Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-7671

Summary
Assigner-snyk
Assigner Org ID-bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730
Published At-10 Jun, 2020 | 15:36
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:41
Rejected At-
Credits

goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:snyk
Assigner Org ID:bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730
Published At:10 Jun, 2020 | 15:36
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 09:41
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
goliath
Versions
Affected
  • All versions including 1.0.6
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/AHTTP Request Smuggling
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: HTTP Request Smuggling
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351%2C
x_refsource_MISC
https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351%2C
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351%2C
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351%2C
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:report@snyk.io
Published At:10 Jun, 2020 | 16:15
Updated At:07 Nov, 2023 | 03:26

goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

goliath_project
goliath_project
>>goliath>>Versions up to 1.0.6(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:goliath_project:goliath:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-444Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-444
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351%2Creport@snyk.io
N/A
https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136report@snyk.io
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351%2C
Source: report@snyk.io
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136
Source: report@snyk.io
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

56Records found

CVE-2021-33037
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-2.50% / 84.73%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 14:55
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect Transfer-Encoding handling with HTTP/1.0

Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Debian GNU/LinuxThe Apache Software FoundationMcAfee, LLCOracle Corporation
Product-communications_diameter_signaling_routercommunications_cloud_native_core_service_communication_proxyhospitality_cruise_shipboard_property_management_systemepolicy_orchestratorsd-wan_edgeutilities_testing_acceleratorhealthcare_translational_researchcommunications_session_route_managercommunications_session_report_managercommunications_policy_managementcommunications_instant_messaging_serveragile_plmcommunications_cloud_native_core_policygraph_server_and_clientdebian_linuxcommunications_pricing_design_centertomeeinstantis_enterprisetrackmysql_enterprise_monitorsecure_global_desktoptomcatmanaged_file_transferApache Tomcat
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2021-25762
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.00% / 0.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Feb, 2021 | 15:24
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains Ktor before 1.4.3, HTTP Request Smuggling was possible.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-ktorn/a
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2024-52304
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Nov, 2024 | 20:12
Updated-15 Aug, 2025 | 17:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
aiohttp vulnerable to request smuggling due to incorrect parsing of chunk extensions

aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.10.11, the Python parser parses newlines in chunk extensions incorrectly which can lead to request smuggling vulnerabilities under certain conditions. If a pure Python version of aiohttp is installed (i.e. without the usual C extensions) or `AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS` is enabled, then an attacker may be able to execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections. Version 3.10.11 fixes the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-aiohttpaio-libsPython Software Foundation
Product-aiohttpaiohttpaiohttp
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2020-7659
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Snyk
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Jun, 2020 | 12:50
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

reel through 0.6.1 allows Request Smuggling attacks due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks. Note: This project is deprecated, and is not maintained any more.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-celluloidn/a
Product-reelreel
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2020-7238
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 70.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 16:43
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Netty 4.1.43.Final allows HTTP Request Smuggling because it mishandles Transfer-Encoding whitespace (such as a [space]Transfer-Encoding:chunked line) and a later Content-Length header. This issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-16869.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Netty ProjectDebian GNU/LinuxFedora ProjectRed Hat, Inc.
Product-debian_linuxnettyfedorajboss_enterprise_application_platformopenshift_application_runtimes_text-only_advisoriesjboss_enterprise_application_platform_text-only_advisoriesn/a
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
CVE-2020-5207
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.00% / 0.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 19:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Request smuggling is possible in Ktor when both chunked TE and content length specified

In Ktor before 1.3.0, request smuggling is possible when running behind a proxy that doesn't handle Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding properly or doesn't handle \n as a headers separator.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ktor.ioJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-ktorKtor
CWE ID-CWE-444
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found