Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Paytm Paytm Payment Gateway.This issue affects Paytm Payment Gateway: from n/a through 2.7.0.

rpcapd/daemon.c in libpcap before 1.9.1 allows SSRF because a URL may be provided as a capture source.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Enterprise Edition 10.6 through 12.0.2. The GitHub project integration was vulnerable to an SSRF vulnerability which allowed an attacker to make requests to local network resources. It has Incorrect Access Control.

In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+..) .

iTop is an open source web based IT Service Management tool. In affected versions an attacker can call the system setup without authentication. Given specific parameters this can lead to SSRF. This issue has been resolved in versions 2.6.5 and 2.7.5 and later

A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface, which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause the appliance to make requests to an unintended location.

All request mappings in `StreamingCoordinatorController.java` handling `/kylin/api/streaming_coordinator/*` REST API endpoints did not include any security checks, which allowed an unauthenticated user to issue arbitrary requests, such as assigning/unassigning of streaming cubes, creation/modification and deletion of replica sets, to the Kylin Coordinator. For endpoints accepting node details in HTTP message body, unauthenticated (but limited) server-side request forgery (SSRF) can be achieved. This issue affects Apache Kylin Apache Kylin 3 versions prior to 3.1.2.

SAP NetWeaver Administrator(System Overview) allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate accessible HTTP endpoints in the internal network by specially crafting HTTP requests. On successful exploitation this can result in Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which could have a low impact on integrity and confidentiality of data. It has no impact on availability of the application.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Hep Hep Hurra (HHH) Hurrakify allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Hurrakify: from n/a through 2.4.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Theme-Ruby Foxiz.This issue affects Foxiz: from n/a through 2.3.5.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Berqier Ltd BerqWP.This issue affects BerqWP: from n/a through 1.7.5.

An issue in Open-Source Technology Committee SRS real-time video server RS/4.0.268(Leo) and SRS/4.0.195(Leo) allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in RapidLoad RapidLoad Power-Up for Autoptimize.This issue affects RapidLoad Power-Up for Autoptimize: from n/a through 2.2.11.

The PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.8.0 via the transform() function. This can allow unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.7 via the 'font_url' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an SSRF attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input for specific HTTP requests that are sent to an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain limited sensitive information for services that are associated to the affected device.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Post .DOCX Source.This issue affects Seraphinite Post .DOCX Source: from n/a through 2.16.9.

The aoa-downloadable WordPress plugin through 0.1.0 lacks authorization and authentication for requests to its download.php endpoint, allowing unauthenticated visitors to make requests to arbitrary URLs.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Radio Player allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Radio Player: from n/a through 2.0.82.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the file upload section of imartinez/privategpt version 0.5.0. This vulnerability allows attackers to send crafted requests that could result in unauthorized access to the local network and potentially sensitive information. Specifically, by manipulating the 'path' parameter in a file upload request, an attacker can cause the application to make arbitrary requests to internal services, including the AWS metadata endpoint. This issue could lead to the exposure of internal servers and sensitive data.