Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in BEdita before 3.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create categories via a data array to news/saveCategories or (2) modify credentials via a data array to admin/saveUser.

The Side Menu Lite WordPress plugin before 4.2.1 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting buttons via CSRF attacks

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the com_templates component in Joomla! 3.2.0 through 3.3.x and 3.4.x before 3.4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WordPress uListing plugin (versions <= 2.0.5) as it lacks CSRF checks on plugin administration pages.

Cross-site request forgery has been identified in Moxa IKS and EDS, which may allow for the execution of unauthorized actions on the device.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in FUEL-CMS 1.4.13 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary code via post ID to /permissions/delete/2---.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in calendar.class.php in ApPHP Calendar (ApPHP CAL) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that use the (1) category_name, (2) category_description, (3) event_name, or (4) event_description parameter.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Power Manager (HPPM) 4.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText ECM (formerly Livelink ECM) 9.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change folder and resource permissions.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in admin/update_user in Hulihan Amethyst 0.1.5, and possibly earlier, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrative password or (2) change the site's configuration.

Batavi before 1.0 has CSRF.

The request phase of the OmniAuth Ruby gem (1.9.1 and earlier) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery when used as part of the Ruby on Rails framework, allowing accounts to be connected without user intent, user interaction, or feedback to the user. This permits a secondary account to be able to sign into the web application as the primary account.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VaM Shop 1.6, 1.6.1, and probably earlier versions allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change user status via admin/customers.php or (2) change user permissions via admin/accounting.php. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

The wp-google-map-plugin plugin before 2.3.10 for WordPress has CSRF in the add/edit category feature.

The unite-gallery-lite plugin before 1.5 for WordPress has CSRF and SQL injection via wp-admin/admin-ajax.php in a unitegallery_ajax_action operation.

Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.9 and 2.4.x before 2.4.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via destructive controller actions, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-5087.

The Swifty Page Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several AJAX actions handling page creation and deletion among other things. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those functions, via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Ultra Simple Paypal Shopping Cart v4.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox before 3.5.17 and 3.6.x before 3.6.14, and SeaMonkey before 2.0.12, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that were initiated by a plugin and received a 307 redirect to a page on a different web site.

Luigi version prior to version 2.8.0; after commit 53b52e12745075a8acc016d33945d9d6a7a6aaeb; after GitHub PR spotify/luigi/pull/1870 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in API endpoint: /api/<method> that can result in Task metadata such as task name, id, parameter, etc. will be leaked to unauthorized users. This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim must visit a specially crafted webpage from the network where their Luigi server is accessible.. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.8.0 and later.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Web Interface in the Endpoint Protection Manager in Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) 11.0.600x through 11.0.6300 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative accounts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in adv_pwd_cgi in the web management interface on Arris DG860A, TG862A, and TG862G devices with firmware TS0703128_100611 through TS0705125D_031115 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in MemHT Portal 4.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify settings via a configuration action to admin.php, (2) modify articles via an articles action to admin.php, or (3) modify credentials via a users action to admin.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Performance Management before 6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ESAdmin/security.do in the administrator interface in IBM OmniFind Enterprise Edition before 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add an administrative user via a saveNewUser action.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Matthew Fries MF Gig Calendar.This issue affects MF Gig Calendar : from n/a through 1.2.1.

Zikula before 1.2.3 does not use the authid protection mechanism for (1) the lostpassword form and (2) mailpasswd processing, which makes it easier for remote attackers to generate a flood of password requests and possibly conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via multiple form submissions.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Virtual Machine Management before 6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

AXIS Communications products allow CSRF, as demonstrated by admin/pwdgrp.cgi, vaconfig.cgi, and admin/local_del.cgi.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Change Group Permissions module in CMS Made Simple 1.7.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that make permission modifications.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Horde before 5.2.8, Horde Groupware before 5.2.11, and Horde Groupware Webmail Edition before 5.2.11 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary (1) commands via the cmd parameter to admin/cmdshell.php, (2) SQL queries via the sql parameter to admin/sqlshell.php, or (3) PHP code via the php parameter to admin/phpshell.php.

The WP Prayer WordPress plugin through 2.0.9 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its email settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in kalcaddle KodExplorer up to 4.49. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.50 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-227000.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/libs/ADMIN.php in BLOG:CMS 4.2.1.e, and possibly earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

The logout option within MFA did not include the necessary token to avoid the risk of users inadvertently being logged out via CSRF.

Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware 5.2 has CSRF

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control for Linux before 6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CMS Made Simple 1.8.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that reset the administrative password. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

Actions in the admin management of analytics models did not include the necessary token to prevent a CSRF risk.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Views UI implementation in the Views module 5.x before 5.x-1.8 and 6.x before 6.x-2.11 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable all Views or (2) disable all Views.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Contest Gallery versions prior to 10.4.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

An issue was discovered in UsualToolCMS 8.0. cmsadmin/a_sqlbackx.php?t=sql allows CSRF attacks that can execute SQL statements, and consequently execute arbitrary PHP code by writing that code into a .php file.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Compress WP Compress – Image Optimizer [All-In-One].This issue affects WP Compress – Image Optimizer [All-In-One]: from n/a through 6.10.35.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php in ProjectPier 0.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to perform actions as an administrator via the query string, as demonstrated by a delete project action.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in usercp2.php in MyBB (aka MyBulletinBoard) before 1.4.12 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Meeting Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a customized link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected device by using a web browser and with the privileges of the user.

Under certain circumstances the exacqVision Web Services may be susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cleverplugins.Com SEO Booster.This issue affects SEO Booster: from n/a through 3.8.9.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Power Management before 6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.