The Content Copy Protection & Prevent Image Save WordPress plugin through 1.3 does not check for CSRF when saving its settings, not perform any validation and sanitisation on them, allowing attackers to make a logged in administrator set arbitrary XSS payloads in them.
The Homerunner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.29. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the main_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Migrate Users WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not sanitise or escape its Delimiter option before outputting in a page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. Furthermore, the plugin does not have CSRF check in place when saving its options, allowing the issue to be exploited via a CSRF attack.
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in code-projects School Fees Payment System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
The VM Backups WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF checks, allowing attackers to make a logged in user unwanted actions, such as update the plugin's options, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue.
The fitness calculators WordPress plugin before 1.9.6 add calculators for Water intake, BMI calculator, protein Intake, and Body Fat and was lacking CSRF check, allowing attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions, such as change the calculator headers. Due to the lack of sanitisation, this could also lead to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue
The Copymatic – AI Content Writer & Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'copymatic-menu' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the copymatic_apikey option via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Timetable and Event Schedule WordPress plugin before 2.4.2 does not have proper access control when deleting a timeslot, allowing any user with the edit_posts capability (contributor+) to delete arbitrary timeslot from any events. Furthermore, no CSRF check is in place as well, allowing such attack to be performed via CSRF against a logged in with such capability
This Gallery from files WordPress plugin through 1.6.0 gives the functionality of uploading images to the server. But filenames are not properly sanitized before being output in an error message when they have an invalid extension, leading to a reflected Cross-Site Scripting issue. Due to the lack of CSRF check, the attack could also be performed via such vector.
The Custom Login Redirect WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF check in place when saving its settings, and do not sanitise or escape user input before outputting them back in the page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue
Lack of CSRF checks in the ActiveCampaign WordPress plugin, versions before 8.0.2, on its Settings form, which could allow attacker to make a logged-in administrator change API Credentials to attacker's account.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Epsiloncool WP Fast Total Search allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Fast Total Search: from n/a through 1.79.270.
The Social Tape WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF checks in place when saving its settings, and do not sanitise or escape them before outputting them back in the page, leading to a stored Cross-Site Scripting issue via a CSRF attack
The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 provides a function to create donation buttons which are internally stored as posts. The deletion of a button is not CSRF protected and there is no control to check if the deleted post was a button post. As a result, an attacker could make logged in admins delete arbitrary posts
The తెలుగు బైబిల్ వచనములు WordPress plugin through 1.0 is lacking any CSRF check when saving its settings and verses, and do not sanitise or escape them when outputting them back in the page. This could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings, as well as add malicious verses containing JavaScript code in them, leading to Stored XSS issues
The Glass WordPress plugin through 1.3.2 does not sanitise or escape its "Glass Pages" setting before outputting in a page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. Furthermore, the plugin did not have CSRF check in place when saving its settings, allowing the issue to be exploited via a CSRF attack.
The Quiz and Survey Master (QSM) WordPress plugin before 10.2.3 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.
The Digital Marketing and Agency Templates Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the import_templates() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger an import via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A vulnerability has been found in Konica Minolta bizhub up to 20250202 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
The WP2HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Bunny’s Print CSS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.95. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the pcss_options_subpanel() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The WP Sliding Login/Dashboard Panel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_sliding_panel_user_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Micro Focus Application Automation Tools Plugin - Jenkins plugin. The vulnerability affects version 6.7 and earlier versions. The vulnerability could allow form validation without permission checks.
A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Car Rental Portal 3.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Concrete CMS prior to 8.5.6 had a CSFR vulnerability allowing attachments to comments in the conversation section to be deleted.Credit for discovery: "Solar Security Research Team"
The Yougler Blogger Profile Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, v1.01. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yougler-plugin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Plugins and Snippets Simple Page Access Restriction allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Simple Page Access Restriction: from n/a through 1.0.32.
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Micro Focus Application Performance Management product, affecting versions 9.40, 9.50 and 9.51. The vulnerability could be exploited by attacker to trick the users into executing actions of the attacker's choosing.
The QuickSwish WordPress plugin before 1.1.0 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the GraphQL API in GitLab since version 13.12 and before versions 13.12.6 and 14.0.2 allowed an attacker to call mutations as the victim
The WP Firebase Push Notification plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wfpn_brodcast_notification_message() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send broadcast notifications via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A vulnerability was found in MdAlAmin-aol Own Health Record 0.1-alpha/0.2-alpha/0.3-alpha/0.3.1-alpha. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file includes/logout.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 0.4-alpha is able to address this issue. The patch is named 58b413aa40820b49070782c786c526850ab7748f. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-249191.
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all previous versions. If the victim is an admin, it was possible to issue a CSRF in System hooks through the API.
The RD Contacto plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the rdWappUpdateData() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The avenirsoft-directdownload plugin 1.0 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via wp-admin/admin.php?page=avenir_plugin.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shahjahan Jewel Fluent Support allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Fluent Support: from n/a through 1.9.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in motov.net Ebook Store allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Ebook Store: from n/a through 5.8013.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MotoPress Hotel Booking Lite plugin <= 4.6.0 versions.
The New User Approve WordPress plugin before 2.4 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings and adding invitation codes, which could allow attackers to add invitation codes (for bypassing the provided restrictions) and to change plugin settings by tricking admin users into visiting specially crafted websites.
Some ZTE products have CSRF vulnerability. Because some pages lack CSRF random value verification, attackers could perform illegal authorization operations by constructing messages.This affects: ZXHN H168N V3.5.0_EG1T5_TE, V2.5.5, ZXHN H108N V2.5.5_BTMT1
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins requests-plugin Plugin 2.2.12 and earlier allows attackers to create requests and/or have administrators apply pending requests.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Chartify allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Chartify: from n/a through 3.5.3.
The Himer WordPress theme before 2.1.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make users join private groups via a CSRF attack
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bobbingwide oik allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects oik: from n/a through 4.15.2.
ZTE MF971R product has a Referer authentication bypass vulnerability. Without CSRF verification, an attackercould use this vulnerability to perform illegal authorization operations by sending a request to the user to click.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Blackboard Academic Suite 8.0.260.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of student users for requests that change configuration and enrollments via unspecified input to (1) update_module.jsp, (2) enroll_course.pl, and (3) unenroll.jsp.
DrayTek routers before 2018-05-23 allow CSRF attacks to change DNS or DHCP settings, a related issue to CVE-2017-11649.
UnoPim is an open-source Product Information Management (PIM) system built on the Laravel framework. Before 0.2.1, some of the endpoints of the application is vulnerable to Cross site Request forgery (CSRF). This vulnerability is fixed in 0.2.1.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Claim Plugin 2.18.1 and earlier allows attackers to change claims.
Magneto LTS (Long Term Support) is a community developed alternative to the Magento CE official releases. Versions prior to 19.4.22 and 20.0.19 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery. The password reset form is vulnerable to CSRF between the time the reset password link is clicked and user submits new password. This issue is patched in versions 19.4.22 and 20.0.19. There are no workarounds.