Certificate Chain of Trust Vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability by obtaining a CA signed certificate from Data Protection Central to impersonate a valid system to compromise the integrity of data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_integrated_data_protection_applianceemc_data_protection_centralData Protection Central
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2019 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationF5, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-global_lifecycle_management_opatchdebian_linuxnosql_databasethrifttraffix_signaling_delivery_controllerApache Thrift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-18227
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2018 | 04:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 21:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TitanHQ WebTitan Gateway has incorrect certificate validation for the TLS interception feature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-titanhqn/a
Product-webtitan_gatewayn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-19270
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:34
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD through 1.3.6b. Failure to check for the appropriate field of a CRL entry (checking twice for subject, rather than once for subject and once for issuer) prevents some valid CRLs from being taken into account, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/aFedora Project
Product-fedoraproftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12461
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-3.5||LOW
EPSS-0.10% / 27.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate Revocation Check failure

Fixed issues with NetIQ eDirectory prior to 9.1.1 when checking certificate revocation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-netiqNetIQ
Product-edirectoryeDirectory
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27400
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Apr, 2021 | 16:48
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise Cassandra integrations (storage backend and database secrets engine plugin) did not validate TLS certificates when connecting to Cassandra clusters. Fixed in 1.6.4 and 1.7.1

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1000520
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 12:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ARM mbedTLS version 2.7.0 and earlier contains a Ciphersuite Allows Incorrectly Signed Certificates vulnerability in mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() that can result in ECDSA-signed certificates are accepted, when only RSA-signed ones should be.. This attack appear to be exploitable via Peers negotiate a TLS-ECDH-RSA-* ciphersuite. Any of the peers can then provide an ECDSA-signed certificate, when only an RSA-signed one should be accepted..

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-4017
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.31% / 53.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Aug, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Salt before 2014.7.6 does not verify certificates when connecting via the aliyun, proxmox, and splunk modules.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-saltstackn/a
Product-saltn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0534
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.95% / 75.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2015 | 10:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3, RSA BSAFE Crypto-J before 6.2, RSA BSAFE SSL-J before 6.2, and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier do not enforce certain constraints on certificate data, which allows remote attackers to defeat a fingerprint-based certificate-blacklist protection mechanism by including crafted data within a certificate's unsigned portion, a similar issue to CVE-2014-8275.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDell Inc.
Product-bsafe_ssl-cbsafebsafe_ssl-jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-19271
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 66.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:33
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD before 1.3.6. A wrong iteration variable, used when checking a client certificate against CRL entries (installed by a system administrator), can cause some CRL entries to be ignored, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/a
Product-proftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0294
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 68.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 15:12
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 04:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

GnuTLS before 3.3.13 does not validate that the signature algorithms match when importing a certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GnuTLSRed Hat, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxGNU
Product-debian_linuxgnutlsenterprise_linuxGnuTLS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-7143
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.35% / 56.82%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2019 | 13:04
Updated-25 Nov, 2024 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Python Twisted 14.0 trustRoot is not respected in HTTP client

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twistedn/a
Product-twistedn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0786
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.14% / 77.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jan, 2018 | 01:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2, 4.7, 4.7.1, .NET Core 1.0 and 2.0, and PowerShell Core 6.0.0 allow a security feature bypass vulnerability due to the way certificates are validated, aka ".NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_server_2012windows_8.1.net_corewindows_rt_8.1windows_7windows_10powershell_core.net_frameworkwindows_server_2008.NET Framework, .NET Core, and PowerShell Core
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0227
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 76.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-29 Nov, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client Certificate Authentication feature for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection and bypass certain SSL certificate verification steps. The vulnerability is due to incorrect verification of the SSL Client Certificate. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the ASA VPN without a proper private key and certificate pair. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection to the ASA when the connection should have been rejected. This vulnerability affects Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliances (ISA), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliances (ASAv), Firepower 4110 Security Appliances, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Modules. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg40155.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-firepower_threat_defenseadaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco Adaptive Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-12496
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.80%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 May, 2019 | 10:59
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Hybrid Group Gobot before 1.13.0. The mqtt subsystem skips verification of root CA certificates by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hybridgroupn/a
Product-gobotn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-3451
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.74% / 71.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Aug, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

OpenFire XMPP Server before 3.10 accepts self-signed certificates, which allows remote attackers to perform unspecified spoofing attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-igniterealtimen/a
Product-openfiren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24560
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Sep, 2020 | 01:50
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An incomplete SSL server certification validation vulnerability in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products could allow an attacker to combine this vulnerability with another attack to trick an affected client into downloading a malicious update instead of the expected one. CWE-295: Improper server certificate verification in the communication with the update server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationTrend Micro Incorporated
Product-internet_security_2019officescan_cloudmaximum_security_2019premium_security_2019windowsantivirus\+_2019Trend Micro Security (Consumer)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12608
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 08:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Docker Moby before 17.06.0. The Docker engine validated a client TLS certificate using both the configured client CA root certificate and all system roots on non-Windows systems. This allowed a client with any domain validated certificate signed by a system-trusted root CA (as opposed to one signed by the configured CA root certificate) to authenticate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mobyprojectn/a
Product-mobyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9040
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jun, 2020 | 15:21
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Couchbase Server Java SDK before 2.7.1.1 allows a potential attacker to forge an SSL certificate and pose as the intended peer. An attacker can leverage this flaw by crafting a cryptographically valid certificate that will be accepted by Java SDK's Netty component due to missing hostname verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCouchbase, Inc.
Product-couchbase_server_java_sdkn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-3083
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). While validating the server's certificate during the connection setup, the client in Apache Hive before 1.2.2 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 doesn't seem to be verifying the common name attribute of the certificate. In this way, if a JDBC client sends an SSL request to server abc.com, and the server responds with a valid certificate (certified by CA) but issued to xyz.com, the client will accept that as a valid certificate and the SSL handshake will go through.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-hiveApache Hive
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-20011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 May, 2021 | 20:09
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libgrss through 0.7.0 fails to perform TLS certificate verification when downloading feeds, allowing remote attackers to manipulate the contents of feeds without detection. This occurs because of the default behavior of SoupSessionSync.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME Project
Product-libgrssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-27589
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Nov, 2020 | 13:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Synopsys hub-rest-api-python (aka blackduck on PyPI) version 0.0.25 - 0.0.52 does not validate SSL certificates in certain cases.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-synopsysn/a
Product-hub-rest-api-pythonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-4680
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.38% / 58.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Apr, 2017 | 17:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

FreeRADIUS 2.2.x before 2.2.8 and 3.0.x before 3.0.9 does not properly check revocation of intermediate CA certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSUSEFreeRADIUS
Product-linux_enterprise_serverfreeradiuslinux_enterprise_software_development_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44532
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle CorporationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxgraalvmmysql_clustermysql_enterprise_monitormysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-36377
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 12:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Fossil before 2.14.2 and 2.15.x before 2.15.2 often skips the hostname check during TLS certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fossil-scmn/aFedora Project
Product-fossilfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29495
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 23.38%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-07 May, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nim stdlib httpClient does not validate peer certificates by default

Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. In Nim standard library before 1.4.2, httpClient SSL/TLS certificate verification was disabled by default. Users can upgrade to version 1.4.2 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, set "verifyMode = CVerifyPeer" as documented.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nim-langnim-lang
Product-nimsecurity
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-7450
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Pulp before 2.3.0 uses the same the same certificate authority key and certificate for all installations.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pulpprojectn/a
Product-pulpn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25634
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2021 | 13:33
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to modify a digitally signed ODF document to insert an additional signing time timestamp which LibreOffice would incorrectly present as a valid signature signed at the bogus signing time. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-22939
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 34.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

If the Node.js https API was used incorrectly and "undefined" was in passed for the "rejectUnauthorized" parameter, no error was returned and connections to servers with an expired certificate would have been accepted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Siemens AGDebian GNU/Linux
Product-sinec_infrastructure_network_servicespeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxgraalvmmysql_clusternextgen_apijd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsnode.jsNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9321
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Mar, 2020 | 18:14
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

configurationwatcher.go in Traefik 2.x before 2.1.4 and TraefikEE 2.0.0 mishandles the purging of certificate contents from providers before logging.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefikn/a
Product-traefikn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-10937
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.38% / 58.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Sep, 2019 | 15:07
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IMAPFilter through 2.6.12 does not validate the hostname in an SSL certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-imapfilter_projectn/aDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxfedoraimapfilterbackports_sleleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found