The WP SOCIAL BOOKMARK MENU WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

The wp-google-map-plugin plugin before 2.3.10 for WordPress has CSRF in the add/edit map feature.

The wp-google-map-plugin plugin before 2.3.10 for WordPress has CSRF in the add/edit category feature.

The wp-rollback plugin before 1.2.3 for WordPress has CSRF.

The photo-gallery plugin before 1.2.42 for WordPress has CSRF.

The Enjoy Social Feed plugin for WordPress website WordPress plugin through 6.2.2 does not have authorisation and CSRF in various function hooked to admin_init, allowing unauthenticated users to call them and unlink arbitrary users Instagram Account for example

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Plume CMS 1.2.4 and possibly earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the administrator password via unspecified vectors.

The Digits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 8.4.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'digits_save_settings' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the default role of registered users to elevate user privileges via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

6kbbs 7.1 and 8.0 allows CSRF via portalchannel_ajax.php (id or code parameter) or admin.php (fileids parameter).

The wps-hide-login plugin before 1.1 for WordPress has CSRF that affects saving an option value.

The ad-inserter plugin before 1.5.3 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via wp-admin/options-general.php?page=ad-inserter.php.

The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12, 1.24.x before 1.24.5, 1.25.x before 1.25.4, and 1.26.x before 1.26.1 does not perform token comparison in constant time before determining if a debugging message should be logged, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8623.

The Index Now plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'reset_form' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary site options via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Gambio GX before 4.0.1.0 allows admin/admin.php CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Elasticsearch Kibana before 4.1.3 and 4.2.x before 4.2.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lifecycle Query Engine (LQE) in IBM Jazz Reporting Service (JRS) 6.0 before 6.0.0-Rational-CLM-ifix005 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.

The HTML_Quickform library, as used in Revive Adserver before 3.2.2, allows remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism via an empty token.

CakePHP 2.x and 3.x before 3.1.5 might allow remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism via the _method parameter.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Jahastech NxFilter 4.3.2.5. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /config,admin.jsp. The manipulation of the argument admin_name leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. VDB-248266 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Organizations page in Enterprise Manager in McAfee Vulnerability Manager (MVM) 7.5.9 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the com_templates component in Joomla! 3.2.0 through 3.3.x and 3.4.x before 3.4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

MITRE is populating this ID because it was assigned prior to Lenovo becoming a CNA. A vulnerability was discovered (fixed and publicly disclosed in 2015) in Lenovo Solution Center (LSC) prior to version 3.3.002 that could allow cross-site request forgery.

The WP Blogs' Planetarium WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Realtyna RPL (com_rpl) component before 8.9.5 for Joomla! allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add a user via an add_user action to administrator/index.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that have unspecified impact via vectors related to the HTTP GET method.

IBM Cloud Private 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 158116.

The Autotitle for WordPress plugin through 1.0.3 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

The WordPress Users WordPress plugin through 1.4 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

A vulnerability has been discovered on OJS, that consists in a CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) attack that forces an end user to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which they're currently authenticated.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in National Keep Cyber Security Services CyberMath allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects CyberMath: from v1.4 before v1.5.

A vulnerability was discovered in all quay-2 versions before quay-3.0.0, in the Quay web GUI where POST requests include a specific parameter which is used as a CSRF token. The token is not refreshed for every request or when a user logged out and in again. An attacker could use a leaked token to gain access to the system using the user's account.

The Custom User CSS WordPress plugin through 0.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Ipswitch MOVEit Mobile 1.2.0.962 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository prefecthq/prefect prior to 2.16.5.

A successful CSRF attack could force the user to perform state changing requests on the application. If the victim is an administrative account, a CSRF attack could compromise the entire web application.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on eWON devices with firmware through 10.1s0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that trigger firmware upload, removal of configuration data, or a reboot.

The Audio Merchant plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the function audio_merchant_add_audio_file function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AXIS Communications products allow CSRF, as demonstrated by admin/pwdgrp.cgi, vaconfig.cgi, and admin/local_del.cgi.

A DOM-Based cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software enables a remote attacker to execute a JavaScript payload in the context of an administrator’s browser when they view a specifically crafted link to the PAN-OS web interface.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in finnj Frontier Post allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Frontier Post: from n/a through 6.1.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface on the Cisco Scientific Atlanta WebSTAR DPC2100R2 cable modem with firmware 2.0.2r1256-060303 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) reset the modem, (2) erase the firmware, (3) change the administrative password, (4) install modified firmware, or (5) change the access level, as demonstrated by a request to goform/_aslvl.

The CommentTweets WordPress plugin through 0.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

Dell SupportAssist Client versions prior to 3.2.0.90 contain an improper origin validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to attempt CSRF attacks on users of the impacted systems.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Horde before 5.2.8, Horde Groupware before 5.2.11, and Horde Groupware Webmail Edition before 5.2.11 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary (1) commands via the cmd parameter to admin/cmdshell.php, (2) SQL queries via the sql parameter to admin/sqlshell.php, or (3) PHP code via the php parameter to admin/phpshell.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository pkp/customLocale prior to 1.2.0-1.

Spip 4.1.10 contains a file upload vulnerability that allows attackers to upload malicious SVG files with embedded external links. Attackers can trick administrators into clicking a crafted SVG logo that redirects to a potentially dangerous URL through improper file upload filtering.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository modoboa/modoboa prior to 2.2.2.

The Digital Publications by Supsystic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.7.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute AJAX actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Motorola Solutions MOSCAD IP Gateway allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify a password.

The WP Register Profile With Shortcode plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.5.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the update_password_validate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset a user's password via a forged request granted they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.