IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.8.x is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 214616.

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7 and 11.2.0 could allow an authenticated to view or edit a Jupyter notebook that they should not have access to. IBM X-Force ID: 206212.

IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

IBM Concert Software 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.2.1, and 1.0.3 could allow an authenticated user to inject malicious information or obtain information from log files due to improper log neutralization.

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

IBM CICS TX Standard and Advanced 11.1 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking. IBM X-Force ID: 229435.

IBM Sterling Order Management 10.0 could allow a user to bypass validation and perform unauthorized actions on behalf of other users. IBM X-Force ID: 229320.

IBM Security Guardium 11.5 and 12.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

IBM OpenPages 9.0 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information such as configurations that should only be available to privileged users.

IBM Jazz Reporting Service 6.0.6.1, 7.0, 7.0.1, and 7.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 198834.

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0.6 and 3.1.0 does not invalidate session after logout which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 183328.

IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 6.2.7.9, 7.0.5.4, and 7.1.1.1 could allow an authenticated user to initiate a plugin or compare process resources that they should not have access to. IBM X-Force ID: 190293.

Using HCL Marketing Operations 9.1.2.4, 10.1.x, 11.1.0.x, a malicious attacker could download files from the RHEL environment by doing some modification in the link, giving the attacker access to confidential information.

IBM Cognos Controller 10.4.1, 10.4.2, and 11.0.0 is vulnerable to external service interaction attack, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to induce the application to perform server-side DNS lookups or HTTP requests to arbitrary domain names. By submitting suitable payloads, an attacker can cause the application server to attack other systems that it can interact with. IBM X-Force ID: 220903.

IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, and 8.5.5 installations using Form Login could allow a remote attacker to conduct spoofing attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 145769.

IBM Resilient SOAR V38.0 could allow an attacker on the internal net work to provide the server with a spoofed source IP address. IBM X-Force ID: 190567.

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 is affected by an authenticated user obtaining elevated privileges with IBM Digital Certificate Manager for i (DCM) due to a web session hijacking vulnerability. An authenticated user without administrator privileges could exploit this vulnerability to perform actions in DCM as an administrator.

"IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 Web services could allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to conduct SOAPAction spoofing to execute unwanted or unauthorized operations. IBM X-Force ID: 234762."

Due to a bug in the handling of the communication between the client and server, it was possible for one client, already registered with their own client ID, to send messages to the server claiming to come from another client ID. This issue was resolved in Velociraptor 0.6.5-2.

Extensible Service Proxy, a.k.a. ESP is a proxy which enables API management capabilities for JSON/REST or gRPC API services. ESPv1 can be configured to authenticate a JWT token. Its verified JWT claim is passed to the application by HTTP header "X-Endpoint-API-UserInfo", the application can use it to do authorization. But if there are two "X-Endpoint-API-UserInfo" headers from the client, ESPv1 only replaces the first one, the 2nd one will be passed to the application. An attacker can send two "X-Endpoint-API-UserInfo" headers, the second one with a fake JWT claim. Application may use the fake JWT claim to do the authorization. This impacts following ESPv1 usages: 1) Users have configured ESPv1 to do JWT authentication with Google ID Token as described in the referenced google endpoint document. 2) Users backend application is using the info in the "X-Endpoint-API-UserInfo" header to do the authorization. It has been fixed by v1.58.0. You need to patch it in the following ways: * If your docker image is using tag ":1", needs to re-start the container to pick up the new version. The tag ":1" will automatically point to the latest version. * If your docker image tag pings to a specific minor version, e.g. ":1.57". You need to update it to ":1.58" and re-start the container. There are no workaround for this issue.

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (Adapter Engine), fixed in versions 7.10 to 7.11, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50; is vulnerable to Digital Signature Spoofing. It is possible to spoof XML signatures and send arbitrary requests to the server via PI Axis adapter. These requests will be accepted by the PI Axis adapter even if the payload has been altered, especially when the signed element is the body of the xml document.