The WP Championship WordPress plugin before 9.3 is lacking CSRF checks in various places, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin perform unwanted actions, such as create and delete arbitrary teams as well as update the plugin's settings. Due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping, it could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues

An issue was discovered in Pluck 4.7.10-dev2. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can editpage via a /admin.php?action=editpage

Monit before version 5.20.0 is vulnerable to a cross site request forgery attack. Successful exploitation will enable an attacker to disable/enable all monitoring for a particular host or disable/enable monitoring for a specific service.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment application could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions. More Information: CSCva54241. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1). Known Fixed Releases: 11.5(0.98000.216).

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 6.x before 6.3 allows remote attackers to perform administrative actions via vectors involving deletion of OpenID identities.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Matrix Reloaded Plugin 1.1.3 and earlier allows attackers to rebuild previous matrix builds.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Failed Job Deactivator Plugin 1.2.1 and earlier allows attackers to disable jobs.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins XebiaLabs XL Release Plugin 22.0.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

DBHcms v1.2.0 has no CSRF protection mechanism,as demonstrated by CSRF for an /index.php?dbhcms_pid=-80&deletemenu=9 can delete any menu.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Blackboard Academic Suite 8.0.260.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of student users for requests that change configuration and enrollments via unspecified input to (1) update_module.jsp, (2) enroll_course.pl, and (3) unenroll.jsp.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in WDJA CMS v1.5.2 allows attackers to arbitrarily add administrator accounts via a crafted URL.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Packagist microweber/microweber prior to 1.2.11.

The Google Authenticator WordPress plugin before 1.0.5 does not have CSRF check when saving its settings, and does not sanitise as well as escape them, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin change them and perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks

livehelperchat is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The Float menu WordPress plugin before 4.3.1 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting menu, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack

The Simple Membership WordPress plugin before 4.1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting Transactions, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary transactions via a CSRF attack

The Coming soon and Maintenance mode WordPress plugin before 3.6.8 does not have CSRF check in its coming_soon_send_mail AJAX action, allowing attackers to make logged in admin to send arbitrary emails to all subscribed users via a CSRF attack

phoronix-test-suite is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The miniOrange's Google Authenticator WordPress plugin before 5.5 does not have proper authorisation and CSRF checks when handling the reconfigureMethod, and does not validate the parameters passed to it properly. As a result, unauthenticated users could delete arbitrary options from the blog, making it unusable.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository crater-invoice/crater prior to 6.0.4.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and execute commands on the CLI of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading an already authenticated user to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the targeted user.

The Ad Invalid Click Protector (AICP) WordPress plugin before 1.2.7 does not have CSRF check deleting banned users, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin remove arbitrary bans

The Easy Digital Downloads WordPress plugin before 2.11.6 does not have CSRF check in place when inserting payment notes, which could allow attackers to make a logged admin insert arbitrary notes via a CSRF attack

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in cPanel, possibly 11.18.3 and 11.19.3, allow remote attackers to (1) execute arbitrary code via the command1 parameter to frontend/x2/cron/editcronsimple.html, and perform various administrative actions via (2) frontend/x2/sql/adddb.html, (3) frontend/x2/sql/adduser.html, and (4) frontend/x2/ftp/doaddftp.html.

A vulnerability was found in File Manager Plugin 3.0.1. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository yourls/yourls prior to 1.8.3.

Interaction error between Adobe Flash and multiple Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) services allow remote attackers to perform Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) style attacks by using the Flash navigateToURL function to send a SOAP message to a UPnP control point, as demonstrated by changing the primary DNS server.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the WHM interface 11.15.0 for cPanel 11.18 before 11.18.4 and 11.22 before 11.22.3 allow remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as cPanel administrators via requests to cpanel/whm/webmail and other unspecified vectors.

The Reset plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reset_db_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset several tables in the database like comments, themes, plugins, and more via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP Image Uploader plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gky_image_uploader_main_function() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The copy-me plugin 1.0.0 for WordPress has CSRF for copying non-public posts to a public location.

ismartgate PRO 1.5.9 is vulnerable to CSRF that allows remote attackers to upload imae files via /index.php

Tourism Management System Version: V 3.2 is affected by: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

In mblog <= 3.5.0 there is a CSRF vulnerability in the background article management. The attacker constructs a CSRF load. Once the administrator clicks a malicious link, the article will be deleted.

php/qmn_options_questions_tab.php in the quiz-master-next plugin before 4.7.9 for WordPress allows CSRF, with resultant stored XSS, via the question_name parameter because js/admin_question.js mishandles parsing inside of a SCRIPT element.

The WP Abstracts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on multiple functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Internationalization (i18n) Drupal module 5.x before 5.x-2.3 and 5.x-1.1, and 6.x before 6.x-1.0 beta 1, allows remote attackers to change node translation relationships via unspecified vectors.

A Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cscms music portal system v4.2 allows remote attackers to change the administrator's username and password.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects CM400 before 2017-01-11, CM600 before 2017-01-11, D1500 before 2017-01-11, D500 before 2017-01-11, DST6501 before 2017-01-11, JNR1010v1 before 2017-01-11, JWNR2000Tv3 before 2017-01-11, JWNR2010v3 before 2017-01-11, PLW1000 before 2017-01-11, PLW1010 before 2017-01-11, WNR500 before 2017-01-11, WNR612v3 before 2017-01-11, N450 before 2017-01-11, and CG3000Dv2 before 2017-01-11.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 2.1.0. It allows XSS via CSRF.

Neet AirStream NAS1.1 devices allow CSRF attacks that cause the settings binary to change the AP name and password.

The Lightbox Plus Colorbox plugin through 2.7.2 for WordPress has cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via wp-admin/admin.php?page=lightboxplus, as demonstrated by resultant width XSS.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in account-inbox.php in TorrentTrader Classic 1.08 allow remote attackers to perform certain actions as other users, as demonstrated by sending messages.

Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow unauthenticated remote attackers to restore the default configuration of fields via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the /secure/admin/RestoreDefaults.jspa endpoint. The affected versions are before version 8.21.0.

The topm-client from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities leading to single or bulk e-mail entries deletion discovered in Email Tracker WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.2.6).

glFusion CMS 1.7.9 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /public_html/admin/plugins/bad_behavior2/blacklist.php. Using the CSRF vulnerability to trick the administrator to click, an attacker can add a blacklist.

TenderDocTransfer from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Write vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection for the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains a Relative Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to write arbitrary files to any path on the user's system.

The tbm-client from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system.

The Sky Addons for Elementor (Free Templates Library, Live Copy, Animations, Post Grid, Post Carousel, Particles, Sliders, Chart, Blog, Video Gallery) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options on the WordPress site via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Please note this is limited to option values that can be saved as arrays.