Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2021-27899

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-06 Apr, 2021 | 20:48
Updated At-03 Aug, 2024 | 21:33
Rejected At-
Credits

The Proofpoint Insider Threat Management Agents (formerly ObserveIT Agent) for MacOS and Linux perform improper validation of the ITM Server's certificate, which enables a remote attacker to intercept and alter these communications using a man-in-the-middle attack. All versions before 7.11.1 are affected. Agents for Windows and Cloud are not affected.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:06 Apr, 2021 | 20:48
Updated At:03 Aug, 2024 | 21:33
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

The Proofpoint Insider Threat Management Agents (formerly ObserveIT Agent) for MacOS and Linux perform improper validation of the ITM Server's certificate, which enables a remote attacker to intercept and alter these communications using a man-in-the-middle attack. All versions before 7.11.1 are affected. Agents for Windows and Cloud are not affected.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.proofpoint.com/us/security/security-advisories/pfpt-sa-2021-0004
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://www.proofpoint.com/us/security/security-advisories/pfpt-sa-2021-0004
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://www.proofpoint.com/us/security/security-advisories/pfpt-sa-2021-0004
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.proofpoint.com/us/security/security-advisories/pfpt-sa-2021-0004
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:06 Apr, 2021 | 21:15
Updated At:12 Apr, 2021 | 16:26

The Proofpoint Insider Threat Management Agents (formerly ObserveIT Agent) for MacOS and Linux perform improper validation of the ITM Server's certificate, which enables a remote attacker to intercept and alter these communications using a man-in-the-middle attack. All versions before 7.11.1 are affected. Agents for Windows and Cloud are not affected.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.8MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.8
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

proofpoint
proofpoint
>>insider_threat_management>>Versions from 7.9.0(inclusive) to 7.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:proofpoint:insider_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:linux:*:*
proofpoint
proofpoint
>>insider_threat_management>>Versions from 7.10.0(inclusive) to 7.10.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:proofpoint:insider_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:linux:*:*
proofpoint
proofpoint
>>insider_threat_management>>Versions from 7.11.0(inclusive) to 7.11.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:proofpoint:insider_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:linux:*:*
proofpoint
proofpoint
>>insider_threat_management>>Versions from 7.9.0(inclusive) to 7.9.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:proofpoint:insider_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:macos:*:*
proofpoint
proofpoint
>>insider_threat_management>>Versions from 7.10.0(inclusive) to 7.10.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:proofpoint:insider_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:macos:*:*
proofpoint
proofpoint
>>insider_threat_management>>Versions from 7.11.0(inclusive) to 7.11.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:proofpoint:insider_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:macos:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://www.proofpoint.com/us/security/security-advisories/pfpt-sa-2021-0004cve@mitre.org
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.proofpoint.com/us/security/security-advisories/pfpt-sa-2021-0004
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

155Records found

CVE-2023-50178
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 36.98%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-09 Jul, 2024 | 15:33
Updated-19 Sep, 2024 | 16:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiADC 7.4.0, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.1 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.1 all versions and 6.0 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the device and various remote servers such as private SDN connectors and FortiToken Cloud.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiadcFortiADCfortiadc
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-25642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SAP SE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Feb, 2024 | 02:44
Updated-08 May, 2025 | 15:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in SAP Cloud Connector

Due to improper validation of certificate in SAP Cloud Connector - version 2.0, attacker can impersonate the genuine servers to interact with SCC breaking the mutual authentication. Hence, the attacker can intercept the request to view/modify sensitive information. There is no impact on the availability of the system.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-SAP SE
Product-cloud_connectorSAP Cloud Connector
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-23632
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.55% / 66.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2022 | 14:55
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Traefik skips the router TLS configuration when the host header is an FQDN

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to version 2.6.1, Traefik skips the router transport layer security (TLS) configuration when the host header is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). For a request, the TLS configuration choice can be different than the router choice, which implies the use of a wrong TLS configuration. When sending a request using FQDN handled by a router configured with a dedicated TLS configuration, the TLS configuration falls back to the default configuration that might not correspond to the configured one. If the CNAME flattening is enabled, the selected TLS configuration is the SNI one and the routing uses the CNAME value, so this can skip the expected TLS configuration. Version 2.6.1 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, one may add the FDQN to the host rule. However, there is no workaround if the CNAME flattening is enabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefiktraefikOracle Corporation
Product-traefikcommunications_unified_inventory_managementtraefik
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21654
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 18.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:35
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect configuration handling allows TLS session re-use without re-validation in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. Envoy's tls allows re-use when some cert validation settings have changed from their default configuration. The only workaround for this issue is to ensure that default tls settings are used. Users are advised to upgrade.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-22156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 30.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2022 | 00:20
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: Certificate validation is skipped when fetching system scripts from a HTTPS URL

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Person-in-the-Middle (PitM) attacks when a system script is fetched from a remote source at a specified HTTPS URL, which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. The following command can be executed by an administrator via the CLI to refresh a script from a remote location, which is affected from this vulnerability: >request system scripts refresh-from (commit | event | extension-service | op | snmp) file filename url <https-url> This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S9; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2-S2, 20.1R3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-S1, 20.3R3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R2; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R1-S1, 21.1R2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-junosJunos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CVE-2022-21656
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.02% / 2.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:25
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
X.509 subjectAltName matching bypass in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. The default_validator.cc implementation used to implement the default certificate validation routines has a "type confusion" bug when processing subjectAltNames. This processing allows, for example, an rfc822Name or uniformResourceIndicator to be authenticated as a domain name. This confusion allows for the bypassing of nameConstraints, as processed by the underlying OpenSSL/BoringSSL implementation, exposing the possibility of impersonation of arbitrary servers. As a result Envoy will trust upstream certificates that should not be trusted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-843
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CVE-2022-20814
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2024 | 15:32
Updated-31 Jul, 2025 | 15:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence VCS Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the certificate validation of Cisco&nbsp;Expressway-C and Cisco&nbsp;TelePresence VCS could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data.&nbsp;&nbsp;The vulnerability is due to a lack of validation of the SSL server certificate that an affected device receives when it establishes a connection to a Cisco&nbsp;Unified Communications Manager device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a man-in-the-middle technique to intercept the traffic between the devices, and then using a self-signed certificate to impersonate the endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view the intercepted traffic in clear text or alter the contents of the traffic. Note: Cisco&nbsp;Expressway-E is not affected by this vulnerability.Cisco&nbsp;has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-telepresence_video_communication_serverCisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expresswaytelepresence_video_communication_server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-20860
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.31%
||
7 Day CHG-0.12%
Published-21 Jul, 2022 | 03:45
Updated-01 Nov, 2024 | 18:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Nexus Dashboard SSL Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the SSL/TLS implementation of Cisco Nexus Dashboard could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to alter communications with associated controllers or view sensitive information. This vulnerability exists because SSL server certificates are not validated when Cisco Nexus Dashboard is establishing a connection to Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC), Cisco Cloud APIC, or Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller, formerly Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) controllers. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using man-in-the-middle techniques to intercept the traffic between the affected device and the controllers, and then using a crafted certificate to impersonate the controllers. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to alter communications between devices or view sensitive information, including Administrator credentials for these controllers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-nexus_dashboardCisco Nexus Dashboard
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-4586
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Oct, 2023 | 10:46
Updated-30 Aug, 2025 | 11:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Hotrod-client: hot rod client does not enable hostname validation when using tls that lead to a mitm attack

A vulnerability was found in the Hot Rod client. This security issue occurs as the Hot Rod client does not enable hostname validation when using TLS, possibly resulting in a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-infinispanRed Hat, Inc.
Product-data_gridhot_rodRed Hat Data Grid 8.4.6
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-12195
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.20% / 42.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jul, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in all Openshift Enterprise versions using the openshift elasticsearch plugin. An attacker with knowledge of the given name used to authenticate and access Elasticsearch can later access it without the token, bypassing authentication. This attack also requires that the Elasticsearch be configured with an external route, and the data accessed is limited to the indices.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-openshift_container_platformOpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44549
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SMTPS server hostname not checked when making TLS connection to SMTPS server

Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of "man in the middle" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-sling_commons_messaging_mailApache Sling Commons Messaging Mail
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44531
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle Corporation
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsgraalvmmysql_enterprise_monitormysql_clustermysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44273
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Dec, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 04:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

e2guardian v5.4.x <= v5.4.3r is affected by missing SSL certificate validation in the SSL MITM engine. In standalone mode (i.e., acting as a proxy or a transparent proxy), with SSL MITM enabled, e2guardian, if built with OpenSSL v1.1.x, did not validate hostnames in certificates of the web servers that it connected to, and thus was itself vulnerable to MITM attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-e2bnn/a
Product-e2guardiann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-0601
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-94.03% / 99.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jan, 2020 | 23:11
Updated-30 Jul, 2025 | 01:45
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Known KEV||Action Due Date - 2020-01-29||Apply updates per vendor instructions.

A spoofing vulnerability exists in the way Windows CryptoAPI (Crypt32.dll) validates Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) certificates.An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using a spoofed code-signing certificate to sign a malicious executable, making it appear the file was from a trusted, legitimate source, aka 'Windows CryptoAPI Spoofing Vulnerability'.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GoMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_1607windowswindows_server_1909windows_server_1903windows_10_1803windows_10_1903windows_10_1507gowindows_10_1709windows_10_1809windows_10_1909windows_server_1803windows_server_2016windows_server_2019Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsWindows Server, version 1909 (Server Core installation)Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1909 for ARM64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsWindowsWindows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based SystemsWindows ServerWindows 10 Version 1909 for 32-bit SystemsWindows
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-6687
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 49.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Dec, 2019 | 17:46
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

On versions 15.0.0-15.0.1.1, the BIG-IP ASM Cloud Security Services profile uses a built-in verification mechanism that fails to properly authenticate the X.509 certificate of remote endpoints.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_application_security_managerBIG-IP ASM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-5961
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Jul, 2019 | 13:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Android App 'Tootdon for Mastodon' version 3.4.1 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mastodon-tootdonTsukurito, Inc.
Product-tootdon_for_mastodonAndroid App 'Tootdon for Mastodon'
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5810
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 30.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Chase mobile banking application for Android does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, related to overriding the default X509TrustManager. NOTE: this vulnerability was fixed in the summer of 2012, but the version number was not changed or is not known.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jpmorganchasen/a
Product-chase_mobilen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5817
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Codehaus XFire 1.2.6 and earlier, as used in the Amazon EC2 API Tools Java library and other products, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-codehausamazonn/a
Product-ec2_api_tools_java_libraryxfiren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5822
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The contribution feature in Zamboni does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, related to use of the Python urllib2 library.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMozilla Corporation
Product-zambonin/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5783
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.56% / 67.18%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Commons HttpClient 3.x, as used in Amazon Flexible Payments Service (FPS) merchant Java SDK and other products, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCanonical Ltd.The Apache Software Foundation
Product-httpclientubuntu_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-6032
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Dec, 2019 | 15:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The NTV News24 prior to Ver.3.0.0 does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ntvNippon Television Network Corporation
Product-news_24NTV News24
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5819
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

FilesAnywhere does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-filesanywheren/a
Product-filesanywheren/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3751
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-6.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 29.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Sep, 2019 | 16:52
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell EMC Enterprise Copy Data Management (eCDM) versions 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 2.1, and 3.0 contain a certificate validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack by supplying a crafted certificate and intercepting the victim's traffic to view or modify a victim’s data in transit.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_enterprise_copy_data_managementDell EMC Enterprise Copy Data Management (eCDM)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3875
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 14.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jun, 2019 | 13:51
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 19:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability was found in keycloak before 6.0.2. The X.509 authenticator supports the verification of client certificates through the CRL, where the CRL list can be obtained from the URL provided in the certificate itself (CDP) or through the separately configured path. The CRL are often available over the network through unsecured protocols ('http' or 'ldap') and hence the caller should verify the signature and possibly the certification path. Keycloak currently doesn't validate signatures on CRL, which can result in a possibility of various attacks like man-in-the-middle.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-single_sign-onkeycloakkeycloak
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2019-3685
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Nov, 2019 | 09:30
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing TLS certificate validation for HTTPS connections in osc

Open Build Service before version 0.165.4 diddn't validate TLS certificates for HTTPS connections with the osc client binary

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Open Build ServiceopenSUSE
Product-open_build_serviceOpen Build Service
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-3446
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 55.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Libcloud before 0.11.1 uses an incorrect regular expression during verification of whether the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Apache Software Foundation
Product-libcloudn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-0955
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Canonical Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Canonical Ltd.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 32.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Dec, 2020 | 00:50
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
software-properties incorrectly validated TLS certificates

software-properties was vulnerable to a person-in-the-middle attack due to incorrect TLS certificate validation in softwareproperties/ppa.py. software-properties didn't check TLS certificates under python2 and only checked certificates under python3 if a valid certificate bundle was provided. Fixed in software-properties version 0.92.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Canonical Ltd.
Product-software-propertiessoftware-properties
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1748
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 59.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Mar, 2019 | 23:50
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software Network Plug-and-Play Agent Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Cisco Network Plug-and-Play (PnP) agent of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. The vulnerability exists because the affected software insufficiently validates certificates. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted certificate to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks to decrypt and modify confidential information on user connections to the affected software.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ios_xeiosCisco IOS and IOS XE Software
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1683
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Feb, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-21 Nov, 2024 | 19:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco SPA112, SPA525, and SPA5x5 Series IP Phones Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the certificate handling component of the Cisco SPA112, SPA525, and SPA5X5 Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to listen to or control some aspects of a Transport Level Security (TLS)-encrypted Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) conversation. The vulnerability is due to the improper validation of server certificates. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious server certificate to present to the client. An exploit could allow an attacker to eavesdrop on TLS-encrypted traffic and potentially route or redirect calls initiated by an affected device. Affected software include version 7.6.2 of the Cisco Small Business SPA525 Series IP Phones and Cisco Small Business SPA5X5 Series IP Phones and version 1.4.2 of the Cisco Small Business SPA500 Series IP Phones and Cisco Small Business SPA112 Series IP Phones.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-spa501g_firmwarespa525g_firmwarespa512gspa500spa525gspa512g_firmwarespa525spa508gspa500s_firmwarespa525_firmwarespa502g_firmwarespa501gspa502gspa5x5spa500sspa509gspa500dsspa504g_firmwarespa112_firmwarespa5x5_firmwarespa509g_firmwarespa508g_firmwarespa112spa514g_firmwarespa514gspa500_firmwarespa500ds_firmwarespa504gCisco Small Business SPA112 Series IP PhonesCisco Small Business SPA5X5 Series IP PhonesCisco Small Business SPA500 Series IP PhonesCisco Small Business SPA525 Series IP Phones
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16209
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Brocade Communications Systems, LLC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Brocade Communications Systems, LLC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 44.12%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Nov, 2019 | 17:19
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability, in The ReportsTrustManager class of Brocade SANnav versions before v2.0, could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against Secure Sockets Layer(SSL)connections.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (Broadcom Inc.)Broadcom Inc.
Product-brocade_sannavBrocade SANnav
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16263
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Oct, 2019 | 11:19
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Twitter Kit framework through 3.4.2 for iOS does not properly validate the api.twitter.com SSL certificate. Although the certificate chain must contain one of a set of pinned certificates, there are certain implementation errors such as a lack of hostname verification. NOTE: this is an end-of-life product.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twittern/a
Product-twitter_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2011-3061
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 46.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Google Chrome before 18.0.1025.142 does not properly check X.509 certificates before use of a SPDY proxy, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers or obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGoogle LLC
Product-chromen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-32069
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2021 | 15:37
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a Man-In-the-Middle attack due to improper TLS negotiation. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMitel Networks Corp.
Product-micollabn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise disabled TLS validation using the CA certificate stores in Python 3 libraries by default

The httplib and urllib Python libraries that Splunk shipped with Splunk Enterprise did not validate certificates using the certificate authority (CA) certificate stores by default in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203. Python 3 client libraries now verify server certificates by default and use the appropriate CA certificate stores for each library. Apps and add-ons that include their own HTTP libraries are not affected. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-14516
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2019 | 13:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The mAadhaar application 1.2.7 for Android lacks SSL Certificate Validation, leading to man-in-the-middle attacks against requests for FAQs or Help.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-uidain/a
Product-maadhaarn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-12855
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 65.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jun, 2019 | 11:11
Updated-25 Nov, 2024 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In words.protocols.jabber.xmlstream in Twisted through 19.2.1, XMPP support did not verify certificates when used with TLS, allowing an attacker to MITM connections.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twistedn/a
Product-twistedn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11688
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 59.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2020 | 14:58
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in ASUSTOR exFAT Driver through 1.0.0.r20. When conducting license validation, exfat.cgi and exfatctl accept any certificate for asustornasapi.asustor.com. In other words, there is Missing SSL Certificate Validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aASUSTOR Inc.
Product-exfat_drivern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2011-0199
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 39.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Jun, 2011 | 20:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Certificate Trust Policy component in Apple Mac OS X before 10.6.8 does not perform CRL checking for Extended Validation (EV) certificates that lack OCSP URLs, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof an SSL server via a revoked certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-mac_os_xmac_os_x_servern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1003009
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.02% / 4.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Feb, 2019 | 16:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in Jenkins Active Directory Plugin 2.10 and earlier in src/main/java/hudson/plugins/active_directory/ActiveDirectoryDomain.java, src/main/java/hudson/plugins/active_directory/ActiveDirectorySecurityRealm.java, src/main/java/hudson/plugins/active_directory/ActiveDirectoryUnixAuthenticationProvider.java that allows attackers to impersonate the Active Directory server Jenkins connects to for authentication if Jenkins is configured to use StartTLS.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-active_directoryJenkins Active Directory Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-0054
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2019 | 19:26
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: SRX Series: An attacker may be able to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks during app-id signature updates.

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the SRX Series Application Identification (app-id) signature update client of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D120 on SRX Series devices. No other versions of Junos OS are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-srx345srx5800srx110srx4200srx340srx550_hmsrx4100srx220srx240srx3600vsrxsrx5400srx1400srx100srx3400srx300srx550srx320srx5600junossrx650srx210srx4600csrxsrx1500Junos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CVE-2018-8970
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 59.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Mar, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 07:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The int_x509_param_set_hosts function in lib/libcrypto/x509/x509_vpm.c in LibreSSL 2.7.0 before 2.7.1 does not support a certain special case of a zero name length, which causes silent omission of hostname verification, and consequently allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. NOTE: the LibreSSL documentation indicates that this special case is supported, but the BoringSSL documentation does not.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpenBSD
Product-libressln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1999035
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 11.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins Inedo BuildMaster Plugin 1.3 and earlier in BuildMasterConfiguration.java, BuildMasterConfig.java, BuildMasterApi.java that allows attackers to impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-inedo_buildmastern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1999025
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 11.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins TraceTronic ECU-TEST Plugin 2.3 and earlier in ATXPublisher.java, ATXValidator.java that allows attackers to impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-tracetronic_ecu-testn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1999034
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 11.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins Inedo ProGet Plugin 0.8 and earlier in ProGetApi.java, ProGetConfig.java, ProGetConfiguration.java that allows attackers to impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-inedo_progetn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5824
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Trillian 5.1.0.19 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-4831.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cerulean_studiosn/a
Product-trilliann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-32581
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Aug, 2021 | 19:19
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Acronis True Image prior to 2021 Update 4 for Windows, Acronis True Image prior to 2021 Update 5 for Mac, Acronis Agent prior to build 26653, Acronis Cyber Protect prior to build 27009 did not implement SSL certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAcronis (Acronis International GmbH)
Product-cyber_protection_agentcyber_protect_cloudtrue_imagen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5821
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 46.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2012 | 22:00
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 00:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Lynx does not verify that the server's certificate is signed by a trusted certification authority, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a crafted certificate, related to improper use of a certain GnuTLS function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lynxn/aCanonical Ltd.
Product-lynxubuntu_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-43550
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.29% / 78.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Oct, 2024 | 17:35
Updated-08 Jul, 2025 | 15:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_21h2windows_10_1809windows_server_2016windows_server_2022_23h2windows_server_2012windows_10_1507windows_11_21h2windows_11_24h2windows_10_22h2windows_server_2022windows_11_22h2windows_server_2019windows_10_1607windows_11_23h2Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 10 Version 1607Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2012Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows 11 version 22H3Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2016Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows 11 version 21H2Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1277
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2021 | 19:56
Updated-12 Nov, 2024 | 20:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Data Center Network Manager Certificate Validation Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted host or construct a man-in-the-middle attack to extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient certificate validation when establishing HTTPS requests with the affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-data_center_network_managerCisco Data Center Network Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-5909
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jul, 2020 | 12:26
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 08:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aF5, Inc.
Product-nginx_controllerNGINX Controller
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found