Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Web Compliance Manager in Quest Policy Authority version 8.1.2.200 allows attackers to scan internal ports and make outbound connections via the initFile.jsp file. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer

Unauthenticated LFI/SSRF in JCDashboards component for Joomla.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the addCustomThemePluginRepository function in index.php in WonderCMS 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL to the theme/plugin installer.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Varun Dubey Wbcom Designs - Activity Link Preview For BuddyPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Wbcom Designs - Activity Link Preview For BuddyPress: from n/a through 1.4.4.

zrlog v3.1.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the downloadUrl parameter.

Esri ArcGIS Server before 10.8 is vulnerable to SSRF in some configurations.

kkFileView 4.0 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via controller\OnlinePreviewController.java.

TAXII libtaxii through 1.1.117, as used in EclecticIQ OpenTAXII through 0.2.0 and other products, allows SSRF via an initial http:// substring to the parse method, even when the no_network setting is used for the XML parser. NOTE: the vendor points out that the parse method "wraps the lxml library" and that this may be an issue to "raise ... to the lxml group.

SSRF exists in osTicket before 1.14.3, where an attacker can add malicious file to server or perform port scanning.

A SSRF vulnerability exists in the downloadimage interface of CRMEB 3.0, which can remotely download arbitrary files on the server and remotely execute arbitrary code.

upload.php in Responsive FileManager 9.13.4 and 9.14.0 allows SSRF via the url parameter because file-extension blocking is mishandled and because it is possible for a DNS hostname to resolve to an internal IP address. For example, an SSRF attempt may succeed if a .ico filename is added to the PATH_INFO. Also, an attacker could create a DNS hostname that resolves to the 0.0.0.0 IP address for DNS pinning. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-14728.

GitLab EE 3.0 through 12.8.1 allows SSRF. An internal investigation revealed that a particular deprecated service was creating a server side request forgery risk.

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. The mitigation for CVE-2024-29190 in valid_host() uses socket.gethostbyname(), which is vulnerable to SSRF abuse using DNS rebinding technique. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.3.2.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Azure allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Hawt Hawtio through 2.5.0 is vulnerable to SSRF, allowing a remote attacker to trigger an HTTP request from an affected server to an arbitrary host via the initial /proxy/ substring of a URI.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.6.10, 11.7.x before 11.7.6, and 11.8.x before 11.8.1. It allows SSRF.

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) before Virtual Appliance Host 22.0.862 Application 20.0.2014 allows Server-Side Request Forgery: Elatec V-2023-014.

A flawed DNS rebinding protection issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE 10.2 and later in the `url_blocker.rb` which could result in SSRF where the library is utilized.

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) before Virtual Appliance Host 22.0.862 Application 20.0.2014 allows Server-Side Request Forgery: CPA v1 V-2023-009.

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) before Virtual Appliance Host 22.0.862 Application 20.0.2014 allows Server-Side Request Forgery: rfIDEAS V-2023-015.

Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 allows attackers to execute blind SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter.

Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus 5.x before build 5703 has SSRF.

A flaw was found in Moodle versions 3.1 to 3.1.15 and earlier unsupported versions. The mybackpack functionality allowed setting the URL of badges, when it should be restricted to the Mozilla Open Badges backpack URL. This resulted in the possibility of blind SSRF via requests made by the page.

IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 and 5.0.8.6 Developer Portal can be exploited by app developers to download arbitrary files from the host OS and potentially carry out SSRF attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 159124.

The WebDAV endpoint in Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center before version 6.6.7 (the fixed version for 6.6.x), from version 6.7.0 before 6.8.5 (the fixed version for 6.8.x), and from version 6.9.0 before 6.9.3 (the fixed version for 6.9.x) allows remote attackers to send arbitrary HTTP and WebDAV requests from a Confluence Server or Data Center instance via Server-Side Request Forgery.

DevExpress before 23.1.3 allows AsyncDownloader SSRF.

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in DedeCMS 5.7.109. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file co_do.php. The manipulation of the argument rssurl leads to server-side request forgery. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-233371.

A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in FaviconServlet.java in Ignite Realtime Openfire through 4.4.2 allows attackers to send arbitrary HTTP GET requests.

WordPress before 5.2.4 has a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability because URL validation does not consider the interpretation of a name as a series of hex characters.

An SSRF issue was discovered in Enghouse Web Chat 6.1.300.31. In any POST request, one can replace the port number at WebServiceLocation=http://localhost:8085/UCWebServices/ with a range of ports to determine what is visible on the internal network (as opposed to what general web traffic would see on the product's host). The response from open ports is different than from closed ports. The product does not allow one to change the protocol: anything except http(s) will throw an error; however, it is the type of error that allows one to determine if a port is open or not.

Symantec Messaging Gateway, prior to 10.7.3, may be susceptible to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) exploit, which is a type of issue that can let an attacker send crafted requests from the backend server of a vulnerable web application or access services available through the loopback interface.

WordPress before 5.2.4 has a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability because Windows paths are mishandled during certain validation of relative URLs.

An SSRF attack was possible on a JetBrains YouTrack server. The issue (1 of 2) was fixed in JetBrains YouTrack 2018.4.49168.

An SSRF issue was discovered in the legacy Web launcher in Thycotic Secret Server before 10.7.

elestio memos v0.23.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs, which can be exploited to perform SSRF attacks.

An SSRF issue was discovered in HTTPD on MicroDigital N-series cameras with firmware through 6400.0.8.5 via FTP commands following a newline character in the uploadfile field.

A remote server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in HPE OneView version(s): Prior to 7.0. HPE has provided a software update to resolve this vulnerability in HPE OneView.

openITCOCKPIT before 3.7.1 allows SSRF, aka RVID 5-445b21.

A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in go-camo up to version 1.1.4 allows a remote attacker to perform HTTP requests to internal endpoints.

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in OTCMS up to 6.62. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/read.php?mudi=getSignal. The manipulation of the argument signalUrl leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-231509 was assigned to this vulnerability.

In Eclipse GlassFish since version 6.2.5 it is possible to perform a Server Side Request Forgery attack in specific endpoints.

Jizhicms v1.9.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via /admin.php/Plugins/update.html.

Report v0.9.8.6 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.

A vulnerability was found in wanglongcn ltcms 1.0.20. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function downloadUrl of the file /api/file/downloadUrl of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument file leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

A verbose error handling issue in the proxy service implemented in the GravityZone Update Server allows an attacker to cause a server-side request forgery. This issue only affects GravityZone Console versions before 6.38.1-5 running only on premise.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the upload processing interface of gaizhenbiao/ChuanhuChatGPT versions <= ChuanhuChatGPT-20240410-git.zip. This vulnerability allows attackers to send crafted requests from the vulnerable server to internal or external resources, potentially bypassing security controls and accessing sensitive data.

An issue was discovered in Simple Machines Forum (SMF) before release 2.0.17. There is SSRF related to Subs-Package.php and Subs.php because user-supplied data is used directly in curl calls.

openid.php in LightOpenID through 1.3.1 allows SSRF via a crafted OpenID 2.0 assertion request using the HTTP GET method.

Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) exists in the Print My Blog plugin before 1.6.7 for WordPress via the site parameter.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the 'add_webpage' endpoint of the parisneo/lollms-webui application, affecting the latest version. The vulnerability arises because the application does not adequately validate URLs entered by users, allowing them to input arbitrary URLs, including those that target internal resources such as 'localhost' or '127.0.0.1'. This flaw enables attackers to make unauthorized requests to internal or external systems, potentially leading to access to sensitive data, service disruption, network integrity compromise, business logic manipulation, and abuse of third-party resources. The issue is critical and requires immediate attention to maintain the application's security and integrity.