EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Top Up Balance component under the Edit Member module.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Unified Serviceability subsystem in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCum95502.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DAP-1360 router with firmware 2.5.4 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that (1) change the MAC filter restrict mode, (2) add a MAC address to the filter, or (3) remove a MAC address from the filter via a crafted request to index.cgi.

Two legacy REST API endpoints for approval and request access are vulnerable to cross site request forgery. This issue affects Apache Superset version 1.5.2 and prior versions and version 2.0.0.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DIR-600 router (rev. Bx) with firmware before 2.17b02 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create an administrator account or (2) enable remote management via a crafted configuration module to hedwig.cgi, (3) activate new configuration settings via a SETCFG,SAVE,ACTIVATE action to pigwidgeon.cgi, or (4) send a ping via a ping action to diagnostic.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Maian Uploader 4.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the width parameter to (1) uploader/admin/js/load_flv.js.php or (2) uploader/js/load_flv.js.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the GDS component in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x and 11.x before 11.0-FP5 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.x through 11.x before 11.3-IF2 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Technicolor (formerly Thomson) TC7200 STD6.01.12 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) perform a factory reset via a request to goform/system/factory, (2) disable advanced options via a request to goform/advanced/options, (3) remove ip-filters via the IpFilterAddressDelete1 parameter to goform/advanced/ip-filters, or (4) remove firewall settings via the cbFirewall parameter to goform/advanced/firewall.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Executer in RICOS in IBM Algo Credit Limits (aka ACLM) 4.5.0 through 4.7.0 before 4.7.0.03 FP5 in IBM Algorithmics allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change (1) a deal's currency or (2) a limit via a crafted XML document.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Stark CRM 1.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add (1) an administrator via a crafted request to the admin page, (2) an agent via a crafted request to the agent page, (3) a sub-agent via a crafted request to the sub_agent page, (4) a partner via a crafted request to the partner page, or (5) a client via a crafted request to the client page.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5 SP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VMware vCloud Director 5.1.x before 5.1.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that trigger a logout.

In the Open Build Service (OBS) before version 2.4.6 the CSRF protection is incorrectly disabled in the web interface, allowing for requests without the user's consent.

CFME: CSRF protection vulnerability via permissive check of the referrer header

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 9.0 before Update 13, 9.0.1 before Update 12, 9.0.2 before Update 7, 10 before Update 14, and 11 before Update 2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web client in Serena Dimensions CM 12.2 build 7.199.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that use the user_new_master parameter to the adminconsole/ URI.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Manager application in Apache Tomcat 5.5.25 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that manipulate application deployment via the POST method, as demonstrated by a /manager/html/undeploy?path= URI. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report, stating that "the Apache Tomcat Security team has not accepted any reports of CSRF attacks against the Manager application ... as they require a reckless system administrator.

cgi-bin/module//sysmanager/admin/SYSAdminUserDialog in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.5 does not properly validate the csrf_token parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in goform/Quick_setup on Cisco EPC3925 devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change a password via the Password and PasswordReEnter parameters, aka Bug ID CSCuh37496.

TuziCMS 2.0.6 has index.php/manage/notice/do_add CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bluewrench-video-widget.php in the Blue Wrench Video Widget plugin before 2.0.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that embed arbitrary URLs via the bw_url parameter in the bw-videos page to wp-admin/admin.php, as demonstrated by embedding a URL to a JavaScript file.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Training Center allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCul25567.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CRU Ditto Forensic FieldStation with firmware before 2013Oct15a allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify the disk erase technique settings via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the retrospam component in wp-admin/options-discussion.php in WordPress 2.0.11 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that move comments to the moderation list.

A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in iCMS 7.0.16 which can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary web scripts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in enrol/imsenterprise/importnow.php in Moodle through 2.3.11, 2.4.x before 2.4.9, 2.5.x before 2.5.5, and 2.6.x before 2.6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that import an IMS Enterprise file.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the MRBS module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

In csrf-magic before 1.0.4, if $GLOBALS['csrf']['secret'] is not configured, the Anti-CSRF Token used is predictable and would permit an attacker to bypass the CSRF protections, because an automatically generated secret is not used.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/profile/index.php in Moodle through 2.2.11, 2.3.x before 2.3.11, 2.4.x before 2.4.8, 2.5.x before 2.5.4, and 2.6.x before 2.6.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete (1) categories or (2) fields.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ImageCMS before 4.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct SQL injection attacks via the q parameter, related to CVE-2012-6290.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cmd.cgi in Icinga 1.8.5, 1.9.4, 1.10.2, and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for unspecified commands via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by bypassing authentication requirements for CVE-2013-7106.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler Application Delivery Controller (ADC) 9.3.x before 9.3-64.4, 10.0 before 10.0-77.5, and 10.1 before 10.1-118.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Fat Free CRM before 0.12.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, related to the lack of a protect_from_forgery line in app/controllers/application_controller.rb.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the ZCC page in Novell ZENworks Configuration Management (ZCM) before 11.2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /core/tools/add_places.php

Windu CMS 2.2 allows CSRF via admin/users/?mn=admin.message.error to add an admin account.

The SourceHttpMessageConverter in Spring MVC in Spring Framework before 3.2.5 and 4.0.0.M1 through 4.0.0.RC1 does not disable external entity resolution, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, cause a denial of service, and conduct CSRF attacks via crafted XML, aka an XML External Entity (XXE) issue, and a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-4152 and CVE-2013-7315.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Neo4J 1.9.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by a request to (1) db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script or (2) db/manage/server/console/.

CloudForms 3.0 Management Engine before 5.2.1.6 allows remote attackers to bypass the Ruby on Rails protect_from_forgery mechanism and conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a destructive action in a request.

The EZ SQL Reports Shortcode Widget and DB Backup plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 4.11.13 to 5.25.08. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ELISQLREPORTS_menu' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Version 5.25.10 adds a nonce check, which makes this vulnerability exploitable by admins only.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in set_users.cgi in Conceptronic CIPCAMPTIWL Camera 1.0 with firmware 21.37.2.49 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add arbitrary users.

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below does not validate a CSRF token before processing requests to /dashboard/extend/update/do_update/<pkgHandle>. The do_update() method in concrete/controllers/single_page/dashboard/extend/update.php checks only canInstallPackages() before executing upgradeCoreData() and upgrade() on the named package's controller. Because the endpoint is a state-changing GET route with no token enforcement, an attacker can force an authenticated administrator to trigger a package upgrade via a single cross-site navigation.In order to be vulnerable, the victim must be passing canInstallPackages() and and a target package must already be already installed. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 7.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks  https://github.com/maru1009  for reporting.

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below contains a CSRF vulnerability in the install_package() method of concrete/controllers/single_page/dashboard/extend/install.php.  An attacker who can cause an authenticated administrator to visit a crafted page,  and who has placed or caused a package to be present under DIR_PACKAGES/<handle>/, can force the installation of that package without any CSRF protection. Package installation executes the package controller's install() method as the web server user, enabling remote code execution.  In order to be vulnerable, the victim must be passing canInstallPackages. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 7.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks  https://github.com/maru1009  for reporting.

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below does not validate a CSRF token before processing requests to /dashboard/extend/update/prepare_remote_upgrade/<remoteMPID>. An attacker who controls the remote package returned for a known marketplace item ID can overwrite the package PHP on disk and force its upgrade() method to execute in a single browser navigation. This results in remote code execution as the web server user.   In order to be vulnerable, the victim must be passing canInstallPackages, victim site must be connected to the Concrete marketplace; and the attacker controls the package returned for a marketplace item ID already installed on the victim site. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 7.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks https://github.com/maru1009 for reporting.

Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below emits a CSRF token in the local_available_update.php view ($token->output('do_update')) but the corresponding do_update() method in concrete/controllers/single_page/dashboard/system/update/update.php never calls $this->token->validate('do_update'). The form is rendered as a POST form, meaning the token reaches the browser, but because the controller discards it without verification, an attacker can craft a cross-site POST that triggers a core CMS update to an attacker-specified version string.  In order to be vulnerable, theictim must be passing canUpgrade()anda valid update version must be present under DIR_CORE_UPDATES. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 7.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks https://github.com/maru1009 for reporting.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/admin/modules/users/create.php in BigTree CMS 4.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create an administrative user via an add user action to index.php.

Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/logs/bulk/delete.  The The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.

Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/delete. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.

Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/cache. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.

Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/design. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.